similar to: beeping during calls

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "beeping during calls"

2010 Jul 14
2
beeping during call
Asterisk 1.4.32 dahdi-2.3.0.1 Centos 5.5 Digium TE420 CAC channel bank (2) Cisco RVS4000 router Cox 50 Mbps/ 5 Mbps cable modem Flowroute provider codac G-711 90 % CPU idle callwaiting=no When there are 10-15 or more calls up the farend hears a callwaiting like beep every 3 to 6 sec. the duration of this "beep" is very short and would be no problem if it didn?t happen every few
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy. Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ? That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP platform too specific ? what is the official policy ? README starts with
2011 Jun 14
1
Dahdi 2.4.0 and Squeeze [SOLVED]
After a reboot, I can't reproduce the problem anymore which is quite frustating. 2011/6/14 Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Olivier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using a two-years old installation script for the first time on a > > Squeeze (linux 2.6.32) platform. > > For an unknown reason (might
2009 May 29
2
SIP CALL: RTP ENCRYPTION
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:00:15PM -0500, research at businesstz.com wrote: >> Hello >> >> May i please know if asterisk is now supporting sip call encryption. It >> has been a requirement from one of my client to ensure that all >> conversation is well secured from any potential sniffers or inside >> hackers >> >> I have reviewed and shall
2011 Jul 02
2
chanspy spies on wrong channel
asterisk 1.4.32 have zapata.conf soft link to chan_dahdi.conf to use flash operator panel < 2.0 (from extensions.conf) exten=> 304,1,ChanSpy(Zap/4|q) exten=> 304,2,hangup There is no entry ChanSpy(Zap/41) in extensions.conf On dialing 304 and Zap/41 is in use this happens: [Jul 1 18:24:47] VERBOSE[14447] logger.c: -- Executing [304 at flash:1] ChanSpy("Zap/31-1",
2014 Jan 20
1
What is dahdi.auto_assigned_spans and why should you care?
What is dahdi.auto_assign_spans and why should you care? In later versions the kernel module dahdi[Q] includes a new parameter: auto_assign_spans. It defaults to 1, and if you set it to 0, DAHDI can start behaving in strange and completely expected ways. Chances are the default will be set to 1 in a future version. Here is why you'll want to set it yourself. Up until DAHDI 2.5, hardware
2010 Jun 01
0
Asterisk 1.4.32 Now Available
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.4.32. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ The release of Asterisk 1.4.32 resolves several issues reported by the community, and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following are a few of the issues resolved by community
2015 Jan 17
1
dahdi_genconf fails with "Empty configuration - no spans"
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:31:33AM +0100, Bertrand LUPART - Linkeo.com wrote: > >>> However, dahdi_genconf keeps finding no span: > >>> What am i missing? > >> > >> It looks like your driver is loaded correctly. My guess would be maybe > >> the dahdi-tools is packaged as an older version that doesn't know > >> about the newer te435
2005 Feb 06
0
Xorcom Rapid 1.0 released
Hi folks Xorcom Rapid 1.0 is avilable for download Q: 1.0? A: Sure, better than 0.9.1: * Asterisk 1.0.5 * Base packages upgraded * Built with SpanDSP support * Improved Zaptel detection * ast-cmd with some useful command-line abilities provided * ssh installed by default * putty.exe is included on the CD * music-on-hold files removed due to potential licensing issues
2017 Mar 21
2
How to install and configure Dahdi from Debian Stretch repo ?
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Olivier wrote: > Thanks to Tzafrir help, Now I have an Asterisk-Dahdi system installed from > Stretch repository. > This system has a Digium HX8 card with BRI modules, Asterisk 13.14.0, Dahdi > 2.11.1. > BRI spans appears as up and active but I've not tested them yet: > CLI> pri show spans > PRI span 1/0: Up, Active > PRI
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
static void senddialevent(struct ast_channel *src, struct ast_channel *dst) { manager_event(EVENT_FLAG_CALL, "Dial", "Source: %s\r\n" "Destination: %s\r\n" "CallerID: %s\r\n" "CallerIDName: %s\r\n" "SrcUniqueID: %s\r\n" "DestUniqueID: %s\r\n" "CDRUserfield: %s\r\n", src->name,
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
About the IVR, are u using Asterisk? Regards Bilal > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:23:41 +0200 > From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Credit Card processing > machines > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > Message-ID: <20090218102341.GD21440 at xorcom.com> >
2005 Jan 11
0
test source for current xorcom rapid
Hi I put a snapshot of our current packages updates.xorcom.com . They are available from the deb source deb http://updates.xorcom.com/test sarge main (this is s/rapid/test/ of the name of the source of the stable version) Changes include: * Fixed and simplified zaptel detection * Support for spandsp: compiled but not yet tested * IAX extensions * Mail server configuration * The script
2007 Oct 02
0
Selecting a specific line from Zap/g And secondary dial tone
Dear List; Thanks alot for the help. But how can I let the second dial tone (after pressing the extension to select that FXO port) to be difference than normal dial tone? Regards Bilal Ghayad -------------------------- Correction, on FXO port not FXS, second, read his email first: "Also, how it will be possible to assign an dedicated line (connected to FXO) to an button on the Polycom IP
2007 Oct 04
0
Fwd: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Hi On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:46:30AM -0300, Caciano Machado wrote: > I'm receiving a lot of warning messages from my Asterisk > 1.2.5/chan_oh323 every time
2007 Jan 17
0
Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about FXO/FXS device.
Okay, i'll move my discuss to asterisk-users. Thank you. On 1/17/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0800, ??? wrote: > > Jonson Player wrote: > > > Hello, I intend to buy a FXO/FXS device from Linksys. > > > I'm thinking about SPA3102. What you guys thik about it. > > > Is ok, is
2009 Jul 20
0
No subject
one under my default context at extention.conf. And what is [pbx_config]? Thanks Eyal -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:05 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is there a default dial plan that is not in
2012 Mar 08
0
[tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com: Re: [asterisk-dev] Proposal for DAHDI-trunk: deprecate old kernels]
Same question for asterisk-users as well: ----- Forwarded message from Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> ----- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:14:04 +0200 From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Short version: it's now time to remove. Anybody actually uses latest DAHDI with RHEL4? See inline, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:42:39PM
2007 Nov 11
0
sangoma asterisk patches
Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with htat patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause exexpected behaviour when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't
2009 Mar 28
0
oh323 to h323
Hi Debian has a package for chan_oh323 (the original, external h323). It is not maintaind for quite some time AFAIK and also AFAIK offers no real atvantages over chan_h323. So I'd like to remove it. Before I do that, I have some questions, as I'm not familiar with H.323 channels: 1. Are there any useful features oh323 supports that h323 doesn't? That the version of h323 in 1.4.21