opus - Jul 2010 - can I create command line versions of the newer test releases?

Hi,
I am a newbe here, so I hope I am not asking something crazy. I was looking on
the Celt downloads and I noticed that the latest command line builds were for
version 0.6. I know it is still early in development, and that the devs probably
don't have time for developing CL versions for everything. since I know
nothing about sourcecode and whatnot, I was wondering if there was a fairly
simple way to build a CL version of the later releases like 0.8, just for me to
test and hear how well it's coming along. I am not a dev or anything, just
someone who likes playing around with these things. Or is this something which
is not easy to do, and I should wait for the developers to decide when to build
these? Should I try to test it now, or just wait?
Thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100730/9540abec/attachment-0001.htm

ok,i would asking something crazy,  i build a exe using /libcelt/testcelt.c
in windows, for my test purpose and using this command
testcelt 44100 2 256 46 input.wav output.wav

but i can't find any audioplayer could open output.wav, could anyone tell me
how using testcelt.c file to test wav format?


2010/7/30 Raymond Grote <musicalman1 at comcast.net>
>  Hi,
> I am a newbe here, so I hope I am not asking something crazy. I was looking
> on the Celt downloads and I noticed that the latest command line builds
were
> for version 0.6. I know it is still early in development, and that the devs
> probably don't have time for developing CL versions for everything.
since I
> know nothing about sourcecode and whatnot, I was wondering if there was a
> fairly simple way to build a CL version of the later releases like 0.8,
just
> for me to test and hear how well it's coming along. I am not a dev or
> anything, just someone who likes playing around with these things. Or is
> this something which is not easy to do, and I should wait for the
developers
> to decide when to build these? Should I try to test it now, or just wait?
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100801/793f9991/attachment-0002.htm

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Robby <banban at gmail.com>
wrote:
> ok,i would asking something crazy,? i build a exe using /libcelt/testcelt.c
> in windows, for my test purpose and using this command
> testcelt 44100 2 256 46 input.wav output.wav
>
> but i can't find any audioplayer could open output.wav, could anyone
tell me
> how using testcelt.c file to test wav format?

Testcelt.c works only on signed 16bit raw audio, not wav files.

i using this http://bearware.dk/temp/celt-0.5.2.zip <celt-dev at
xiph.org>, for
vs2005 to build the test project.
you can replace the libcelt from the 0.8.1, and delete all the .h and .c
files in the sln,and add the new version.


2010/8/1 Raymond Grote <musicalman1 at comcast.net>
>  Hi,
> I don't think the output file is a wav file, even though you set it to
that
> extention, I believe you'll still need a special celt decoder for the
> version, you'll have to build the decoder unless it's all in one,
which it
> might be. I wonder what the extention will be for celt files once the
> format is finalized?
> Is there a fairly simple way for me to build a command line version like
> you did? Or at least something that can be explained without being too
> technical?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Robby <banban at gmail.com>
> *To:* celt-dev at xiph.org
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 01, 2010 1:25 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [CELT-dev] can I create command line versions of the newer
> testreleases?
>
> ok,i would asking something crazy,  i build a exe using /libcelt/testcelt.c
> in windows, for my test purpose and using this command
> testcelt 44100 2 256 46 input.wav output.wav
>
> but i can't find any audioplayer could open output.wav, could anyone
tell
> me how using testcelt.c file to test wav format?
>
>
> 2010/7/30 Raymond Grote <musicalman1 at comcast.net>
>
>>  Hi,
>> I am a newbe here, so I hope I am not asking something crazy. I was
>> looking on the Celt downloads and I noticed that the latest command
line
>> builds were for version 0.6. I know it is still early in development,
and
>> that the devs probably don't have time for developing CL versions
for
>> everything. since I know nothing about sourcecode and whatnot, I was
>> wondering if there was a fairly simple way to build a CL version of the
>> later releases like 0.8, just for me to test and hear how well it's
coming
>> along. I am not a dev or anything, just someone who likes playing
around
>> with these things. Or is this something which is not easy to do, and I
>> should wait for the developers to decide when to build these? Should I
try
>> to test it now, or just wait?
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> celt-dev mailing list
>> celt-dev at xiph.org
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>>
>>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3042 - Release Date: 07/31/10
> 14:34:00
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100802/0629c673/attachment-0001.htm

Hi,

The bitrate figures I gave are *per channel*, so I suggest using 
something around 80-128 kb/s for stereo. Also, You should really use the 
latest release. It sounds much better than 0.5.1 for stero.

	Jean-Marc

On 10-08-02 02:22 AM, Robby wrote:
> i using this http://bearware.dk/temp/celt-0.5.2.zip
> <mailto:celt-dev at xiph.org>, for vs2005 to build the test project.
> you can replace the libcelt from the 0.8.1, and delete all the .h and .c
> files in the sln,and add the new version.
>
>
> 2010/8/1 Raymond Grote <musicalman1 at comcast.net
> <mailto:musicalman1 at comcast.net>>
>
>     Hi,
>     I don't think the output file is a wav file, even though you set it
>     to that extention, I believe you'll still need a special celt
>     decoder for the version, you'll have to build the decoder unless
>     it's all in one, which it might be. I wonder what the extention
will
>     be for celt files once the format is finalized?
>     Is there a fairly simple way for me to build a command line version
>     like you did? Or at least something that can be explained without
>     being too technical?
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         *From:* Robby <mailto:banban at gmail.com>
>         *To:* celt-dev at xiph.org <mailto:celt-dev at xiph.org>
>         *Sent:* Sunday, August 01, 2010 1:25 AM
>         *Subject:* Re: [CELT-dev] can I create command line versions of
>         the newer testreleases?
>
>         ok,i would asking something crazy,  i build a exe using
>         /libcelt/testcelt.c in windows, for my test purpose and using
>         this command
>         testcelt 44100 2 256 46 input.wav output.wav
>
>         but i can't find any audioplayer could open output.wav, could
>         anyone tell me how using testcelt.c file to test wav format?
>
>
>         2010/7/30 Raymond Grote <musicalman1 at comcast.net
>         <mailto:musicalman1 at comcast.net>>
>
>             Hi,
>             I am a newbe here, so I hope I am not asking something
>             crazy. I was looking on the Celt downloads and I noticed
>             that the latest command line builds were for version 0.6. I
>             know it is still early in development, and that the devs
>             probably don't have time for developing CL versions for
>             everything. since I know nothing about sourcecode and
>             whatnot, I was wondering if there was a fairly simple way to
>             build a CL version of the later releases like 0.8, just for
>             me to test and hear how well it's coming along. I am not a
>             dev or anything, just someone who likes playing around with
>             these things. Or is this something which is not easy to do,
>             and I should wait for the developers to decide when to build
>             these? Should I try to test it now, or just wait?
>             Thanks in advance.
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             celt-dev mailing list
>             celt-dev at xiph.org <mailto:celt-dev at xiph.org>
>             http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>
>
>        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         celt-dev mailing list
>         celt-dev at xiph.org <mailto:celt-dev at xiph.org>
>         http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>
>        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>         No virus found in this incoming message.
>         Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>         Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3042 - Release Date:
>         07/31/10 14:34:00
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev