similar to: Speeding up wine emulation- benchmarking?

Hi All, I've just rebuild the latest R with the Goto BLAS on our new Intel quad core machines. I did a few basic matrix calculations, and I was very impressed by the performance I saw. I wonder if anyone has a more rigorous benchmarking program for R. I downloaded a old R test/benchmarking program (see below), and this didn't work with the current R, and so I wondered if anyone could

Hey all, I was planning on getting a new computer for the new year to help with my dissertation research, and recently had an opportunity to compare the performance of my 1.6 GHz Pentium M laptop, and a 2.8 GHz dual-core Pentium processor (both running WinXP professional 32-bit). I run a lot of long simulations, so I was hoping to get something that would speed them up. I ran a few quick

Dear R Users, I hope that there is someone who has an experience with a problem that I describe below and will help me. I must buy new desktop computer and I'm wondering which processor to choose if my only aim is to speed up R. I would like to reduce a simulation time - sometimes it takes days. I consider buying one of them (I'm working under Win XP 32 bit): 1. Intel Core2 Duo E6700

Dear list, I have noticed surprisingly big performance differences of runif() between Windows XP and (Debian) linux on similar CPUs (Pentium D 3.0GHz (WinXP)/3.2GHz (Linux)) and I wonder if there is a simple explanation for the difference. On a linux system (with a slightly better CPU and 1GB more RAM), execution of runif() seems to consume about 80% more CPU time than on a Windows XP

We are currently running R under Windows 2000 on a server box running with 2 1.2 GHZ Intel Pentium III Processors. We would like to run this on a new computer running Linux and receive a significant speed increase over our current implementation. Could anyone provide some suggestions for a fast 64 BIT Intel based processor computer with a recommendation for memory and speed/type/number of

I have a 3.2 GHz P4 Win XP Pro connected to a Fedora Core 4 server running on a 2 GHz Celeron. I get about 350 MB/s FTP transfer over a Gigabit Ethernet connection. Samba is very much slower between the same computers. Can Samba be sped up to where it approaches the FTP performance? -- Chuck Forsberg caf@omen.com www.omen.com 503-614-0430 Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded

Greetings, We recently obtained a new computer in our lab with a Pentium 4 3.86 GHz processor and 4 gb of ram running windows xp with service pack 2. After installing R on this machine, I ran a bit of code and found that the execution time was actually significantly slower than a machine running windows xp with an older Pentium chip 1.73 GHz and 1 gb of ram. After speaking with the

I've been updating the information on tuned BLAS for R-admin in R-patched and R-devel. We have ATLAS (widely available, including for Windows) MKL (licensed on ix86 and x86_64 Linux and Windows) ACML (by AMD, but for all ix86 and x86_64 chips, Linux and Windows. Now available for gfortran.) Goto (academic use only, only some chips, only Linux) MKL and ACML provide full LAPACK,

CC:ing syslinux. Thanks for testing David. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:23:51PM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > Trying isohdpfd.bin: ... > Boot it in D865GBFLK Pentium 4 3.4E GHz -- I see a screenful of information, > with "Key?" at the bottom (see attached picture IMG_1578-r.JPG). > > > When I press a key, I see the following message at the bottom and the >

My message is first in english (hope you'll understand it), et en fran?ais pour ceux qui le causent. --- ENGLISH --- Hi everybody, I've got a matter with my Samba server supplied by Debien 2.2r0. testparm returns there's no problem in smb.conf. It's in 'security = DOMAIN' mode. I've got 3 boxes : SERVEUR$, POSTE1$ and POSTE2$, and 6 users, all correctly added to

While it is amazing that Sourcesafe runs under Wine, its performance leaves a lot to be desired. I am using Sourcesafe with Wine (my setup is documented at http://www.kegel.com/linux/vss-howto.html ). The Wine I'm using is from CVS as of last week. My workstation is a dual Pentium Xeon 1400MHz from Dell running 2.4.10. (That's a Pentium 4 Xeon using RDRAM, so it's probably about

Dear Friends, I installed CENTOS 5.0 with XEN (kernel) on Pentium III Celeron 1.2 Ghz, and I would like install WINXP for virtualization. But I don't work, I configurated virtual machine but don't start, Are There how to about it ? Thanks Adriano

My completely empty model (no validation callbacks etc etc) takes an average of 0.05 seconds to create, at least according to Benchmark.realtime{200.times{Message.create(:from => "me@here.com", :message_type => ''email'', :subject => "hello", :body => "goodbye", :sent_at => Time.now)}}/200 That''s a little slower than

Hi, I tested a little bit Samba with Windows vista and found serious performance issue regarding reading large files from Samba server. Computers that I tested Samba with were all identical computers equipped with 2,8 GHz Pentium D processors, 1 GB memory and 1 Gbit/s LAN. All computers have only external USB hard drives so that it is easier to change from operating system to another. First I

Introduce the basic VMI sub-arch configuration dependencies. VMI kernels only are designed to run on modern hardware platforms. As such, they require a working APIC, and do not support some legacy functionality, including APM BIOS, ISA and MCA bus systems, PCI BIOS interfaces, or PnP BIOS (by implication of dropping ISA support). They also require a P6 series CPU. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden

Introduce the basic VMI sub-arch configuration dependencies. VMI kernels only are designed to run on modern hardware platforms. As such, they require a working APIC, and do not support some legacy functionality, including APM BIOS, ISA and MCA bus systems, PCI BIOS interfaces, or PnP BIOS (by implication of dropping ISA support). They also require a P6 series CPU. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden

Hi- I'm almost embarrassed to ask the following simple question, following John's excellent and rigorous bandwidth analysis (see earlier thread): I have a straightforward Asterisk application, IVR-only (no connections between channels). It will simply decode DTMF's and speak prompts (probably A-Law encoded) on a number of E1 circuits simultaneously. Realistically, how many

I have been using rsync to back up my desktop computer (Mac Mini, OSX 10.9.2, 2.5 GHz i5, 4 GB RAM) to a NAS (Dell Dimension running freenas 0.7.2 Sabanda revision 5266, Pentium D 2.66 GHz, 1 GB RAM). The Mac is connected to my router (Cisco E3200) via 5 GHz wireless G and the NAS is plugged in directly (the NAS has a 100 Mbps card). Until about three months ago, backups worked as expected. The

Accessing the parallel port through wine is extremly inefficient: I have heard of people with 2 Ghz CPUs were the speed of the parallel port was still a lot slower than on windows. I have tried on an old Pentium 233 MMX and an AMD K6-2+ 500. Parallel port access is slow, CPU usage is at 100%. Parallel port access speed scales with CPU speed. I'm using the parallel port for an EPROM burner.

Hi everybody, I need help to install driver for video card. I have physically installed two video capture card on two different computers. Both running Linux CentOS release 4.4 (final), and kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp. The first computer is Pentium D 3.00 GHz, 1Gbyte RAM. The second computer is AMD Athlon 2800+, 1 Gbyte RAM. I succesfully installed opencv-0.9.7 on both computers with gtk+ 2.x,