Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "solution for NAT issues?"
2006 Apr 13
2
NAT/STUN Server
Hi,
I am trying to register SIP clients which are behind NAT on different
network. In order to achieve this goal I think I need STUN Server . I
downloaded STUN Server from
http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stun/stund_0.96_Aug13.tgz
But I don't know how to install/configure it.
And please advice me that STUN server is good idea for this scenario?
Thanks in advance
Wazb
2010 Sep 28
2
NAT issue (i think?)
Hi All.
got this problem that IP phones could not re-register to my server. even
if device is power cycled it still would not register. the solution i
found was to change the SIP port settings on the phone and it will
register. but after registration expires and its time to re-register the
same thing will happen, so i have to update the port settings again just
to make it work which is
2005 Oct 12
8
SIP behind NAT to pub Asterisk, best solution?
What is the best solution? I dont want to have modify firewall's at all or
do port fowarding. Ideally I would like a solution that with either a
softphone or wireless hardphone one could connect via friends, family, or
hotspots without reconfiguring their devices.
What are people using? STUN? SER?
Thanks in advance!
-blake
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2005 Sep 13
2
Nat & Sip & Pain
Hi everyone,
I decided to have a look at SIP & NAT again and I've been at it for a
[quite a] few hours but typically nothing is working for me. Actually
I'm not sure if SIP and NAT can ever work but some emails on this list
do suggest that someone has got it working, once, maybe.
I'm experimenting with a ZyXEL 2000W [WiFi Sip phone] which supports
"Outbound Proxy",
2005 Sep 14
2
STUN vs NAT Helper
I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly
interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if
your recommendations are within the open source arena.
Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and
possibly as a SIP server for a portion of our user base. We prefer to
have Asterisk in the mix because of the additional
2006 Nov 06
7
several behind NAT
I've got my asterisk server in the DMZ of my local LAN - I've used my
Budgetone and GXP2000's from the Internet- on direct IP connections
with no problems. However, I'm about to deploy about 5 phones
(either budgetone or GXP2000's) all on a LAN behind a NAT- on a
different network than the Asterisk server. Should I look into using
STUN servers? Will this setup be a
2004 Feb 03
1
GS and NAT
Hi all.
Is it at all possible to have a GS B101 NATed with firmware 1.0.4.40?
I've tried both STUN and not STUN. The odds seems best with stun because
the phone registers with right ip adress.
When the connection is made * sends rtp packets to the right destination
AND port, but the phone doesn't accept the packets.....
Should I burn my D-LINK 604 or upgrade the GS?
/t
2004 Jul 15
1
*, NAT & STUN
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040715/b37cee4b/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
?
Hi friends
I have some doubt in connecting my firefly3rd party softphone from windows machine to asterisk server in linux .
My asterisk is behind the "Port Restricted NAT". I am using STUN server to cross the
2005 May 31
2
Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working
Hi,
I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to
Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura
is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings
on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind
Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just
fine, but I can't hear
2005 Mar 28
1
Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate
Guys.
Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of
ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about
handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat.
I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 10000-20000
for rtp and 4569 for iax2) but still.. I can quite figure out what ser and
stund have to do on this
2007 Nov 22
1
NAT keep-alive
Hi,
On my linksys/sipura phones/ATA, there is a setting called "NAT
Mapping Enable" and another called "NAT Keep Alive Enable"
These settings must be on in my setup so that my phones/ATA remain
connected to my * server. My setup is:
Home LAN - Pfsense (NAT, Dynamic Public IP)- Internet - PFsense (1-to-1
NAT, Static public IP) - Asterisk server.
I was wondering:
2004 May 28
1
Immortal SIP & NAT problem
Hi guies,
I know I know this subject have been The most written subject about VoIP
Right... but I just want to make clear, just one time !
If Asterisk is on a Public IP Address and a softphone behind the nat,
sip.conf must contains for this phone: nat=yes ....
Now if I want to configure my sipphone (X-Lite) placing behing the NAT,
it must have in "Domain/Realm" the external IP
2005 Jan 27
3
SIP + NAT = horrible mess
Hi Guys,
After days of fiddling, I can't really get my SIP device to work
communicate with Asterisk behind NAT. Sometimes the STUN server is
flaky, sometimes the device isn't reachable if the connection is dropped
and then put back on, sometimes it registers OK, sometimes it doesn't, etc.
I've come to the same conclusion as the wiki: it's probably better to
avoid this
2006 Nov 07
3
connect Sipura with Asterisk - both behind NAT
Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both
behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather
(especially IAX), I need something more reliable.
I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link
explaining how to setup Linux server
--
#Joseph
2003 Oct 30
1
NAT type router database?
Is anybody aware of a database containing the types of nat
implementation in todays soho/consumer routers? I think it would make
sense for the community to have this database in order to avoid
symmetric nats.
If one such thing does not exist how about starting this database?
A stunclient for linux can be found at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/
I can contribute this information for two
2006 Dec 23
1
SNOM 200 behind NAT and other xmas woes
I decided to give the whole family IP phones for christmas,
all hooked into my asterisk server, so all the nephews can
have their own lines.
However, one of the phones I got was the SNOM 200. That's worked
fine for me on my own network, but I'm having bad luck getting
it to work behind NAT talking to Asterisk. It talks to my
termination/origination provider, which seems to ruthlessly
2005 Oct 11
2
nat and wandering phones
Hi all I'm looking for a solution to this problem.
*box--------internet-----------nat-----------softphone
We have potential customers who will be travelling the world with
laptops/pda's.
They need to be able to connect to the asterisk box via ip wherever they
are and will have no control over nat whatsoever.
I have read that STUN offers this service, but cannot picture in my mind
how
2005 May 24
3
Budgetone and NAT not working
I have a couple of Budgetones that I am playing with trying to get them
to work with * from a remote network over the Internet (yes NAT joy!).
My * server is in my DMZ and I have 5060 and my RTP range forwarded
(UDP) to my public address (through a Cisco PIX). Internally, I can
setup my budgetone, it registers and works great. I then have a Linksys
router connected to another Internet
2003 Apr 23
6
OT: Multiple SIP phones behind NAT gateway?
Hi,
I know this is slightly off topic but I figured the knowlege here is probably the best on the subject..
I want to setup remote offices with 4 to 6 SIP phones (SNOM 200) using ADSL and the internet to connect to the Asterisk box..
These phone will be behind an ADSL router using NAT...
I don't want to setup another Asterisk system in each office so IAX is not an option..
I could use
2003 Mar 05
6
Known SIP - NAT Solutions?
I have recently begun experimenting with Asterisk, and have been
mightily impressed by its capabilities and flexibility. I have run
across one problem, however, that challenges my ability to use it as a
production system.
My Asterisk box has a public Internet IP, and works great with SIP
(ATA 186) clients that also have public IP addresses. Unfortunately,
most of the locations that I would