Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "asterisk-users Digest, Vol 54, Issue 107"
2009 Jan 29
2
RTP/NAT Traffic to private IP
Hi all,
I'd like to connect a softphone at home (nat, dynamic-ip) to a sip-phone
in the office via asterisk 1.4.21 (nat, fixed-ip). SIP works well, the
phone is ringing, but when I pickup the call, there's no audio on both
sides.
I debugged the rtp-traffic at home. As long as the phone is ringing,
everything is fine. But after the pickup, asterisk sends a SIP/SDP
package with its
2009 Aug 03
3
SIP AND NAT
I recently did a set up where I replaced a simple D-link home router
that was having trouble processing a T1's worth of bandwidth with a
linux machine running iptables. the kernel was 2.6.29-r5 and I chose
the SIP connection tracking modules from the menuconfig.
Router worked fine for normal traffic, but I was unable to get the SIP
phones to work. Using ngrep it was plain to see
2008 May 23
5
Shorewall is eating my Asterisk egress traffic
I have four-interface Shorewall config set up. The "dmz" interface is
bridged with "net" so I can assign public IP''s to the servers in the DMZ. I
opted to do this rather than SNAT or ARP proxying because one of the servers
runs Asterisk and SIP and NAT don''t always work well together. Somehow, my
firewall config is causing a one-way audio problem in
2007 Oct 30
18
How do I configure shorewall to work with VoIP SIP?
Hello,
Let me first start by saying Shorewall is awesome, and I use it
everywhere from single box firewall, to home network firewall, even to
our corporate firewall.
I am experiencing a problem getting my home firewall to work with my
BroadVoice VoIP connection. I use the Sipura SPA-2100 ATA (Analog
Telephone Adapter) that came with my BroadVoice account. This happened
when I tried to replace
2009 Aug 26
1
netfilter conntrack mangling canreinvite?
Hello, all. Since implementing an iptables firewall between the
Asterisk PBX and several SIP phones, the Asterisk PBX ability to
"reinvite" has been broken even when the phones are on the same network
(i.e., no firewall between the phones). We've been beating our heads
against the wall thinking it was the complex rule set but it appears the
issue is ip_conntrack_sip.
Before I drop
2006 Aug 25
9
[Bug 503] ip_conntrack_sip , ip_nat_sip DNAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=503
siqhamo@newlunar.co.za changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are
2009 Jan 30
2
SIP.Conf - bindaddr per peer?
hI,
Trying to understand how to setup two PRIs in sip.conf. Using Asterisk
1.4.23.
I have a provider giving me two PRI (different rate centers) through SIP.
Both PRI comes in from the same IP on the provider side, but go to two
different IPs (both on the same box) on my side.
How can I setup two different SIP peer, one for each of the PRIs I get, if
all I can use to differenciate them
2007 Jan 26
4
[Bug 532] ip_nat_sip rewrote Call-ID instead of Contact - patch attached
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=532
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-26 19:45 MET -------
(In reply to comment #0)
>
2010 Jan 27
1
arp_ignore for lo-device
I have a working LVS-Setup on CentOS 5.4 with the following settings
in sysctl.conf:
net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_ignore = 1
net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_announce = 2
net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore = 1
net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_announce = 2
Now I''d like to use shorewall, but after activating it, shorewall
changes both arp_ignore values to 0. I just found out how to set
arp_ignore for separate interfaces, but
2007 Jan 18
0
[Bug 532] New: ip_nat_sip rewrote Call-ID instead of Contact - patch attached
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=532
Summary: ip_nat_sip rewrote Call-ID instead of Contact - patch
attached
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: All
URL: http://ibp.de/
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
2006 Apr 17
24
Sip Traffic
Hi.
there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic,
in order to put in a highest prio class ?
Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but
next both server and client seems jump to a
random(?) port.
I can''t use CONNMARK because is udp traffic.
I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to
SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4
kernel series .
When you patch 2.4 kernel with
2009 Feb 01
5
Sending Calls via SIP trunk from two different IP addresses from same Asterisk Machine
Hi All;
I can assign for my Asterisk Machine a two IP addresses (xxx.xxx.xxx.yyy and xxx.xxx.xxx.yyz), how can I use these two IP's so I can let one call sent with a source IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.yyy and another call to be sent with another source IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.yyz, I need this because I need the side to authorize my calls by the IP address, and some calls to be authorized with the
2006 Apr 25
3
56K Dialup and VOIP over same PRIs
Anybody have suggestions on having a 56K dialpool and VOIP
connections with an Asterisk box over the same set of PRIs? We've
done the PM3 with PRIs for just dialup, but are looking for a way to
integrate our Asterisk box and move our voice calls onto the same PRIs.
Ian
--
Ian White
Victoria Free-Net Association
email: iwhite@victoria.tc.ca
http://victoria.tc.ca/
2002 Nov 26
4
printer list from cups without restart?
Hi,
while using cups as a print system and sharing all the printers with
samba to windows clients, is it possible to 'view' a newly created
printer in the browse list without restarting smbd ? (samba 2.2.7)
Holger
2008 Nov 28
0
Calls drop after a couple of minutes.
I have been encountering a rather hard to debug problem for the last
couple of months:
* Calls are setup fine.
* After a couple of minutes, two way audio becomes one-way and the
remote or local party drops out of the call.
Setup:
* Nokia E71i sip on NAT'd network (multihomed linux box)
* Remote asterisk 1.4.21 on Ubuntu on public network
* using a Finera/Betamax provider to route calls to
2004 Nov 30
2
Really Get 96 Simul Calls?
Hey guys,
I'm looking for some realworld specs on somebodys machine that will work
with the Digium 4-port T1/PRI card and that will support 96 simultaneous
calls.
Dell is soon to release the PowerEdge 1850: 2U, Dual 3.6Ghz Xenon, 1Gb DDR2
RAM, Dual 36GB Ultra320 SCSI RAID, Hot swap Powersupply, one 64bit 133Mhz
PCI and one 64bit 100Mhz PCI for about $3,000.
Tack on a 4 port Digium card and
2006 Aug 16
7
ActionWebService: XMLRPC Server Multicall possible?
Hi all,
I have a question concerning ActionWebService XMLRPC servers: Is it
possible to send multicall requests to the Web service? I tried to
use multicall and get the error message:
no such method ''system.multicall'' on API [MyAPI]
In Changeset 2021 there is the following commit message:
add ''system.multicall'' support to XML-RPC. boxcarred methods must
2009 Jul 09
1
PRI failover to SIP trunk
Hello,
I've found a little documentation on voip-info and on the asterisk-
users list, although I was hoping for an example of a tried-and-true
failover setup between PRI and SIP.
We are an outgoing call center that uses asterisk 1.4 connected to 2
PRIs from the local telephone company in one group (g1) and a SIP
trunk from bandwidth.com. The PRIs are the primary outgoing service,
2019 Aug 19
6
Segfault with error 4 in doveadm-server
I set up dovecot on two servers with replication enabled. The replication is over a vpn connection.
I get massive segfaults from doveadm-server every few minutes.
dmesg:
doveadm-server[30030]: segfault at 0 ip 0000557fa16d2e62 sp 00007ffdcaafec50 error 4 in doveadm-server[557fa16a3000+41000]
[486397.225636] Code: 40 03 4c 8d 3c c3 48 8d 44 24 18 48 89 44 24 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 49 8b bc 24
2012 Nov 13
5
Sending calls from behind NAT
Dears;
It seems my service provider is requesting a complicated settings to allow me to send from behind NAT.
What they said:
"It shouldn't matter as long as you are handling the NAT correctly your end. We do not fix NAT so if you're sending internal addresses in your INVITEs or SDP then things will fail but if you're handling it correctly, we shouldn't tell the