Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "beeping during calls"
2010 Jul 14
2
beeping during call
Asterisk 1.4.32
dahdi-2.3.0.1
Centos 5.5
Digium TE420
CAC channel bank (2)
Cisco RVS4000 router
Cox 50 Mbps/ 5 Mbps cable modem
Flowroute provider
codac G-711
90 % CPU idle
callwaiting=no
When there are 10-15 or more calls up the farend hears a callwaiting
like beep every 3 to 6 sec. the duration of this "beep" is very short
and would be no problem if it didn?t happen every few
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed
asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy.
Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README
instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ?
That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP
platform too specific ? what is the official policy ?
README starts with
2011 Jun 14
1
Dahdi 2.4.0 and Squeeze [SOLVED]
After a reboot, I can't reproduce the problem anymore which is quite
frustating.
2011/6/14 Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Olivier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using a two-years old installation script for the first time on a
> > Squeeze (linux 2.6.32) platform.
> > For an unknown reason (might
2009 May 29
2
SIP CALL: RTP ENCRYPTION
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:00:15PM -0500, research at businesstz.com wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> May i please know if asterisk is now supporting sip call encryption. It
>> has been a requirement from one of my client to ensure that all
>> conversation is well secured from any potential sniffers or inside
>> hackers
>>
>> I have reviewed and shall
2011 Jul 02
2
chanspy spies on wrong channel
asterisk 1.4.32 have zapata.conf soft link to chan_dahdi.conf to use
flash operator panel < 2.0
(from extensions.conf)
exten=> 304,1,ChanSpy(Zap/4|q)
exten=> 304,2,hangup
There is no entry ChanSpy(Zap/41) in extensions.conf
On dialing 304 and Zap/41 is in use this happens:
[Jul 1 18:24:47] VERBOSE[14447] logger.c: -- Executing
[304 at flash:1] ChanSpy("Zap/31-1",
2014 Jan 20
1
What is dahdi.auto_assigned_spans and why should you care?
What is dahdi.auto_assign_spans and why should you care?
In later versions the kernel module dahdi[Q] includes a new parameter:
auto_assign_spans. It defaults to 1, and if you set it to 0, DAHDI can
start behaving in strange and completely expected ways. Chances are the
default will be set to 1 in a future version. Here is why you'll want to
set it yourself.
Up until DAHDI 2.5, hardware
2010 Jun 01
0
Asterisk 1.4.32 Now Available
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.4.32. This
release is available for immediate download at
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/
The release of Asterisk 1.4.32 resolves several issues reported by the
community, and would have not been possible without your participation.
Thank you!
The following are a few of the issues resolved by community
2015 Jan 17
1
dahdi_genconf fails with "Empty configuration - no spans"
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:31:33AM +0100, Bertrand LUPART - Linkeo.com wrote:
> >>> However, dahdi_genconf keeps finding no span:
> >>> What am i missing?
> >>
> >> It looks like your driver is loaded correctly. My guess would be maybe
> >> the dahdi-tools is packaged as an older version that doesn't know
> >> about the newer te435
2005 Feb 06
0
Xorcom Rapid 1.0 released
Hi folks
Xorcom Rapid 1.0 is avilable for download
Q: 1.0?
A: Sure, better than 0.9.1:
* Asterisk 1.0.5
* Base packages upgraded
* Built with SpanDSP support
* Improved Zaptel detection
* ast-cmd with some useful command-line abilities provided
* ssh installed by default
* putty.exe is included on the CD
* music-on-hold files removed due to potential licensing
issues
2017 Mar 21
2
How to install and configure Dahdi from Debian Stretch repo ?
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> Thanks to Tzafrir help, Now I have an Asterisk-Dahdi system installed from
> Stretch repository.
> This system has a Digium HX8 card with BRI modules, Asterisk 13.14.0, Dahdi
> 2.11.1.
> BRI spans appears as up and active but I've not tested them yet:
> CLI> pri show spans
> PRI span 1/0: Up, Active
> PRI
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
static void senddialevent(struct ast_channel *src, struct ast_channel *dst)
{
manager_event(EVENT_FLAG_CALL, "Dial",
"Source: %s\r\n"
"Destination: %s\r\n"
"CallerID: %s\r\n"
"CallerIDName: %s\r\n"
"SrcUniqueID: %s\r\n"
"DestUniqueID: %s\r\n"
"CDRUserfield: %s\r\n",
src->name,
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
About the IVR, are u using Asterisk?
Regards
Bilal
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:23:41 +0200
> From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Credit Card processing
> machines
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Message-ID: <20090218102341.GD21440 at xorcom.com>
>
2005 Jan 11
0
test source for current xorcom rapid
Hi
I put a snapshot of our current packages updates.xorcom.com . They are
available from the deb source
deb http://updates.xorcom.com/test sarge main
(this is s/rapid/test/ of the name of the source of the stable version)
Changes include:
* Fixed and simplified zaptel detection
* Support for spandsp: compiled but not yet tested
* IAX extensions
* Mail server configuration
* The script
2007 Oct 02
0
Selecting a specific line from Zap/g And secondary dial tone
Dear List;
Thanks alot for the help.
But how can I let the second dial tone (after pressing
the extension to select that FXO port) to be
difference than normal dial tone?
Regards
Bilal Ghayad
--------------------------
Correction, on FXO port not FXS,
second, read his email first:
"Also, how it will be possible to assign an dedicated
line (connected to FXO) to an
button on the Polycom IP
2007 Oct 04
0
Fwd: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities
To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
Hi
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:46:30AM -0300, Caciano Machado wrote:
> I'm receiving a lot of warning messages from my Asterisk
> 1.2.5/chan_oh323 every time
2007 Jan 17
0
Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about FXO/FXS device.
Okay, i'll move my discuss to asterisk-users.
Thank you.
On 1/17/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0800, ??? wrote:
> > Jonson Player wrote:
> > > Hello, I intend to buy a FXO/FXS device from Linksys.
> > > I'm thinking about SPA3102. What you guys thik about it.
> > > Is ok, is
2009 Jul 20
0
No subject
one under my default context at extention.conf.
And what is [pbx_config]?
Thanks
Eyal
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:05 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is there a default dial plan that is not in
2012 Mar 08
0
[tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com: Re: [asterisk-dev] Proposal for DAHDI-trunk: deprecate old kernels]
Same question for asterisk-users as well:
----- Forwarded message from Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> -----
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:14:04 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
Short version: it's now time to remove.
Anybody actually uses latest DAHDI with RHEL4?
See inline,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:42:39PM
2007 Nov 11
0
sangoma asterisk patches
Hi folks
I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly
got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here.
Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some
technical reservations with htat patch. It seems that under certain
circumstances it may cause exexpected behaviour when used with other
Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't
2009 Mar 28
0
oh323 to h323
Hi
Debian has a package for chan_oh323 (the original, external h323). It is
not maintaind for quite some time AFAIK and also AFAIK offers no real
atvantages over chan_h323. So I'd like to remove it.
Before I do that, I have some questions, as I'm not familiar with H.323
channels:
1. Are there any useful features oh323 supports that h323 doesn't? That
the version of h323 in 1.4.21