Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Trouble registering Cisco 7942"
2008 Mar 02
0
Cisco 7970 - register with NAT phone
continuing discussions of 79xx issues. i've seen referenced and am
experiencing difficulty getting a 7970 to work behind NAT to a public
asterisk server. i am successful with 7960s.
1. SIP load is 70.8-3-3SR2S
2. config works fine if 7970 is connecting to an asterisk server a
local LAN (same subnet)
3. when debugging it in a NAT'd environment I see the register and
2012 Jan 15
0
configuring a Cisco 7961 so that different line appearances register to different SIP proxy addresses
Hi,
I have been using Cisco 7960's with Asterisk for years. I am trying get a
7961 working and have a problem. In my configuration, not all of my line
appearances register to the same Asterisk SIP server. I have an Asterisk
server at home and another at work. My Line 1 button registers to the home
server and my Line 2 button registers to the work server. This has worked
for years
2008 Jan 25
2
Unprovisioned 7961
Hi Everyone,
I am having some issues getting my 7961 working with Trixbox. I have loaded
the SIP code (8-3-3SR2) fine but when the phone boots up it goes into an
unprovisioned state. A status message shows up and says ?Error Verifying
Config Info?.
I have read quite a bit on this topic (getting 7961?s to work with Asterisk
and TB) and only came across a few postings where other people
2011 Mar 02
1
Registering Cisco 7942G IP phone with Asterisk!.
Hi,
?
We are new to IP phone firmware upgradation (Sorry if it is a re-post of previous question(s)).
?
Recently we have bought a cisco 7942G IP phone.
It currently has SIP 42.9-0-2SR1S firmware loaded on it.
We do not see any option to configure a SIP Proxy where we can provide SIP Server (Asterisk PC/Device)? IP address (with current firmware on it) to register it with Asterisk.
?
Do we need to
2010 Sep 03
0
Asterisk processing URI's
How does asterisk process URI's that get sent to it?
I am having a issue with a Cisco phone, where 99% works except the call
forwarding. The phone issues a X-cisco-serviceuri-cfwdall which can be seen
when running a sip debug on the peer directly. However the system tries to
lookup the request as a extension, aka
X-cisco-serviceuri-cfwdall-<extension>
And of course can't find this
2014 Dec 05
2
Inbound call from sip peer to internal webrtc peer fails while internal sip-webrtc calls work
Hello,
I'd appreciate your comments on the following problem I'm having, please
forgive me if this is something obvious, I've been scratching my head on
this for a while:
I have Asterisk+Kamailio setup where I'm currently testing inbound calls
from outside. I have both webrtc and sip clients, where webrtc peers are
defined according to sip.js instructions (
2014 Dec 05
0
Inbound call from sip peer to internal webrtc peer fails while internal sip-webrtc calls work
On 05/12/14 16:46, Olli Heiskanen wrote:
> INVITE that Asterisk (at port 5070) receives:
> PU.BL.IC.IP:5060 > PU.BL.IC.IP:5070: SIP, length: 1046
> INVITE sip:660 at testers.com
> <mailto:sip%3A660 at testers.com>;transport=UDP SIP/2.0
> Record-Route: <sip:PU.BL.IC.IP;lr=on;ftag=41030177>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>
2016 Feb 15
2
Asterisk 13.6.0/The simplest TCP configuration does not work
Does this help:
Session Initiation Protocol (REGISTER)
Request-Line: REGISTER sip:1.2.3.4;transport=TCP SIP/2.0
Method: REGISTER
Request-URI: sip:1.2.3.4;transport=TCP
Request-URI Host Part: 1.2.3.4
[Resent Packet: False]
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.15:47053
;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-5e3d9f441f1de1d3-1---d8754z-;rport;transport=TCP
2015 Jan 08
4
Asterisk 13.1.0/PJSIP peer IP address issue
Thank you for your note, Scott.
I set rewrite_contact=yes for both contacts, and I also had to do
remove_existing=yes because I had to remove the existing contact
information (max_contacts = 1 was preventing new contact information)
using pjsip
qualify demo-alice etc., after which the right IP addresses showed in pjsip
show endpoints. Anyway, it works as expected now, I think. My pjsip.conf is
2016 Feb 15
2
Asterisk 13.6.0/The simplest TCP configuration does not work
Thanks for the mighty quick response, Joshua!
I am using Zoiper on Linux softclient:
REGISTER sip:<ipAddr>;transport=TCP SIP/2.0
Changed the port back to 5060.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:
> Sonny Rajagopalan wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> *CLI> pjsip set logger on
>> PJSIP Logging enabled
>> [Feb 15
2014 Mar 31
1
Video calls using Cisco phones are 176x144(QCIF) and 15FPS both ways
We are experiencing an issue with our Cisco 9971 and 8945 phones where H264
video calls are connecting at 176x144 resolution instead of 640x480. Soft
clients can connect at higher resolutions and the 9971 can even receive
video at a higher resolution (although it still sends 176x144).
I contacted one of the developers and he suggested the passthrough of SDP
attributes is not working correctly.
2011 Sep 25
1
DID and the Caller ID for outgoing
Hi All;
I do not know if the SEP_Mac_address.cnf.xml of the cisco file is also has effecting on the DID and Caller ID to appear at the destination, because I found the following:
<localCfwdEnable>true</localCfwdEnable>
<semiAttendedTransfer>true</semiAttendedTransfer>
<anonymousCallBlock>2</anonymousCallBlock>
2014 Aug 06
1
From and To headers contain same account in INVITEs
Hello,
I noticed a strange thing while testing my Asterisk-Kamailio Realtime
setup. In an INVITE the From and To headers contain the same number when
calling through a Realtime integration setup. This happens when the INVITE
leaves Asterisk.
Can you guys tell me what might be causing this? I have 660 at testers.com as
a websocket client and 700 at testers.com (caller) using a Zoiper client (db
2015 Jan 09
0
Asterisk 13.1.0/PJSIP peer IP address issue
Well, I thought it worked, but it actually doesn't--I am able to get the
caller pick up the phone, but for some reason, I cannot hear anything on
either side no matter who does the calling. Again, my two SIP phones are on
the local 192.168.1.0/24 network (do not go over the Internet) and the
Asterisk server is located in the same network (not accessed over the
Internet). Any help is
2009 Oct 15
1
OT - Can't upgrade Cisco 7942 to SIP
Hi,
I've downloaded for a demo, a P0S3-08-12.zip file which is suppose to work
with 7960.
Is it supposed to be the same file that the one needed to 7942 model ?
At the moment, my 7942 is blocked when trying to download a
P0S3-8-12-00.loads file.
Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2009 Oct 22
1
Can't configure Cisco 7942 avec factory reset
Hi,
(I think) I followed instructions here (
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Firmware+issues+on+7940+-+7960 section
"Notes added Nov 2005, revised May 2006:"
at the bottom of the page) to factory reset a Cisco 7942 I wanted to
configure to SIP firmware.
When booting, I can see this requesting and obtaining file
term42.default.loads from TFTP server.
Then it would send a request
2005 Jun 15
0
(PR#7942) extra spaces before imag part when printing complex numbers
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> This is intentional: it aligns the numbers. E.g.
>
> >options(width=12)
> >print(c(1+1i, 1-10i, 1+100i))
> [1] 1+ 1i
> [2] 1- 10i
> [3] 1+100i
>
> Neat, eh?
>
> What made you think this was a bug?
Ah ok, I've misunderstood this feature probably perhaps
because, at first sight, I found the display looks "strange"
2013 Feb 15
6
Cisco 7942 Connected line ID
Hi,
Is it working for anyone?
I have tried with
trustrpid=yes
sendrpid=yes/pai
but can not get it working, Asterisk cli shows prevented message like this.
Connected line update to SIP/1231-00000200 prevented
Regards,
Zohair Raza
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2007 Jan 20
3
Cisco 7970 Unprovisioned
Hi!
I did manage to load phone with SIP image : SIP70.8-0-3S, made
SEP-MAC.cnf.xml, but phone never read the configuration from it.
On the screen it's written "Unprovisioned", and phone is not trying to
register with asterisk.
Please help!!
MihaelaMJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: