similar to: Asterisk send calls to SIP Trunks with Round Robin Call Distribution

Hello list. We just upgraded to 1.6.1.11. We are using real time information stored on mysql databases. That is all running fine. Now, since we upgraded, some member don't get calls from queues. In CLI: "queue show" shows something like: 611 (Local/611 at agents) with penalty 20 (realtime) (*In use*) has taken no calls yet We use the extension 611 in different computers, in the

I was wondering if anyone has an easy way to emulate dialing in a round robin fashion like when you use Zap/r1 for Zap trunks. At the moment what I do is simply make a macro that will dial the sip trunks in order so if the first one fails it goes to the second and so on. The problem with this approach is that the first few SIP trunks will always be busy because of outgoing traffic. Is there an

I am planning on dabbling with some VOIP providers. I was thinking of Teliax first. My thinking is that the first LD call would go to teliax and the second (etc.) calls would go out to the PSTN. I could then verify bandwidth and quality to decide when to add more trunks and to Internet connections. I have been doing some concept testing with FWD for toll free calls, but I am using 393 as a

Hello, We have 2 SIP trunks from Bandwidth.com and if both are in use and someone tries to dial out, they cause another call to get one-way audio (the caller hears us, we cannot hear them). This happens 100% of the time and Bandwidth.com doesn't offer any support. I don't see any setting that tells Asterisk that there are 2 channels available from Bandwidth.com's IP. I'm

Hello, I think I have encountered an odd bug in Siemens C460 IP/dect handsets, which is a bit annoying, and I'm not (yet) sure how to get round it without lots of hacks. Basically, on all external incoming calls, we set: exten => s,n,SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: Bellcore-dr2) This causes handsets (i.e. Cisco 7960 / Grandstream / aastra) to set a different ring cadence so to differentiate

I need help translating extensions.conf to AEL: [default] exten => _X.,1,Set(DID=${EXTEN:6}) exten => _X.,n,Goto(continue,1) exten => _1X.,1,Set(DID=${EXTEN:7}) exten => _1X.,n,Goto(continue,1) exten => continue,1,Noop(${DID}) exten => continue,n,Set(GROUP(IAX)=incoming) exten => continue,n,GotoIf($[${MATH(${GROUP_COUNT(incoming at IAX)}+${GROUP_COUNT(outgoing at

Hello, I''m new to the list and iproute2 itself. I was searching for a way to simultaneously use several IPs on the *same network interface* for outbound traffic. Let me explain: I have eth0 interface to which I set 2 IP addresses; 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. Then I want to connect to Internet through 192.168.0.254 gateway using round-robin between those 2 addresses. The iproute2

> > Hi All, > > > > Customer is requesting 1 incoming toll free #, that dial out to 4 > > different terminating numbers, not ring all at once but ring #1, then > > #2, then #3, then #4, then back to #1 consecutively on inbound calls, > > regardless if someone is on #1. So this is not like a hunt group, > > more like an agent queue set with a round-robin

Hi, Using ctdb, is it a valid setup to have : CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses containing only one ip address, thus with no round-robin. Is there a particular hard-coded limit that doesn't allow this? -- Nicolas Ecarnot

I want to add another server to my existing Samba environment and use DNS round robin to do load balancing. Both will use same smb.conf. Is anyone out there using this kind of setup? I have few quick questions: 1. Can "interfaces" statement be used in DNS round robin. If yes, then how? 2. Should "preferred master= yes" be defined on both boxes? Thanks.

This is posed as a question more that a statement, so if you can show that I'm wrong, please feel free to correct / flame me. A couple of years ago, I identified a file corruption issue caused by two people attempting to edit the same file via two different Samba servers. The file was in a shared file space, mounted on both Samba servers via NFS. The problem, I believe, lies in the fact

> From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> > Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion > Hi, > just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :) > > There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to > consider IPs or ports. > What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP > adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ? > It would solve both

Hello everybody, i have two gsm line (extra channels) and i'd like to schedule the outgoing calls with a round-robin strategy. If all the gsm lines are busy, the call must be sent to the pri lines with a linear strategy. here is the dialplan: exten => gsm,ChanIsAvail(EXTRA/r2&DAHDI/g1) same => n,GotoIf($["${AVAILORIGCHAN}" = ""]?unavail,1) same =>

Hi, Anyone knows if there is a way to play a list of sound file in a round robin mode (at specific interval) while someone in waiting in moh in a queue? Ok, you enter a queue and wait listening to moh, every X minutes a sound file is played from a list of sound files to be played. If that possible and if so how? Thanks for any pointers. Andre

Hello All, I've encountered a problem with OpenSSH_3.7.1p2 and krb5 authentication that I did not have using previous OpenSSH versions and krb5. I have a group of machines that are all listed as addresses for hostname.domain.blah via round-robin dns. When attempting to ssh to hostname.here.blah using krb5 auth, I get the following error: (client side) debug1: Authentications that can

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Additional Comments From dleonard at vintela.com 2005-06-08 22:16 ------- a workaround at http://blog.macnews.de/unspecific/stories/4581/ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sxw.org.uk ------- Comment #5 from simon at sxw.org.uk 2006-08-19 08:28 ------- There isn't an easy fix for this, at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Comment #7 from jan.iven at cern.ch 2006-10-24 02:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=1202) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1202&action=view) (simplified patch - no config option) Given that the GSSAPI library will (unconditionally) use DNS anyway, perhaps we don't need yet another client-side config

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wilkinson <simon at sxw.org.uk> 2007-09-15 20:59:25 --- I've noted this on the mailing list too, but just for the record, the simplified patch is incorrect. GSSAPI != Kerberos, and even within the Kerberos space, some vendors ship with canonicalisation disabled. If we are going to ship a workaround for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 DarioP <pellegrini.dario at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pellegrini.dario at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from DarioP <pellegrini.dario at gmail.com> --- (In reply to