similar to: Evaluating Asterisk

Prior to upgrading from RH7.0 to RH7.3 our Samba filserver worked perfectly. Now we are having locking problems. Initially Iused the same samba binaries built on RH70, I tried rebuilding Samba and reinstalling but it had no effect. If user bon opens an M$-Office file they frequently get a 'file is already in use by bob'. Sure enough smbstatus -L shows the file locked by bob, but bob

I think I bought up this topic before, but I'd like to propose seriously removing the Native file format from LLD this time. IIUC, the Native file format was designed to be the fastest on-memory or on-disk file format for object files. The problem is that no one is working on that. No LLVM tools can produce object files in the Native, thus the feature of supporting the format is useless in

Hi! When i'm running debugfs.ocfs2 i get the following result: debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats" /dev/sdb Revision: 0.90 Mount Count: 0 Max Mount Count: 20 State: 0 Errors: 0 Check Interval: 0 Last Check: Mon May 10 12:17:37 2010 Creator OS: 0 Feature Compat: 3 backup-super strict-journal-super Feature Incompat: 8016 sparse

On 27 April 2010 19:16, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > IMHO, LLVM is the wrong > place to deal with these.  It should be done at a higher level. > It _can_ be done at the LLVM IR level, but much less conveniently. Now I agree with you, completely. ;) It is important, it is the future, but it is in the library/language definition space that the solution will be more

Hello list! How dangerous is acctually the --inplace option if you want to run rsync to update files that are only read and not written to? What is the worst that can happen? The file is not readable, the reader gets half the file of an old version and the rest is from the new version? There is not a simple way to make it update the file in the standard way and then change the ownership

I wonder if part of the reasoning behind moving klibc into the Kernel itself and integrating it with kbuild has to do with creating a common base system for the initramfs that is meant to work across all Linux distros? I'm very skeptical that such a thing can be created in a way that would satisfy everyone, and maintained peacefully with no forks. I've been helping Jeff Bailey of

On Tuesday 27 April 2010 13:56:05 Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 19:16, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > > IMHO, LLVM is the wrong > > place to deal with these.  It should be done at a higher level. > > It _can_ be done at the LLVM IR level, but much less conveniently. > > Now I agree with you, completely. ;) I suspect not. :) I still mean within

Hi, If I load 2 packages that have a function with the same name, how do I tell R to run one or the other? (Instead of having R automatically use the first- or last-loaded one, whichever it is. (Which is it, by the way.)) Cheers! Nick -- ==================================================== Nicholas J. Matzke Ph.D. Candidate, Graduate Student Researcher Huelsenbeck Lab Center for

Dear all, One can use ks.test(x,y) for a one-sample kolmogorov-smirnov test: x being the data sample y being a string specifying a distribution I notice the help on ks.test does not tell you how to get such a list. Is this a hole in my R knowledge? Where can I get a list of the strings specifying the possible distributions? and more specifically What would be the string and following

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:54:09PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > > I really would like to provide you more information about such > > workaround but I'm not aware of any ;-) I have not seen any issues like > > this when D3cold is properly implemented in the platform. That's why > > I'm bit skeptical that this has anything to do with specific Intel PCIe > >

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 20:26, ~mg@a.org wrote: > Hello everyone! > > We have been thinking about something<early snip> With respect, this could have come from anyone... and looks like it did from the DNS records. I appreciate it's not an easy situation, but there must be some way of doing this where it does not look like a scam? Tell tale signs: - Don't tell anyone about

A few days ago, someone asked me why I am using wxpp instead of SWIG. The question prompted me to revisit and re-evaluate SWIG, and I now believe it would be best to convert wxRuby to SWIG. SWIG has greatly improved its C++ support since the last time I looked at it, and I think its Ruby support has improved quite a bit as well. Also, now that I have written wxpp, I understand the nature of

I read the thread ( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/096115.html ). I think the wonderful feature of the MinGW/Cygwin ld is the option --enable-auto-import. The option is limited to COFF, but LINK.exe doesn't have it. Could we add the feature to lld-link ? If it is possible, many people will change the coding pattern for using DLL. -- no more if-def declspec(dllimport)

On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > For our back end, we absolutely do not want a type system without pointers - not only do we have separate registers for pointers, we also have separate instructions for manipulating them and representing this in SelectionDAG requires some very ugly hacks. This is also the case for several DSPs, which

Hi all, We are trying to upgrade to iptables 1.4.1+ however the ipp2p module now it is included in the xtables-addons modules. In the xtables-addons modules the commad line for ipp2p is changed and the -m ipp2p --ipp2p option is not supported anymore .... instead the maintainer requires that we use -m ipp2p --bit ... -m ipp2p --kaza for each different P2P protocol. as a result shorewall does

I sent a patch for review. I'll wait for a while, probably submit that tomorrow. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > I think I bought up this topic before, but I'd like to propose seriously > > removing the Native file format from LLD this

I've attached my initial thoughts on the design for the v2v tool. -- Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team M: +44 (0)7977 267231 GPG ID: D33C3490 GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490 -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: v2v-pseudo.txt URL:

Hello I noticed that starting with R version 3.3.0 onward, this generates a warning: ?? > txt <- c("a", "3.14") ?? > read.table(file = textConnection(txt), header = FALSE, colClasses = c(x = "character", y = "numeric")) the warning is "not all columns named in 'colClasses' exist" and I guess the change was made in response

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will >>> make