Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "G729 in asterisk upgrade issue"
2003 Jul 11
8
G729 codec problems
Hi I seem to have installed the G729 codec properly
but can't seem to get it to work ..
in the Asterisk startup I see ..
[codec_g729b.so] => (Annex B (floating point) G.729/PCM16 Codec Translator)
== Detected 1 licensed G.729 transcoders
WARNING[1074408160]: File translate.c, Line 218 (calc_cost): Translator
'g729tolinb' does not produce sample frames.
== Registered translator
2006 Jun 02
20
Prices of g729 codec
Hi, does anyone know the prices for g729 codecs from Digium? I sent an
email a while ago to them but haven't got any response so far.
Prices are per unit or volume?
Thanks,
--
-------------------------------------------
Erick Perez
Linux User 376588
http://counter.li.org/ (Get counted!!!)
Panama, Republic of Panama
2009 Jul 01
4
g729a compatibility
Hello!
I have a sip device that is sending in the SDP:
rtpmap:98 g729a
It does not seem like Asterisk is negotiating the codec properly,
because while the call rings, the rtp lines fail. However, on other
sip devices that have "rtpmap:18 g729" in their SDP, things work fine
with Digium's commercial g729 license.
How do I get "98 g729a" recognized by Asterisk?
Thanks,
2006 Jun 01
4
G729, voicemail, no codec_g729
I am trying to create a %100 g729 (with no transcoding) system (using a
Soekris, of course). I am running AstLinux with the native sounds, g729
is the only codec allowed, %100 SIP (g729 only allow=) - I think I am
covering all of my bases.
I have only "format=g729" in voicemail.conf. On an incoming call to a
mailbox, everything goes well until recording the message. When the
2012 Jun 05
1
G729 and voice mail
I am trying to figure out the best way to deal with this. I want all of the
calls in the network to be G729 and this is working. I do have hardware
that provides me 30 g729 licenses. I am setting each extensions to
disallow=all and allow=g729. However when I have this setup, I get no voice
mail prompts. I tried setting to disallow=all and allow=g729,alaw and I
still have no audio when calling
2007 Jan 08
2
G729 license counting
Hello,
How many licenses to buy?? :
From what we understood from digium website, we must buy as many
licenses as the number of maximum simultaneous calls using G729 Codec we
wish to make.
For example, If we want to be able to make a maximum of 10 simultaneous
calls using G729 Codec, we must buy 10 licenses.
Is it right?
Thanks you
2006 Mar 02
7
G729 and Meetme
I have noticed that when I try to connect multiple G729 VoIP devices into a MeetMe conference that I can only add up to the number of G729 licenses I have. Now I would think that because all the devices are G729, this wouldn't be the case and the only license that would ever be used would be if a non G729 device or Zap channel was a part of the Meetme conference. This is apparently note the
2007 Jul 01
2
G729 , upgrade asterisk
I'm planning to upgrade my asterisk 1.4.4 to 1.4.6.
usually for asterisk upgrade i delete modules directory and include, then compile the new version.
Since i have couple of G729 Licenses on this server installed, would i need to call Digium to reactivate these Licenses?
Is there any better and faster way of upgrade asterisk?
Possibly without losing G729 License?
Thanks!
2003 Dec 16
28
codec negotiation
Hi list,
I'm with a little problem on codec negotiation between a cisco827 and
asterisk.
My sip.conf is like that:
[general]
port = 5060
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
context = default
amaflags = default
allow=g729
allow=gsm
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
;disallow=all
and cisco like that:
dial-peer voice 6 voip
destination-pattern 0T
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:<asterisk-ip>
2005 Oct 07
2
Teliax users, g729 question
I am using Teliax to terminate my calls, and I have 3 licenses' for
g729 from Digium. "show translations" verifies that the registration
took place.
When I place a call, having "allow=g729" as the only allow option in
iax.conf, I get the following error:
WARNING[361]: chan_iax2.c:6017 socket_read: Call rejected by
208.139.204.228: Unable to negotiate codec
If I place a
2008 Jun 12
1
g729 codec for asterisk-1.6.0?
List,
Anybody have success with Digium's G729 codec and asterisk 1.6.0?
Reading http://www.russellbryant.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/05/codec_g729-v34-builds-now-available/
is seems they are build for 1.6 and trunk. But all I could find / use
is 1.4 builds from
http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/
Thoughts?
PB
2003 Dec 18
6
G729 question
I am thinking about using the G729 codecs on my endpoint devices and
purchasing some G729 licenses for Asterisk but I have several questions:
1. Which G729 codec is sold by Digium for Asterisk, G729, G729A, B...I?
2. If I have G729A on one end and G729B on the other, are they compatible?
I have looked all over the place for question 2, but without buying the
ITU docs
I cannot seem to find this
2006 Mar 22
2
G729 License questions
I hope this isn't considered cross posting, i sent the following
email to Digium support but figured someone on the list may also have
better insight into my questions.
I have purchased 2 g729 licenses from Digium for testing and have the
following questions;
** My configuration is a single asterisk box configured with 2 g729
licenses and 2 x Cisco 7960 Phones, I have confirmed the
2009 Dec 01
6
Question about g729
Hello.
I am currently testing an asterisk server using the default codecs, I have allow=all, and noticed everytime I test it in a wireless lan the latency rockets off the roof to over 1000ms. I would like to test g729 since it uses less bandwidth but, read somewhere I have to buy a license per every channel I have. Does this means if I have my server connected with 10 sip clients I need to buy a
2009 Mar 09
1
1.6.0.5 - g729 'locked' by Asterisk
Hey guys,
I'm having a really huge problem, it seems like Asterisk is locking my
licenses of g729 after being used.
For example, 10 people make calls using this codec. Then I can see the
channels and the codecs being used, cool. But then when they hang up
the call the codes are still there, as being used...
I don't know if its a bug or a miss configuration, but the fact is
that I've
2006 Jan 27
3
G729 Commercial Licenses.
Hi all,
I have purchased 2 licenses of G729 from digium and has done the
registration. It works well and is quite fine with my Asterisk@Home. Just
want to clarify some licensing issues regarding them.
If i had to do a full reformat of my PC and reload a@h again will i be able
to use the licenses again without re-registration?
If no. .Is there are limits for this?
Please anyone clarify.
Thanks
2004 May 20
6
G729 codec for asterisk
Hi there,
Here at my company we are willing to use the asterisk IVR system.
The problem we are having rigth now is that all our GWs use G729.
I've read that in order to asterisk be able to make transcoding from the GSM
audio files to G.729, it is necesary to purchase a license from digium. Is
this correct?
I've seen that licenses are purchased on a per-channel basis. Could
2008 Apr 17
2
G729 license count...
I need a refresher course on how many licenses I need to buy. I have
an Asterisk server that receives calls by SIP (G729) and then sends them
to the PSTN via 32 Zap interfaces on an Astribank. I cannot remember if
the license is per channel or per call so I do not know if I need 32 or
64 licenses for this application. Could anyone please remind me?
--
Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico
2006 Feb 03
2
g729 license question
I am wondering how the g729 licenses are done during calls. If I have N
licenses for g729, and N are in use and an additional call comes in that
requests N+1 to be in use, how does asterisk handle that call?
Does it dump it? Does it negotiate another codec automagically?
Basically what happens to that call, obviously it wont (shouldnt) let
you use more licenses than you have available, but
2003 Oct 30
4
H.323 and G729: Another sad tale
I've done some reviewing of the archives for G729 and H323
experiences. The landscape of that query isn't pretty - lots of
pleas for help, and nor do I see too many "answers." I have a
pending bid that requires some data before I can implement * on this
particular solution.
My question is perhaps a slightly differently worded one than has
been asked before, but it may be