Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "should_eql etc?"
2006 Dec 30
2
Another RSpec on Rails issue: how to test send_file()
Hi!
Today I needed to implement some controller code, that uses send_file()
to send image data. How can this be tested / specified with RSpec?
bye,
Tobias
2006 Dec 31
2
what''s with the response.should_be_xxxx stacktrace?
If I do
get :index
response.should_be_success
I get about 20k of marshalled dumpage that starts like
#<ActionController::TestResponse:0x390443c @body=\"<html><body>You
are being <a href=\"http://test.host/carts/1\">redirected</a>.</body></html>\",
@assigns=[], @redirected_to={:action=>\"show\", :id=>1},
2007 May 26
11
RSpec
Hi RSpec Mailing list,
I''m new to RSpec and I am trying to get it running with the caboo.se sample
rails app.
I installed the current version of rspec with rspec_on_rails
I tried to run rake spec but received:
330-07:~/desktop/restful_auth_rspec/vendor multimedia$ rake spec
(in /Users/multimedia/Desktop/restful_auth_rspec)
2006 Nov 08
1
controller.session not same as session?
> context "A user logging out" do
> fixtures :users
> controller_name :account
>
> setup do
> login_as :quentin
> users(:quentin).remember_me
> request.cookies["auth_token"] = cookie_for(:quentin)
> end
>
> def logout
> get :logout
> end
>
> specify "should unset :user in session" do
2006 Dec 13
3
Testing has_many :through
I''m working with a has_many :through association, where a Member
has_many Projects through ProjectViewers. The problem I''m running
into is that Rails doesn''t load the association so line (3) fails
until I explicitly access a member of the collection (in this case, I
iterated it). Is there a better way?
Thanks,
Steve
1. assigns[:member].should_not_be_nil
2.
2006 Aug 31
2
RSpec style in Scriptaculous'' unittest.js
Doing Javascript?
Looks like Scriptaculous'' *excellent* unittest.js has got some BDD love:
http://ajaxian.com/archives/scriptaculous-behaviour-driven-development-testing
Aslak
2007 Feb 15
4
defining context(s) dynamically
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Q. Why does code which defines a context work in the
2007 Feb 01
3
should_redirect_to in rspec-0.8.0 / rspec_on_rails 1453
I have a spec:
specify "a post with no user id should add a record" do
post :edit_or_create, :user => {:login => ''joeschmoe'', :email =>
''joe at shmoe.com'', :email_confirmation => ''joe at shmoe.com'', :full_name
=> ''Joe Schmoe''}
assigns[:user].should_not_be_nil
2007 Jan 05
4
How To Spec Controllers with Finders
Given this code (which renders rjs), I''m faced with the fixture-
driven way of spec-ing or mocking. How the heck to you mock this so
the code at line (2) and (4) work right? I''m still struggling with
mocks but it seems like this can be done. Forgive the naivety of this
question.
1. def change_quantity
2. @line_item = LineItem.find_by_id(params[:id])
3. unless
2007 Apr 04
11
ANN: RSpec 0.9.0 beta-1 available for download.
We''d like to get some feedback on RSpec 0.9 before we start pushing
out releases via Rubyforge''s gem server and update the website. We
have therefore made the first beta of 0.9 available - both prepackaged
and tagged in subversion (see below).
RSpec 0.9 introduces a new API for expectations, which essentially
means that your underscores go away (there has been other discussions
2006 Nov 19
6
artificial sugar causes cancer
All,
If you look at http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6760&group_id=797&atid=3149
you''ll see that Chad (the submitter) found the source of the bug.
Unfortunately, the source of *this* bug is the *solution* to a
*previous bug* in which Rails was replacing RSpec''s method missing
with its own.
When we settled on underscores, my one reservation was
2007 Jan 21
35
Collection proxies need to be stubbed ?
Hi all !
I just started writing specs on a new project. I would just like to
validate that this is the way you would write it. I know about mocks,
stubs and expectations. I don''t think this is a problem for me.
My question really boils down to:
def index
@projects = current_user.projects.active
end
My spec needs to return the proxy, no ? Here''s my code:
context "A
2011 Jul 14
1
RoutingError with RSpec Controller test on Scoped Route
So I have a route that looks like this:
scope "4" do
scope "public" do
scope ":apikey" do
resources :shops
end
end
end
And a bunch of controller specs, an example of which looks like this:
describe ShopsController do
describe "when responding to a GET" do
context "#new" do
it "should create a new instance
2007 Feb 13
16
Error against latest trunk while testing via spec for model
Hi
I just did an update to lates trunk
=================
context "Given a generated venue_spec.rb with fixtures loaded" do
fixtures :venues
specify "fixtures should load two Venues" do
Venue.should have(2).records
end
end
==================
gives me
==========
1)
TypeError in ''Given a generated venue_spec.rb with fixtures loaded
fixtures should load two
2008 May 10
4
Newbie: lambda do...end.should change(Model, :count).by(1). Doesn''t work
Hi to everyone,
I''m an RSpec, and BDD in general, newbie so in order to learn I have
chosen to use my personal website as a tesbed.
I''m having difficulties juggling with mocks, and in particula with the
following code.
Here''s the controller action:
def create
@album = Album.new(params[:album])
if @album.save
flash[:notice] = "album saved"
2007 Feb 16
6
some fun functionality for all your specs
I''ve found these two snippets of code useful and would love some feedback.
first, .should_have_valid_associations
usage:
context "A new Product" do
specify "should have valid associations" do
@product.should_have_valid_associations
end
end
code: (thanks to Wilson/Defiler for converting to rspec)
module Spec
module Expectations
module Should
2007 Mar 24
15
State Based vs. Behaviour Based Spec/Testing
I''ve notice that a project like Rubinius has both a spec & a test
directory. Rspec has only a spec directory. Obviously I support
BDD, but isn''t there also a place for state based/verification
testing? I sometimes sense that I *do* want to practice Test Driven
Development. That is, I want some assurance that my production code
will run as intended. But I also
2006 Oct 17
0
new handling of equality
All,
Based mostly on the earlier thread on "should_be", we have introduced
a new branch called should_be_working_like_ruby with the new proposed
handling for equality.
Per the CHANGES file in that branch (rev 896):
============================================
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS RELEASE IS NOT 100% BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE TO 0.6.x
This release changes the way RSpec handles equality.
2006 Dec 04
5
should_be_different -- possible implementation
There is an assert_difference helper for Test::Unit (you can read
about it at http://blog.caboo.se/articles/2006/06/13/a-better-
assert_difference and to some it should look familiar -- you know who
you are :), so I took a shot at one for rSpec on Rails.
class Object
def should_be_different(method = nil, difference = nil)
return self.should_not_eql(yield) if method.nil?
2007 Apr 26
0
Shouldn't this spec fail?
Shouldn''t the second spec fail? I''m trying to provide a default value in the
model (I''m well aware this is normally the job of the controller, but it
seems right to be the model in this case). Also, after_initialize doesn''t
seem to be the right way of doing this, but before_create or any of the
other things don''t make the first test pass.
specify