similar to: Caller hang up not detected

Hi, I'm having trouble getting feature codes to work in Asterisk 1.4.21.2. Features.conf contians this: blindxfer=## atxfer=*2 automon=*1 disconnect=** I'm really most interested in getting disconnect to work so that I hear "Goodbye" when I press ** during a call connected this way in my dial plan: exten => 1,n,Dial(SIP/14168724765 at 6135551212-sw1|120|gtT) exten =>

Hi, I'm having trouble getting feature codes to work in Asterisk 1.4.21.2. Features.conf contians this: blindxfer=## atxfer=*2 automon=*1 disconnect=** I'm really most interested in getting disconnect to work so that I hear "Goodbye" when I press ** during a call connected this way in my dial plan: exten => 1,n,Dial(SIP/14168724765 at 6135551212-sw1|120|gtT) exten =>

Hi, I have trouble getting MOH to work after an upgrade from asterisk 1.4 to 1.6.1.4. The call goes on hold, MOH is started, and then stops right away. Here are the files both of type .raw: Tsunami*CLI> moh show files Class: default File: /etc/asterisk/musiconhold/Fr?d?ric Chopin - Polonaises Op. 40-2 File: /etc/asterisk/musiconhold/Fr?d?ric Chopin - Polonaises Op. 40-1 These files

Hi all, I need some help, advice or whatever you can explain to me because I haven''t got a clear idea about how to do the following assembly, and I''d be very grateful if I got some help from an expert like you. I''m trying to build a system which represents the following: I''ve got a hosts unit (host1, host 2, ...) which have IP in the network 192

1. I get the following error when I run “puppet device’ err: Could not request certificate: Could not write /var/opt/lib/pe-puppet/devices/certname/ssl/private_keys/certname.pem to privatekeydir: Permission denied - /var/opt/lib/pe-puppet/devices/certname/ssl/private_keys/certname.pem Any thought? Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Each register is a 4-component (namely, r, g, b, a) vector register. They are actually defined as llvm packed [4xfloat]. The instruction: add_sat r0.a, r1_bias.xxyy, r3_x2.zzzz Explaination: '.a' is a writemask. only the specified component will be update '.xxyy' and '.zzzz' are swizzle masks, specify the component permutation, simliar to the Intel SSE permutation

need help trying to figure out why calls hang when using multple ports on Sangoma card. we have 1 quad card with 3 T1 ports configured, Port1 acts as connection to teleco (to our T1 PRI) port 2 connects second system and routes calls to port1 port 3 is Asterisk pbx calls all go in and out properly but sometimes we get a call hang on when both sides hangup. this causes all calls to fail until

Actually the problems that Tzu-Chien Chiu are encountering are similar to what should be done for generating SSE code in the X86 backend and also other SIMD instruction sets. I think LLVM neeeds to add instructions for permuting components, extracting and injecting elements in packed types. If the architecture has instructions which can do permutations for each instruction (for example

I have to register asterisk/sip with a sipproxy that does not support authentication, I do not know how to tell Asterisk not to send authentication request? # sip.conf [general] insecure=very permit=207.148.115.10/255.255.255.0 [myproxy] type=friend host=217.118.115.10 context=from-sip # Logging: <--- Reliably Transmitting (NAT) to 207.148.115.10:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 407 Proxy

Hello, I need some results from the survival analysis of my data that I do not know whether exist in Survival Package or how to obtain if they do: 1. The Mean survival time 2. The standard error of the mean 3. Point and 95% Lower & Upper Confidence Intervals estimates Any help will be greatly appreciated. Cem [[alternative HTML version

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:44:51PM +0000, Yang, Philip wrote: > > > On 2019-10-29 3:25 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:22:37PM +0000, Yang, Philip wrote: > >> Hi Jason, > >> > >> I did quick test after merging amd-staging-drm-next with the > >> mmu_notifier branch, which includes this set changes. The test result >

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:22:37PM +0000, Yang, Philip wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I did quick test after merging amd-staging-drm-next with the > mmu_notifier branch, which includes this set changes. The test result > has different failures, app stuck intermittently, GUI no display etc. I > am understanding the changes and will try to figure out the cause. Thanks! I'm not

cleanup PAGE_SHIFT operation and replacing ttm_resource resource->start with cursor start using amdgpu_res_first API. v1 -> v2: reorder patch sequence v2 -> v3: addressing review comment v2 Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 10 +++++++--- 2

SetUp: - Asterisk behind a NAT, - Red Hat 9.0 - Asterisk 1.2.14 My Asterisk box is behind a NAT and I have a DiD from an ITSP. I have my dial plan set up so that when outside callers dial the DiD, the call is answered by my auto-attendant. The caller can then select who they'd like to speak to and the call is transferred to the external line associated with that person (usually a mobile

On 2019-11-01 1:42 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:59:26PM +0000, Yang, Philip wrote: >>> This test for range_blockable should be before mutex_lock, I can move >>> it up >>> >> yes, thanks. > > Okay, I wrote it like this: > > if (mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range)) > mutex_lock(&adev->notifier_lock); >

cleanup PAGE_SHIFT operation and replacing ttm_resource resource->start with cursor start using amdgpu_res_first API. v1 -> v2: reorder patch sequence Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 11 ++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 10 +++++++--- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6

On 2019-11-01 11:12 a.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:44:51PM +0000, Yang, Philip wrote: >> >> >> On 2019-10-29 3:25 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:22:37PM +0000, Yang, Philip wrote: >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> I did quick test after merging amd-staging-drm-next with the

Dear All, I have the following data coming out from s <- with(final, summarize(norm, llist(gtt,fdiab), function(norm) { n <- sum(!is.na(norm)) s <- sum(norm, na.rm=T) binconf(s, n) }, type='matrix') ) ie gtt fdiab norm.norm norm.norm2 norm.norm3 18

On 2019-10-28 4:10 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> > > find_vma() must be called under the mmap_sem, reorganize this code to > do the vma check after entering the lock. > > Further, fix the unlocked use of struct task_struct's mm, instead use > the mm from hmm_mirror which has an active mm_grab. Also the mm_grab > must be

Hi, I have a quick question regarding estimation of a truncation regression model (truncated above at 1) using MLE in R. I will be most grateful to you if you can help me out. The model is linear and the relationship is "dhat = bhat0+Z*bhat+e", where dhat is the dependent variable >0 and upper truncated at 1; bhat0 is the intercept; Z is the independent variable and is a uniform