similar to: Bitwise AND

Hello all, I'm trying to prevent answering a channel when a queue is either full or has no members. It seems I'm forced to answer a call before I call Queue() or else the audio is in the early media (which is unacceptable because of the short duration of early media on ISDN). Is there any way to let Queue() automatically answer a channel if the call is going to be placed in the

I have two version 1.6 Asterisks running. One is a small hobbyist thing just at home, and the other is handling calls for several customers. On both, I have added the line exten => h,1,Set(CDR(hangupcause)=${HANGUPCAUSE}) to all relevant contexts. On my little hobbyist box this works perfectly; all calls have their hangupcauses recorded with cdr_adaptive_odbc and cdr_custom. On the

Thanks Dovid! Indeed looks a bug but regardless of this, this problem made me think that the HANGUPCAUSE could be used for this purpose with benefits. I couldn't find an explanation about when DIALSTATUS would actually be better. The HANGUPCAUSE was reworked in version 11 ( https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Hangup+Cause) but I didn't find someone actually stating it is a better

This was always possible in the past, however does not work in the current release. I believe this is a bug. To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com From: cervajs at fpf.slu.cz Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:04:47 +0200 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Storing HANGUPCAUSE in CDR search in archives save the records to another table like cdr_extended Dne

Hello list, Hope all doing well! I've been checking some cases when a Dial fails and dialplan execution continues to handle this. I am finding it a little confusing how we should handle the DIALSTATUS and the HANGUPCAUSE in this situation.... More specifically, I am facing a case in version 13.6.0 where I am getting a DIALSTATUS=BUSY and HANGUPCAUSE=19 after receiving a 480 SIP error. Seems

I think HANGUPCAUSE is channel agnostic. See: core show function HANGUPCAUSE Some thing like this IIRC: Set(my_cause=${HANGUPCAUSE(${CHANNEL(name)},tech)}) Remember the incoming leg of the call and the outgoing leg of the call are different channels. Make sure you are giving HANGUPCAUSE the correct channel. On 06/09/2018 02:01 PM, Khalil Khamlichi wrote: > It seems very weird to me

Hi, I have the following code that operates when a channel is hung-up: [record-hangupcause]exten => 1,n,Set(CDR(hangupcause)=${HANGUPCAUSE})exten => s,n,Return() Before the dial a hangup handler is registered: Set(CHANNEL(hangup_handler_push)=record-hangupcause,s,1) The routine is called and the variables are being set, however not on the channel's CDR which made the call. I believe this

Hello, On an Asterisk 1.4.33.1 in a simple scenario: [test] exten => _X.,1,Dial(SIP/12345 at peer01,,,) exten => i,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten => t,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) exten => h,1,Hangup(${HANGUPCAUSE}) I have noticed that no matter what value we set in the Hangup(<cause code>) commands, if the call is not answered by peer01 for any reason, the actual cause code

Sorry, it seems I have only replied to Lakhdar, not to the newsgroup. Below is my reply to Lakhdar, and I would like to make it more clear now, using some pseudo values for simplicity: I read bytes 1 to 124 from my encoded spx file. I decode themt and get the values: ---Frame 1---- -293 -8234 2134 17 ---Frame 2---- -9323 -732 189 2329 Both frames are just perfect as I need them. But now when I

Hi, I want to compute the bitwise 'and' between two values of type int1:  %x = and %a, %b  . Which is the LLVM instruction that creates this? I only found the APInt class, whose constructor is:  APInt(unsigned numBits, uint64_t val, bool isSigned = false) and which provides the bitwise AND operation: APInt  llvm::APIntOps::And (const APInt &LHS, const APInt &RHS)   Bitwise

Hello, Arnd, As you asked, here's a pull request. This has been in linux-next apparently with no ill effects. The following changes since commit 99975cc6ada0d5f2675e83abecae05aba5f437d2: vhost/net: length miscalculation (2015-01-07 12:22:00 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/uaccess_for_upstream for you to

Hello, Arnd, As you asked, here's a pull request. This has been in linux-next apparently with no ill effects. The following changes since commit 99975cc6ada0d5f2675e83abecae05aba5f437d2: vhost/net: length miscalculation (2015-01-07 12:22:00 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/uaccess_for_upstream for you to

I found out something: The more frames I decode before the frame that I actually want to decode, the better the quality becomes. For example when I basically want to decode frame #100, I read frame #80 to #100, and then frame 100 has the quality that I need. Why? Is there any information on this behaviour? Thank you. Hermann Am 23.12.2011 18:37, schrieb Hermann Weber: > It would be nice

Hi Language Lawyers! In PR23827 ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23827 ), a bitwise op on booleans is considered equivalent to a logical op: if ((x < 3) & (y > 10)) effectively becomes: if ((x < 3) && (y > 10)) where x and y are of type 'int'. The second statement (&&) requires short-circuit evaluation to bypass the y comparison when the x

Hi, I'm using Asterisk and a TE110P E1 PRI in Chile. When I call to a disconnected number or any not operational number, the telco sends the Hangupcause disconnection code and an audio message notifying the disconnection cause to the user. Asterisk does not allow the user to hear the audio message form the telco, instead it cuts the call. Any other legacies PRI PBX I've tested allow

Hello, I have a vector (numeric) v-> c(a,b,c,d,e) and I want to create the vector n->c(b-a,c-b,d-c,e-d). How can I do that? Thank you Hermann [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

My file is 3 hours long, so decoding takes around 5 minutes on an average computer. That is a bit too long unfortunately... Am 23.12.2011 20:38, schrieb Steve Checkoway: > On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:54, Hermann Weber<hermie.weber at gmx.de> wrote: > >> And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? >> Or is that not predictable? > No idea. My guess is not

Just throwing this out here, hopefully someone can tell me why. *CLI> show version Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/17/04-10:16:38 built by root@wanderer on a i686 running Linux Zap/g1 is pri_cpe to Bell Canada 5551234 is a normal POTS line I have busied out (handset offhook) exten => 1234,1,Dial(Zap/g1/5551234,,g) exten => 1234,n,NoOp(HANGUPCAUSE is ${HANGUPCAUSE} and DIALSTATUS is

Hello, I wish to count how often zero (0) appears in the vector test. test [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I think of something like ... > sapply (test, function (x) if (x==0 ... ... but actually I dont know how to carry on. Could anybody give me a hint? Thanks Hermann [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? Or is that not predictable? Greetings, Hermann Am 23.12.2011 19:17, schrieb Steve Checkoway: > > On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:03 , Hermann Weber wrote: > >> I found out something: >> >> The more frames I decode before the frame that I actually want to >> decode, the better the quality becomes. >> For