similar to: Asterisk Database

Hi Is there any way to stop Asterisk from sending Caller ID display on the softphones ? I;ve E1 PRIs and SIP extensions , i need to stop caller ID from appearing on the softphones ...but in CDRs caller Ids should show - so please dont suggest to set "blockcallerid=yes" in zapata.conf ;) Thanks Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi below are my configs: pstn(e1)--->asterisk (span1)----->legacy pbx(connected via span2)-----> legacy pbx analog extensions. my dial plan is like callers dial into asterisk(span1) , hear an IVR option and they are connected to the agents via the legacy pbx (which is in sync with asterisk on span2)....This works perfectly fine until about 200 calls or so...After that time when asterisk

Hi Setup : Asterisk 1.6 on Fedora Core 9 with TE410P.. 1. I;ve noticed that whenever during "background(menu-filename)" method - i try to press any key for selection like 1 for some prompt, 2 for another prompt etc...Asterisk takes a while before it takes me to the respective option..Is that normal behaviour ? by the time the caller waits to listen to the appropriate prompt on selecting

Hi I am trying to implement monitoring of asterisk (all 4 spans-i want to show them line by line Up or down) using nagios using below script, but i always get the status as down and red..can anyone let me know how to read an output from nagios plugin ? nagios etc is configured already and is working PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin FAILS="" SPANS=$(asterisk -rnx "pri show

Hi List I've a CID lookup hooked onto an inbound route (i m using trixbox) ...it runs well but it returns the value as "CIDNAME<CIDNUMBER>" ... if i just want to display the CIDNAME [leaving the quotes and <CIDNUMBER>] .. how can i do it ? do i have to edit some macro in extensions.conf ? rgds Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi I;ve trixbox installed with 2 NICs. One NIC carries the MPLS-VPN traffic (only a 1 MB link without internet for carrying voice to another site) while the other NIC has a connection with public IP for internet services on that machine. the first NIC (eth0) has IP of 172.16.0.1 and is connected to router with WAN IP: 10.18.6.254 , the second IP is 203.234.82.98 (eth1). i want to have the

Hello Everybody I am using Trixbox 2.4 (with TE420P & PRI lines) .. my setup is like Calls -->Asterisk-->legacy pbx--->analog extensions(agents). Whenver a call comes in , asterisk dials the ACD number of the legacy pbx which in turn decides to route to appropriate agent.. for ex : s,1,Dial(ZAP/g4/5432) [g4 is the 4th span and 5432 is the ACD number of legacy pbx under which agents

Hello, This patch aims to improve compile time performance by increasing the SCEV vector size in LoopStrengthReduce. It is observed that the BaseRegs vector size is 4 in most cases, and elements are frequently copied when it is initialized as SmallVector<const SCEV *, 2> BaseRegs. Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by ~0.5%. Patch by Wan Xiaofei.

Hi Daniel, I made some changes to the LNT perf reporting tool to make it more user friendly by adding some features: 1. Make the sidebar and the navigation bar stationary, so that it is easy to navigate the site 2. Have the pop-down menu for the items in the navigation bar, activate upon hovering the mouse, rather than clicking the item 3. Add a nav-link in the sidebar for the

Hi, I am trying to get a small loop to *not vectorize* for cases where it doesn't make sense. For instance, this loop: void foo(int a[4][8], int n) { int b[4][8]; for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++) { for(int j = 0; j < n; j++) { a[i][j] = b[i][j]; } } } * Has maximum of 8ints copy. LLVM tries to use Memcpy for the inner loop. It is not helpful to perform

Hello there, I recently started working on the LLVM backend for a target that doesn't support x87 instructions. Currently, I am in the process of completely disabling some x87 instructions such as fcomi, fcompi,... for a specific sub-target. I also do not have SSE enabled for my sub-target, and llvm resorts to fcomi* instructions for FP compare instructions. Is there a way to bypass the

Hi Nadav, Thanks for the response. I forgot to mention that there is an upper limit of 16 for the Trip Count check, TinyTripCountVectorThreshold = 16; if (TC > 0u && TC < TinyTripCountVectorThreshold). So right now, any loop with Trip Count as 0, or with value >=16, LV with unroll. With the change to the lower bound, it will also include the loop with 0 trip count. SCEV returns 0

Wow, that sounds great! Thanks for working on this, and yes, please, send the patches! --renato On 30 April 2013 16:23, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel,**** > > I made some changes to the LNT perf reporting tool to make it more user > friendly by adding some features:**** > > **1. **Make the sidebar and the navigation bar stationary,

Hi Sriram, Thanks for performing this analysis. The problem here, both for memcpy and the vectorizer, is that we can’t predict the size of “n”, even though the only use of ’n’ is for the loop bound for the alloca [4 x [8 x i32]]. If you change the unroll condition to TC >= 0 then you will disable loop unrolling for all loops because getSmallConstantTripCount returns an unsigned number. You

I am trying to mount the ocfs partitions using the following command Mount -t ocfs -o uid=oracle,gid=dba /dev/sda /ocfs01 as user oracle and group dba. However it mounts the volume as root. But if I use the ocfstool for the first and mount it as oracle:dba, the subsequent mounts using the above command line mounts the volume as oracle:dba. Is there something that I am missing or I will have

On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > so you could infer that n must be smaller than 8 (because you know the range of the other dimension). The question is how often does such an example occur, where this is possible, to make such an effort justifiable? smaller equal, of course ;)

Hi I am using Trixbox 2.4 and PRI lines..on the CDR i see many calls that have duration of 0 seconds, but they are still shown as ANSWERED . how come its possible when duration is 0.00 ? Are the callers billed for such calls ? Rgds Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by > ~0.5%. That's fairly small; what was the standard deviation, confidence interval, etc? -- Sean Silva

Hey Arnold, I have run into this situation many times while benchmarking. I think it is best if this is addressed using a simple heuristic. For that, we need to identify the loop cost and decide if it makes sense to completely unroll the loop, or partially unroll. I am unsure of the optimal way to implement this though. I want to run it by the list to get any ideas floating around :) Thanks

Hi Sriram, I'm not sure if I understand your question correctly: Do you need to generate code that contains no x87 floating-point instructions altogether, but uses calls into a soft-float library instead? That behaviour can be enabled using the "-soft-float" flag, as far as I know. Or is it only about the fcomi* instructions, which are not supported by pre-Pentium Pro chips? Then I