similar to: Asterisk on Ben NanoNote?

Only the following drivers aren't converted: - amdgpu, because of the driver_feature mangling due to virt support - nouveau, because DRIVER_ATOMIC uapi is still not the default on the platforms where it's supported (i.e. again driver_feature mangling) - vc4, again because of driver_feature mangling - qxl, because the ioctl table is somewhere else and moving that is maybe a bit too

Hello, this patch series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm to use the .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove() callback .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because the driver core doesn't (and cannot) cope for errors during remove. The only effect of a non-zero return value in .remove() is that the driver core emits a warning. The device

Hi I am about to set up a Centos server with samba and an MS server 2008 for a new customer. The MS server is required because he has an MSSQL application. The samba shares will be for everything else. I've previously set up centos and redhat servers as domain members with a 2003 pdc before I get stuck, are there any issues I should worry about with server 2008? What release of samba should I

Only the following drivers aren't converted: - amdgpu, because of the driver_feature mangling due to virt support - nouveau, because DRIVER_ATOMIC uapi is still not the default on the platforms where it's supported (i.e. again driver_feature mangling) - vc4, again because of driver_feature mangling - qxl, because the ioctl table is somewhere else and moving that is maybe a bit too

Hi Daniel. On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 06:04:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Only the following drivers aren't converted: > - amdgpu, because of the driver_feature mangling due to virt support > - nouveau, because DRIVER_ATOMIC uapi is still not the default on the > platforms where it's supported (i.e. again driver_feature mangling) > - vc4, again because of driver_feature

Hi, I am a newbe here, so I hope I am not asking something crazy. I was looking on the Celt downloads and I noticed that the latest command line builds were for version 0.6. I know it is still early in development, and that the devs probably don't have time for developing CL versions for everything. since I know nothing about sourcecode and whatnot, I was wondering if there was a fairly simple

Hi, I am new to llvm, not familiar with c++, after some use with llvm-objdump, and finding the broken output, I try to debug and fix the code so it can become usable. Please help review the patch, so that they can be merged. And there's still two major problem I have found about arm disassembler: 1. arm instruction decoder cannot recognise bx series instructions. 2. As gcc will

A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers implement more sophisticated encoders than that. Most drivers implement such a simple encoder and can use drm_simple_encoder_init() instead. The patchset converts drivers where the encoder's instance is embedded in

A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers implement more sophisticated encoders than that. Most drivers implement such a simple encoder and can use drm_simple_encoder_init() instead. The patchset converts drivers where the encoder's instance is embedded in

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Neo <smtian at ingenic.cn> wrote: > Hi, >    I am new to llvm, not familiar with c++, after some use with > llvm-objdump, and finding the broken output, I try to debug and fix the code > so it can become usable. Please help review the patch, so that they can be > merged. >    And there's still two major problem I have found about arm

I've posted a sample file for estimating loglinear models for square tables (mobility models) at http://www.xs4all.nl/~jhckx/mcl/R/ Comments and suggestions are welcome. John Hendrickx

Hi all I have a few Polycom 331's but after following allot of advice I can't get them to provision from a dhcp boot server. We have a sonicwall router in place. I can press setup and set the FTP boot server to my * box. From there th phones boot fine. But I cannot get them to autoprovision. I have tried dhcp option 66=ipaddres. 66=FTP://PlcmSpIp:PlcmSpIp at 192.168.1.1/ u ahve also

Hi- Is anyone working on multiple comparisons of means or post-hoc tests (ie: Tukey, Bonferroni) for R? I saw in the winter 98' archives of the R mailing lists that these tests had not been implemented yet, I was just wondering if I could look foward to having them. ;-) I also looked through the contributed packages and didn't see anything that offered such tests. I guess I could check

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,

In ocfs2_file_aio_write, it does ocfs2_rw_lock first and then ocfs2_inode_lock. But if ocfs2_inode_lock failed, it goes to out_sems without unlocking rw lock. This will cause a bug in ocfs2_lock_res_free when testing res->l_ex_holders, which is increased in __ocfs2_cluster_lock and decreased in __ocfs2_cluster_unlock. Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com> ---

Hi, I am a student and my team is trying to identify a suitable topic for our compiler class final project. The requirement is to implement some optimization in LLVM that is not already existed, at least not in the list of standard opt that LLVM already has. We are looking at loop fusion as a potential candidate topic. Since we are all new to LLVM we would like to ask for experts' opinions

Matt, Here's a Bonferroni-corrected multiple one-sample t-test that I wrote some years ago. It took a while to get it into R, as na.omit doesn't seem to handle vectors and I had to write a quick kludge (na.remove). Another more general point was that I discovered that the help page for t.test gives the name "parameters" for the degrees of freedom, as in S. However, the name

BenAskins (ben.askins-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org) has invited you as a friend on Quechup... ...the social networking platform sweeping the globe Go to: http://quechup.com/join.php/aT0wMDAwMDAwMDA5MjY4NjU4JmM9OTc1NDE%3D to accept Ben''s invite You can use Quechup to meet new people, catch up with old friends, maintain a blog, share videos &amp; photos, chat with

From: Jan Kara via Ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com> commit 90410bcf873cf05f54a32183afff0161f44f9715 upstream. When buffered write fails to copy data into underlying page cache page, ocfs2_write_end_nolock() just zeroes out and dirties the page. This can leave dirty page beyond EOF and if page writeback tries to write this page before write succeeds and expands i_size, page gets