similar to: meetme() and dahdi_dummy on an embedded system

I'm playing around with an ALIX 2D2 board (http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d2.htm). It's a fanless, x86 system using an AMD Geode processor with 256MB of RAM. Also available are two network interfaces, two USB ports and one serial port (no keyboard or VGA). I'm using the Voyage Linux distro, which basically is Debian Lenny optimized for this board. Asterisk 1.6.1.12 runs fine on the

Hello there: I think I have a silly kernel configuration problem. I'm running: * vanilla 2.6.27.10 kernel built from source * dahdi-2.1.0.4 built from source So far so good, dahdi module loads just fine: dahdi: Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 dahdi: Version: 2.1.0.4 when I try to: hal04 dahdi # modprobe dahdi_dummy FATAL: Error inserting dahdi_dummy

Usually I used real Digium cards in asterisk systems, so I'm running into this for the first time. dahdi_tool reports that dahdi_dummy is in state UNCONFIGURED. This isn't super surprising, as it seems like the configuration files for DAHDI are really intended only for configuring real physical cards. But that begs the question: Is there any legal DAHDI configuration for dahdi_dummy such

> > Hello - how do I setup the echo cancellers for dahdi if I am only using the > dummy driver (no hardware)? I'm using a SIP only environment with echo > problems.Thanks, > Carlos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090128/aad3e3ce/attachment.htm

Is there a method or can there be a method added to dahdi to only compile for dadhi_dummy? No other modules are needed sometimes. no firmware downloads are needed. Thanks, Jerry

On 2014-12-04 08:55, George wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote: > >> I love the idea of a low-power high-performance appliance. A NAS will >> work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least >> none that I'm aware of and would trust.] >> >> Even appliances sorta like this, that

Hi, I have some servers that are dedicated to do meetme conferencing. From some previous test i concluded that I need to use dahdi_dummy as it is more accurate. If I did use the core timers in dahdi (not loading dahdi_dummy) I got bad quality in the conferences and dahdi_test showed 99.6% as worst. I thought maybe the issue as bad hardware for the timing or something else. But today I

Hi Rob, please stay on list. Otherwise I will charge you :-) By the way I have no problem to get payed. > Hi Harry, > > The one very obvious difference is the result of this command: # > ldapsearch -xLLL -b dc=afrika,dc=xx -s sub -D > cn=admin,dc=afrika,dc=xx -w 'sambadomainname=*' > dn: sambaDomainName=SCHULE,dc=afrika,dc=xx > > I get dn:

OS: Debian squeeze Samba: 3.5.6 # testparm --section-name=global -s 2>&1|grep ALIX returns nothing # grep ALIX /etc/samba/smb.conf netbios name = ALIX works -- Regards Harry Jede

Hello, I just set up Debian Lenny on a PCEngines ALIX. This board have a GeodeLX processor with hardware crypto accelerator, so I patched my kernel to get cryptodev support. Everything is fine when playin with openssl, but openssh just crash when a large amount of data is transfered. A small example: alix:~# scp 100meg.test localhost:/dev/null root at localhost's password: 100meg.test

hai, im still on holiday but i did see some things a bit, also in addition about the smb.conf in classic mode dns forwarder is predecated, so i suggest avoiding the option. this part, you set ssl off but also set the ports to the ssl ports. ldap ssl = off ldap passwd sync = yes /etc/ldap/ldap.conf BASE dc=mydomain URI ldap://sam3dc.mydomain ldap://sam3dc.mydomain:666 use URI

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > Tbh, you might get away with using PCEngines' APU boards (the successor > to their Alix boards with a massively upgraded CPU) if individual > machines don't need RAID (because everything is replicated anyway). > I considered that, but what would you use for storage?? They have an mSATA

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote: > I love the idea of a low-power high-performance appliance. A NAS will > work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the > price. > >

Hi Harry, When I install slapd , I didn't get the option to use MDB, so used hdb I went through your suggestions and cleaned up the smb.conf. Also added the unixidpool ldif dn: sambaDomainName=mydomain,dc=mydomain sambaDomainName: mydomain sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3936576374-1604348213-1812434911 sambaAlgorithmicRidBase: 1000 objectClass: sambaDomain objectClass: sambaUnixIdPool

Hi to all. I'm trying to use meetme on asterisk 1.4.22.1. On a debian i've compiled (as i need h323 support) openh323_v1_18_0 pwlib_v1_10_0 dahdi-linux-2.1.0.3 dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2 asterisk-1.4.22.1 All works fine, dahdi status is: asterik:/data/programmi# /etc/init.d/dahdi status ### Span 1: DAHDI_DUMMY/1 "DAHDI_DUMMY/1 (source: RTC) 1" (MASTER) asterik:/data/programmi#

I've been thinking about this for 2 years. I held back waiting for samba 4 DC stability. It was a mistake to wait this long. It seems that AD DC functionality in samba for is really good -- and stable. I was thinking of using Intel NUC devices for this. I am running a school with 3 campuses and about 800 students and 200 facutly of a zotac box running samba 4.1.x. I would love to collaborate

On 2014-12-05 04:37, George wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > >> Tbh, you might get away with using PCEngines' APU boards (the successor >> to their Alix boards with a massively upgraded CPU) if individual >> machines don't need RAID (because everything is replicated anyway). >> > > I

Has anybody tried running Xen on an ALIX 2D3 board? http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d3.htm If not, has anybody ran Xen on a seriously underpowered PC? The reason why I love these boards so much is that they run at 5W! Of course, I would only run Xen on these for testing purposes. It would just be nice to have a very low powered system that I can just "blow away" VMs when I

Hi all, I have successfully compiled and installed Asterisk on an Alix board (AMD Geode 500 Mhz + 256 Mb RAM) on top of Voyage linux (a Debian variant). I'm using it at home for a month. I wondered how much it could be loaded, so I tested it with pbx-test: I could place up to 15 simultaneous SIP calls before it got no more responsive. All in all a good, stable and cheap solution for home

I have a working setup with samba & squid on one machine. However it seems that ntlm_auth is not doing what I expected. As an unprivilegd user I am able to test succesfull password: ute at alix:~$ ntlm_auth -V Version 3.5.6 ute at alix:~$ ntlm_auth --username=hans --password=keins NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0) Surely I know this password. Now the same with diagnostics on: ute at