similar to: build failure on Gentoo Linux, recommended fix included.

Hi, First time I try ro resolve a domain user after samba/winbind is started, it takes a couple of seconds during which winbind says the following Received packet for \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC700000A GetDC got invalid response type 21 Received packet for \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC700000A GetDC got invalid response type 21 Received packet for \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC700000A GetDC got invalid response type 21

I am having trouble with one of my samba PDC's. It does not recognize itself as the domain master browser even though it is set to be so. I can not add machines to this domain and I suspect this is why. Has anybody seen this or know what causes it? Notice this: DOMAIN_ALBANY(3) current master browser = ALBANY_PDC DOMAIN_NYC(2) current master browser = NYC_PDC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Boundary failure in GETDC mailslot == processing can result in a buffer overrun == == CVE ID#: CVE-2007-6015 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.0 - 3.0.27a (inclusive) == == Summary: Specifically crafted GETDC mailslot requests == can trigger a

I had a problem similar to my current one a week or so ago, and I was encouraged to upgrade from Samba 2.2.9 to 3.0.7, which I did. Now that I've completed that nightmare, the problem I initially set out to fix is still there, just different. Namely: I am trying to set up Samba 3.0.7 on a SuSE 9.1 box as an LDAP PDC whose only job will be authentication. Our LDAP server is on a separate

I was thinking about running Wine on Interix (the POSIX layer of Microsoft's Services for Unix). There are a few apparent unknows: Would Wine load the .dll.so's? Since Interix uses PE for it's native format (running on Windows, duh), Would Wine load the .dll.so's? Would it reject them being in PE format and having the 'POSIX Layer' attribute set, or could we hack on a

Hi folks, I made some tests with OS/2 (really!) and Samba 4 (tested with 4.1.17) and found some issues: 1. Domain Logon When doing a domain logon with "logon" then we get an error message in the log: [2015/06/02 12:40:07.291956, 2] ../source4/nbt_server/dgram/netlogon.c:187(nbtd_mailslot_netlogon_handler) unknown netlogon op 0 from 10.144.41.131:138 [2015/06/02

Hallo! I found a quite usefull hint about email-notification using samba by simply writing a Mailslot-message-command into the users .forward-file. That is quite nice, but there is a small problem: While the username is still the same, so does not the computername. People can log on every computer in a network, so the computername varies. I am looking for a method to run a script - on the server

Greetings, Here is what I have built samba on: Solaris 9 GCC 3.2.2 samba-3.0.20pre1 openldap-2.2.24 MIT Kerberos 1.4 Samba built with: ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/samba --with-automount --with-profile --with-acl-support --with-utmp --with-winbind --with-ads --with-ldap --with-krb5=/opt/local/kerberos5 --with-pam Within a minute of starting samba + winbind I get a core dump in the samba

Dear James, Thanks for the input. Even increasing from 5 to 10, the amount of times to miss the password and lock the account (after changing, I wheeled a gpupdate / force), if you miss 3 times the account is locked. I changed smb.conf log level to 9. I tried to unlock the account using the samba-tool command line, but without success, because I can only unlock using the RSAT. I get these

Hi everyone. I just got a copy of Win2k in and have been messing with it. Have a question, and have searched the archives for the answer, but didn't find it. Can Win2k domain logon to a pre-3.0.0 samba server? Or di I need to get TNG running? I can get NT4.0 boxes to authenticate and login fine (Samba pre-3.0.0), but Win2k keeps complaining: "The following error occurred validating

Samba: 3.0.28a I'm staring at Wireshark output to try to see why one user can read a particular cookie file from one machine, but the same user cannot read it from a different machine. I see: SMB_NETLOGON SAM LOGON request from client SMB_NETLOGON SAM Response - user unknown The detail of the exchange is below. The user name provided appears to be blank. So this may not be a

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

Hello, I have noted below problems that we can take care of, and those that aren't our problem, never were, never will be, impossible to be our problem, (you get the picture), because they are PEBKAC errors :) For all of those that don't know: PEBKAC = Problem Exists Between Keyboard and Chair. Molle Bestefich wrote: >Hi > >I've tried to sum up the problems with the

Sorry, I guess I did not explain my self... I am running wine 0.9.17 and when I launch the projection utility from the terminal I have no problem, but when I choose a .shp file to process, I get the following promt from the gui: Run-time error 5 invalid procedure call or argument. On the terminal I can read the following promt when launching the prjutil.exe: fixme:ole:CoRegisterMessageFilter

I'm trying to get Samba up and running and having a terrible time. It says that I should be able to run nmap and see that 137 and 139 are open - which they are not. I have not added any restrictions in smb.conf, do not have a firewall running and I have increased the log level to 5 to see all of the messages. It says that it is talking on 137 but it kind of looks like it's not talking

Hi, Just got Fedora FC1 vanilla 2.4.25kernel+libata8patch booting problems, FC1 complains that it can not automatically find&found partitions specified with "LABEL=" in /etc/fstab, and then falls me into repair mode. In the repair mode I can mount it manually without any problems. More interesting are: 1) I have several partitions specified with "LABEL=*" in

I downloaded wine but when I try to invoke it I get this message ... wine: could not load L"c:\\windows\\system\\program.exe": Module not found What does that mean? how can I fix it? and how can I get Wine to start running?

On my campus network, there's one wins server that can see every machine on every subnet. I want to provide access to all these computers to the W98 boxes in my workgroup. So here's what I did: I created my own workgroup, set myself to be the local browse master and domain master. So now everything works properly on my linux box (rh 6.0, samba 2.0.5a) and the W98 boxes in my workgroup

Good afternoon: I need if they can help me I have 2 Servants with Fedora Core 1 Kernel-2.4.22-1.2197.ntpl, with the following packages Openswan: Kernel-modulate-openswan-2.4.22-1.2197.ntpl-2.1.4-fc1.dag.i686.rpm and the Openswan-utils-2.1.4-1.fc1.dag.i686.rpm. As Firewall I have the shorewall 2.1 All this works well when having alone an In-date IP. When having 2 In-date IP, one to leave to

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1528" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY><!-- Converted from text/plain format --> <P><FONT face=Arial