Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "No subject"
2008 Jan 29
8
Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
Hi All,
PLEASE READ if you depend on Asterisk CDR's and support transfers.
Apologies for the shout but I'm desperate to get others to agree Asterisk has a
big problem with the CDR's that are generated for transfers. I can understand
why not too many people are interested as transfers are complicated and
messy. However for those of us having to support transfers and depending on
2008 Nov 22
5
CDR Desgin
I've taken the liberty of starting a new thread to discuss the design
of the Asterisk CDR mechanism. The discussion has been kindly
initiated by murf putting together a proposal:
http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs.
After reading the proposal I still don't think it's the right way to
go. To my mind adding more channel variables increases the complexity
in a situation
2008 Nov 23
14
CDR Design
I've taken the liberty of starting a new thread to discuss the design
of the Asterisk CDR mechanism. The discussion has been kindly
initiated by murf putting together a proposal:
http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs.
After reading the proposal I still don't think it's the right way to
go. To my mind adding more channel variables increases the complexity
in a situation
2009 Jan 06
5
Simple CDRs
Greyman--
I'm taking this discussion to the list.
Folks,
what we are talking about here, is me trying to get a grasp around
Greyman's (Aaron's) request for a bare-bones CDR generation
that describes just total connect time for channels, stripping
out all the details. Who cares about xfer, park, hold, etc.?
So in the following is our discussion about what *should* be
there, and in
2009 Apr 14
4
Ignoring time spent waiting in queue in CDR
Hello,
I'm working on an Asterisk configuration for a call center, and they
bill based on the time spent talking to an agent, but not for any time
spent waiting in a queue. The CDR information contains the entire
duration of the call as billable seconds, including time spent waiting
in the queue. I would like the billable seconds to only include the
time spent actually talking to an agent.
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
straight away I can think of a scenario that would cause a problem. If
I supply toll free numbers that need to be billed for incoming calls
and that can be forwarded out to billable destinations then I want a
CDR for both ends of the bridge.
In your first blind transfer example what if the initial incoming call
to A is billable? I can't see any easy way to get the duration of that
call leg.
2023 May 05
0
Calls running forever / CDRs inaccurate
Hi list!
Running Asterisk 20.0.0 on CentOS 7, logging CDRs using
cdr_adaptive_odbc to mariadb-server-5.5.68 (via
mariadb-connector-odbc-3.1.7-ga-rhel7)
Using chan_sip.
I'm facing the problem when there is a sudden spike of calls, some of
the calls that are being made during those spikes hang forever
basically. This looks like this:
[root at voip]# asterisk -rx 'core show channels
2018 Oct 03
2
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi asterisk-users,
We have recently moved to the 13.x branch of Asterisk from 11.x, and we're trying to correlate CDR records from multiple-legs for billing purposes.
As part of this change we have added 'linkedid' to our CDR table schema in an attempt to join the multiple records into one billable record.
The call path can be simplified as (transport types in brackets):
SIP
2010 Jul 20
1
Preserving CDR(accountcode) in Local channels
Greetings list,
Whilst running through a routine check of some CDRs, I've noticed that the
originating channel's accountcode isn't preserved on creating a local
channel. For example, if we start with:
exten => 123,1,Set(CDR(accountcode)=foo)
exten => 123,n,Queue(bar,nrtw,,,)
And the queue 'bar' is defined as follows:
[bar]
member => Local/456 at outbound
member
2018 Oct 08
3
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi all,
Just thought I'd update this thread in case anyone else is Googling trying to find out how to do this...
I found the solution to my problem to be to use the IAXVAR() function to pass the accountcode between the Asterisk boxen and update the CHANNEL(accountcode) with that variable.
Thanks to Richard @ Digium for the reply that clarified my misunderstanding.
Calum
On Wed, 2018-10-03
2009 Jul 26
0
MeetMe time doesn't show up in CDRs?
Hello,
I'm working on some dialplan rules to pull multiple users into a
conference call. I have some fairly straightforward rules which start
up a new MeetMe conference, allow escape with the * key to invite more
users, then use a features.conf sequence to bring the new user into
the conference with ChannelRedirect.
The problem I'm running into is the time in the MeetMe conference
2009 Jan 12
6
CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users
Hello!
Most are probably bored seeing another letter about this,
but I've put in a fair amount work on a spec for rewriting
the CDR system in Asterisk, and I have some questions:
First, please look at what I've written so far:
svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs
and look at the file "CDRfix2.rfc.txt" in the RFCs dir.
The spec SIGNIFICANTLY alters the way
2013 Aug 01
2
Asterisk 1.4 CDR vs VoIP Innovations CDR
When I compare my total minutes on the bill from VoIP Innovations, to
the number from our CDRs, I'm finding a smalish (3-4%) discrepancy in
the count of minutes. I'm wondering why it's there.
Are there different methods of counting the billable start or end point
of a phone call?
If it matters, I'm counting more termination minutes than they are and
they're counting more
2007 Mar 23
0
minimal asterisk for iax2 bridge
Hello:
I'm building asterisk for a bcm96348GW board, wich has a usb capable device to
timming ztdummy, kernel is 2.6.8.1.
This board will be serve as a prototype for an IAX2 trunk "bridge" in the form
SIP/IAX2<--->IAX2trunk<--Inet-->IAX2trunk<-->LucentCS/SIP<-->SS7/POTS
The parameters are known.. in the sense that only g729.a will be used, the two
2005 Jul 21
1
account code missing in csv cdr
My cdrs are missing accountcodes for incoming calls from other asterisk
servers..
I've seen a few people mentioning this on the list and the solution
seems to be setting up a dialplan for incoming calls from a particular
sip peer.. in my opinion this does not scale well at all and I am
looking for a solution to correct this problem.
example sip peer:
[asterisk_gw]
type=friend
2005 Feb 17
0
Accountcode and SIP Peers
Hi to all,
following the suggestion of Matteo Brancaleoni to solve my problem of
anonymous call in CDRS i implemented the accountcode in any peer that i have
in the sip.conf so i can use the SetCallerID to accountcode to identify the
caller.
When i make the sip show users the accountcode is correctly displayed but when
i try to access the variable ${ACCOUNTCODE} from the extensions.conf to
2005 Feb 28
0
strange CDR problem
I'm using all sip, no zap, or iax, so I don't know if the same problem
exists when using zap, or iax.
When device 1 calls device 2, and device 2 blind transfers to device
3, the following happens:
The cdr record shows that 1 called 3, and ignores completly the fact
that 1 called 2 and 2 called 3. In normal billing I think that the
duration of the entire call should be billed to device 1
2009 May 08
0
Leg-based CDR proposal updated; Major mods
Hello!
It's me again. I began a fairly large modification to my CDR proposal
some weeks ago, and finally yesterday and this morning got enough
accomplished to allow a commit and some peer review.
Check the docs out via " svn co
http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs "
This is a directory; in it you will find:
CDRfix2.rfc.doc
CDRfix2.rfc.docx
CDRfix2.rfc.pdf
The docx
2007 Nov 07
2
Determination of billsec
How is the billsec field calculated in CDRs?
I have a situation where billsec is being reported as 0 despite the call
being answered and a conversation occurring. An example record follows:
'2007-11-06 21:36:50', '6495566778', '6495566778', '0116495566778',
'1100012_1', 'Local/0116495566778 at 1100012_1-887b,2',
2006 Jun 29
1
Very bad quality with AVM Fritz!card PCI andchan_capi
> > That is possible, how could I check that?
> > I can see that IRQ 17 is shared between eth0 and my fritz!card
> but I
> > don't know if it changes anything:
>
> Can you try it (or eth0) in a different slot (or change IRQ's in the
> BIOS if possible) to see if it makes any difference? That's the
> only way
> to know for sure, anything else is