Courtenay
2006-Dec-31 01:24 UTC
[rspec-users] what''s with the response.should_be_xxxx stacktrace?
If I do
get :index
response.should_be_success
I get about 20k of marshalled dumpage that starts like
#<ActionController::TestResponse:0x390443c
@body=\"<html><body>You
are being <a
href=\"http://test.host/carts/1\">redirected</a>.</body></html>\",
@assigns=[], @redirected_to={:action=>\"show\", :id=>1},
@template=#<#<Class:0x38d5fc4>:0x38d5f9c @assigns={\"template_ro
and finishes 20 pages later with
@headers={"Status"=>"302 Found",
"cookie"=>[],
"Content-Type"=>"text/html; charset=utf-8",
"Cache-Control"=>"no-cache",
"location"=>"http://test.host/carts/1"},
@session=#<ActionController::TestSession:0x390466c
@attributes={"flash"=>{}, :cart=>{}}>> should be success
nil
My question is, is this intended, or just a side-effect of using
should_be_xxxx? In which case, particularly regarding the "artificial
sugar causes cancer", the response should_be really could be more
nicely formatted ("response should be success but was
''redirect'' to
''http://''")
Finally, while I''m assuming that I''m doing it properly, is
there a
better way to do the response code checking?
Thanks,
Courtenay
http://blog.caboo.se
David Chelimsky
2006-Dec-31 03:55 UTC
[rspec-users] what''s with the response.should_be_xxxx stacktrace?
On 12/30/06, Courtenay <court3nay at gmail.com> wrote:> If I do > > get :index > response.should_be_success > > I get about 20k of marshalled dumpage that starts like > > #<ActionController::TestResponse:0x390443c @body=\"<html><body>You > are being <a href=\"http://test.host/carts/1\">redirected</a>.</body></html>\", > @assigns=[], @redirected_to={:action=>\"show\", :id=>1}, > @template=#<#<Class:0x38d5fc4>:0x38d5f9c @assigns={\"template_ro > > and finishes 20 pages later with > > @headers={"Status"=>"302 Found", "cookie"=>[], > "Content-Type"=>"text/html; charset=utf-8", > "Cache-Control"=>"no-cache", "location"=>"http://test.host/carts/1"}, > @session=#<ActionController::TestSession:0x390466c > @attributes={"flash"=>{}, :cart=>{}}>> should be success nil > > My question is, is this intended, or just a side-effect of using > should_be_xxxx? In which case, particularly regarding the "artificial > sugar causes cancer", the response should_be really could be more > nicely formatted ("response should be success but was ''redirect'' to > ''http://''") > > Finally, while I''m assuming that I''m doing it properly, is there a > better way to do the response code checking?You''re doing the right thing re: response code checking. In the future, please consider raising a bug report for things like this. I took the liberty of doing so: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=7506&group_id=797&atid=3149 raised and fixed Happy New Year, David> > Thanks, > > Courtenay > http://blog.caboo.se > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
Courtenay
2006-Dec-31 04:26 UTC
[rspec-users] what''s with the response.should_be_xxxx stacktrace?
On 12/30/06, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:> On 12/30/06, Courtenay <court3nay at gmail.com> wrote: > > If I do > > > > get :index > > response.should_be_success > > > > I get about 20k of marshalled dumpage that starts like > > > > #<ActionController::TestResponse:0x390443c @body=\"<html><body>You > > are being <a href=\"http://test.host/carts/1\">redirected</a>.</body></html>\", > > @assigns=[], @redirected_to={:action=>\"show\", :id=>1}, > > @template=#<#<Class:0x38d5fc4>:0x38d5f9c @assigns={\"template_ro > > > > and finishes 20 pages later with > > > > @headers={"Status"=>"302 Found", "cookie"=>[], > > "Content-Type"=>"text/html; charset=utf-8", > > "Cache-Control"=>"no-cache", "location"=>"http://test.host/carts/1"}, > > @session=#<ActionController::TestSession:0x390466c > > @attributes={"flash"=>{}, :cart=>{}}>> should be success nil > > > > My question is, is this intended, or just a side-effect of using > > should_be_xxxx? In which case, particularly regarding the "artificial > > sugar causes cancer", the response should_be really could be more > > nicely formatted ("response should be success but was ''redirect'' to > > ''http://''") > > > > Finally, while I''m assuming that I''m doing it properly, is there a > > better way to do the response code checking? > > You''re doing the right thing re: response code checking. In the > future, please consider raising a bug report for things like this. I > took the liberty of doing so: > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=7506&group_id=797&atid=3149 >Awesome..! OK, will do in future. I generally assume that I''m doing it wrong if I get a page o'' code.. still fumbling my way around the syntax. Courtenay http://blog.caboo.se