similar to: No subject

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "No subject"

2015 Jan 20
0
sip show channelstats reliable?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Scott Griepentrog <sgriepentrog at digium.com > wrote: > I would recommend capturing traffic outside your Asterisk server with > Wireshark, then running the Telephony/Rtp/Analysize Streams option to > determine if you have packet loss at that point in the network. > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Todd R. <tjrlist at live.com> wrote:
2015 Jan 19
0
sip show channelstats reliable?
Additional info: At the moment I am running 1.8.x but the other day I was getting the same results on 11.x Here is a sample from show channelstats. I do think this command is showing that there is trouble between specific IP's and my Asterisk box but I don't know if the numbers are accurate and reliable. Peer Call ID Duration Recv: Pack Lost ( %)
2015 Jan 21
0
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 126, Issue 18 mtr
You could use MTR command. Its a trace route improved. Marlon Araujo > On Jan 20, 2015, at 08:59, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > or,
2005 Sep 04
1
DTX mode using preprocessor?
> Hi, > > It could (and should) definitely be done, but it's somewhere > (unfortunately not on top) on my TODO list. I think the simplest way > (until I really integrate the preprocessor with the codec, which will > take a while) to do it is to add a speex_encoder_ctl() call as you > proposed. I'd call it SPEEX_SET_EXT_VAD_STATUS and I'm willing to merge > a
2004 Nov 17
1
Jitter buffer
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>In particular, (I'm not really sure, because I don't thorougly >>understand it yet) I don't think your jitterbuffer handles: >> >>DTX: discontinuous transmission. >> >> > >That is dealt with by the codec, at least for Speex. When it stops >receiving packets, it already knows whether it's in DTX/CNG mode.
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2005 Dec 27
0
Re: Fixed-point VAD?
> I found this message concerning VAD and was wondering whether VAD has > been ported to fixed-point in the latest version? Sorry, VAD is still float, but if you're using the built-in one, float emulation should work (it's not very compute-intensive). Jean-Marc > Thanks, > SingHui > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jean-Marc Valin
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2015 Jan 30
2
JITTERBUFFER function
WTF is a jitterbuffer? Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> Date: 01/29/2015 10:41 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] JITTERBUFFER function On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:56 AM,
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2005 Dec 26
2
Fixed-point VAD?
Hi, I found this message concerning VAD and was wondering whether VAD has been ported to fixed-point in the latest version? Thanks, SingHui ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> Date: Jul 22, 2005 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Fixed-point To: gue baja <gue_baja@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Hi Baja, Here's a quick
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2011 Apr 12
0
No subject
to a fax (modulation and demodulation) over VoIP. Try again, the fact that you succeeded twice was pure luck, and as far as I understand that didn't even work out. Switch back to TDM. Your dial up modems want that magic thing called timing and no jitter that only TDM will give you. On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Aaron Krohn <akrohn at ewebforce.net> wrote: > We have an Ascend Max
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2004 Nov 16
1
jitter buffer
jitter varioues from application to application and network to network. let me give you an instance from my own work. i am using speex in a voip application that has to work on gprs connection. the gprs gives just 9.6 kpbs up. hence, i have an upper limit of 6kpbs on the codec and not more than 5 udp packets per sec. that means, putting in 10 speex frames in every rtp packet. i need to jitter
2013 Jun 28
0
No subject
/*! \brief Wait up to 16 seconds for first digit (FXO logic) */ static int = firstdigittimeout =3D 16000; /*! \brief How long to wait for following digits (FXO logic) */ static int = gendigittimeout =3D 8000; /*! \brief How long to wait for an extra digit, if there is an ambiguous ma= tch */ static int matchdigittimeout =3D 3000; -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at
2017 Sep 05
0
Suggest exposing VAD info. from opus frame
Hi. I would like to contribute to the project regarding exposing VAD information from opus frame. I think VAD flag is very useful in jitter buffer management. And it can be used at end-point detection for voice recognition, too. As you know, there isn't VAD flag in CELT mode. So, in my proposal all frames are assumed active signal in CELT mode. It works on only single packet. In multiple
2011 May 17
0
3. Re: ITSP Multi IPs (Alex Balashov) Asterisk-users Digest, Vol 82, Issue 33
Alex, Thank you so much for your response. I've been so consumed with other business that I only just now getting back to this issue. We have implemented your suggestion which is perfect. Thank you again. I've never asked a question of the community before and I'm extremely happy with the rapid response I received. Somewhat related to this initial problem I have an additional