similar to: Lagged Extension

Hi, My bridging stops when I start a third Xen domain !?!? I have a few domains setup (mail, wiki, pbx). If I start two domains bridge networking works great. But if I start a third, either the new domains does not work or one of the other DomUs stops working! By stop working I mean I can''t route traffic outside of Dom0. I have been looking at this on and off for a couple of weeks.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=837 Summary: Large ICMP packets are lost Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

A most puzzling network conundrum has arisen while I was attempting to create a virtual network behind a virtual router which in turn connects the virtual network to my real network. My machine (192.168.103.23) is on the network with my router (192.168.103.1). The virtual router, tiara, has to connect my 192.168.103.* network with the virtual 10.0.0.* network which comprises two other virtual

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

I was wondering if anyone knows how accurate the values are when you do a "sip show peers" from the CLI. My configuration is: Asterisk box (192.168.1.102) -> gigabit switch <- PC running x-lite (192.168.1.100) the CLI reports 101 ms delay however, ping is showing <1ms delay Where is the extra 100ms coming from? The softphone response? Here is a dump of some data: CLI>

Laine I made the change and I can now ping across both bridges: br1 (192.168.0.0/24) and br1600 (192.168.1.0/24): br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500         inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>         ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

Hello, i'm trying to setup a samba file server, but i need your advices. the goal of my setup is to share a folder from a linux server to windows clients (for the moment i do my tests using smbclient on linux hosts). The server and the client are on different subnets, but they can ping themselves. Samba is installed on the server (192.168.0.1/24), and smbclient is available on the

Try to ping from client to server with its hostname. Sounds like dns problem. ping server Then try to ping its ip address. Then try to add server address to host file. Ex 192.168.8.30 server.example.com[1] server Best M On May 26, 2016 12:02, "Nico Speelman" <nico at speelmanrobben.nl[2]> wrote: Hello, I've been trying to add a new server to my Samba 4 Active directory, but

On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:03:51 +0000 Stephen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello I wonder if anyone here could possibly help me? I am using > Samba version 4.5.16-Debian (version information taken from sudo > smbstatus) on Raspbian and attempting to prototype some future > network infrastructure with a couple of Raspberry Pis. > > So far I have sucessfully

Hi Laine What you have suggested sounds eminently reasonable. Thanks for your advice. I'm going to give it a shot and report back. Richard On 11/27/19 1:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: >> Hello >> >> I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. >> >> Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts

Dear forum members, What is the formula to calculate denominator degrees of freedom (den df) for nonlinear mixed-effect models with covariates? My model is similar to a CO2 uptake example from Pinheiro and Bates (2000, page 376). In this CO2 dataset, there are two treatments and two types (84 observations in total), but den df for each parameter of the model is 64. Isn’t it too high? Your

HI, I''m having trouble with a debian etch HVM domU inside a dom0 domu >From domU, I try to ping gateway, but response time change if tcpdump is writing to standard output. Ping without tcpdump running has a 4 ms time. While tcpdump is writing in stdout, in another terminal: # ping -n -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1

Am 22.06.2020 um 17:41 schrieb Marek Greško: Hi > try pinging your sip peer ip address following way: > > ping -n -M do -s 1300 -i 0.1 -c 100 ${ipaddress} > > Post several lines and the statistics. root at bpi:/etc/asterisk# ping -n -M do -s 1300 -i 0.1 -c 100 tel.t-online.de PING tel.t-online.de (217.0.128.133) 1300(1328) bytes of data. 1308 bytes from 217.0.128.133:

Hi ALL, Here is a weird problem comfusing me for a long time. i''v installed xen 4.0.1 with linux kernel 3.1.0-rc9+ Everything works fine except i cannot ping to the gateway in a PVM domU. i''v installed bridge-utils and brctl show like this bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.00219b480d56 no

Hello, I''m using Linux kernel 2.6.x and tc (from iproute2 package). I''m trying to use HTB or HFSC scheduler in order to limite the rate of outgoing packets and also in order to minimiez delay for RTP stream. But I didn''t suceed in having this 2 QoS services working. I use Iptables in order to classify packets. Here is my HFSC conf. In fact the pings that i send from

I'm not *entirely* sure but this began happening at about the time I installed the latest kernel updates for CentOS 5.1 (kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.i686.rpm from January 24). Shortly before that I changed the encryption on my wireless router and switched from ndiswrapper back to the standard bcm43xx driver, but I'm pretty sure the network was OK before that update for the simple reason that

Hi, There seems to be a problem with the timer resolution on x86_64. This is clear in ping results - I don't know if it's just a ping problem or if it manifests elsewhere as well. It does also affect mtr and traceroute times. I guess it's more a kernel issue than a CentOS problem, but is anyone else seeing the same? Ping results have a resolution of 10ms - so a ping <10ms

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To: