similar to: Updates

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1707 Summary: Tweak OpenSSL ENGINE support to use openssl config system Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo:

the speexdec is incorrectly decoding a file Encoded with: Java Speex Command Line Encoder v0.9.7 ($Revision: 1.2 $) I have to look at the java source code file to find out the details (sampling, mono, etc) --------------------------------- Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on all webmail accounts. Find out more. -------------- next part

I discovered that the Kendall's tau calculation in R uses all pairwise comparisons which is O(n^2) and takes a long time for large vectors. I implemented a O(n*log(n)) algorithm based on merge-sort. Is this of interest to be included in core R? The code (fortran and R wrapper) is available in my package clinfun v0.9.7 (not exported in NAMESPACE). Thanks, Venkat -- Venkatraman E. Seshan,

I found the details: 44100hz, 16bits, stereo I am looking at rewriting the program to record at 8Khz/16Khz/32Khz mono only should I record at 44100hz (and convert down) or record at the required hz level? ----- Original Message ----- From: <speex-dev-request@xiph.org> To: <speex-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 3:44 AM Subject: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 37, Issue 19 >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1483 Bug ID: 1483 Summary: v0.9.7 does not compile for arm-linux-gnueabihf Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: arm OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

Hi. I have to use a comercial Windows software in my work, called Cosilab. Last two months I was using Debian and wine 0.9.1 and everything went perfect. The Program works fine under wine and I haven't got any problems. Now I've updated my computer to an AMD64 with 2Ghz Processor and I do not know if the problem with wine is caused by the 64 bits processor or why... I try to run the

Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ... root at sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-* -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.ko -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 10808 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko

I have a zpool that consists for a two-drive mirror. The two times I took the zpool offline, I had to resilver one of the drives (the same drive both times) when I imported it back. All drives in the pool show no read, write, or checksum errors and are new, so I'm looking to a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB

I got roughly the same performance results when I use the openssl speed test with and without a hifn 7956 cryto card Here's what I did: After the card is plugged in, kldload hifn; kldload cryptodev; I got the message: hifn0 mem 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff, 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff, 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff irg 28 at device 3.0 on pci1 hifn0: Hifn 7956, rev 0, 32KB dram, pll=0x800<pci clk, 4x

Please forgive me for the really dumb question following. I am a complete newbie to rsync. I have been trying to set up an rsync server and am unable to get any logging. I need to know if the following is possible. I'm rsyncing from the client and connecting with ssh to an rsync server. I can connect just fine and the files go with no problem. I'm going from a RedHat 7.3 with rsync

Hello list, please spend a minute considering these facts and maybe there is something to improve: 1) VIA Eden based board can write AES256 encrypted information on HDD at > 60MB/s 2) iperf shows NIC speed 69MB/s 3) openssl tests have even better results 4) openssh can transfer AES256 encrypted information at < 27MB/s (and worse with HDD encryption) It is better with openssh 5.x, than

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC on X86 could consider looking into adding support for the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? If anyone is up for it there are details within these two bug reports.. http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8556 http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

Hello, I can't join a winxp box to my samba domain. I just have one samba server, meant to act as a PDC for domain='CHI'. Any ideas how to troubleshoot and/or remedy? Thanks, Jon Context: ------------ samba v3.3.8 on CentOS v5.5, using ldapsam backend. Domainname ='CHI'. smbldap-tools v0.9.6. I 'populated' the ldap with 'smbldap-populate'. I try to join

Hi. I'm also migrating to BeeGFS and CephFS (depending on usage). What I liked most about Gluster was that files were easily recoverable from bricks even in case of disaster and that it said it supported RDMA. But I soon found that RDMA was being phased out, and I always find entries that are not healing after a couple months of (not really heavy) use, directories that can't be

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I would like to standardize on a very simple protocol by which a guest >> OS can obtain an RNG seed early in boot. >> >> The main design requirements are: >> >> - The interface should be

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I would like to standardize on a very simple protocol by which a guest >> OS can obtain an RNG seed early in boot. >> >> The main design requirements are: >> >> - The interface should be

Hi, I am running Samba 2.2.1 on a Redhat 7.2 machine and have the following in smb.conf: workgroup = AGS_NT security = domain password server = mocha bigblue encrypt passwords = yes everything else is default. "mocha" is the PDC and is a NT4 box". The machine has joined the domain with "smbpasswd -j AGS_NT". When using "smbpasswd