similar to: connect a LAN server to a WAN server as a sip client

Hi List; If I need traffic to be directly between the endpoints, then I have to set the canreinvite = yes? If I did not configure the canrenvite at all, then by default it will pass the traffic via Asterisk and not directly between the endpoints? What if one endpoint was SIP and configured with canreinvite=yes while other endpoint was IAX2 and configured with canreinvite=yes, then they can send

Dear all... I'm a Chinese and I don't think that my English is well . But I have a big problem in use IPTABLES . I've looked all the documents and FAQs , but I can't find a solution to solve my problem . At last I decide to ask you in my poor English ...^^|| I have a Linux server (Turbo Linux7.0 in kernel 2.4.9-3) to be my NAT server . I have make it running iptables-1.2.2-6 . It

You need a combination of iptables and iproute2 to do what you want = because routing is based on it's DESTINATION address and you need to route on = your SOURCE address so it uses a different route depending on which source = IP is in the packet.. Refer to this page which is sort of what you want BUT not exact. It'll = give you some ideas...

I have a fedora system configured and running with virsh using kvm/qemu. All I want is to have a fixed ipaddress for that virtual machine. I know that there is the Host and Guest sides to the network. The host has virbr0 interface, which i guess is a bridge. Seem when ever I define a interface to the guest with a type=routed it hoses my other interfaces on the host and requires a console reboot --

Hi folks! This is sort of OT but I thought maybe someone had a tip for me. What I'm looking for is a tool that I can install on two computer for example, put one on each side of the customers WAN and "try" the connection - simulalate x calls (using codec xxx) and get statistics out of it (delays, jitter, dropped packets and that sort of things). I have looked at ethertap (to debug

Guus: Ok, I accept your challenge. But I am clueless in terms of getting the routing table correct. So each server has a dual identity, both a LAN private identity with a PRIVATE IP address and a WAN public identify with a PUBLIC ip address. And how to have 2 different tun devices show up in the ifconfig -a so that LAN IP address can be assigned to the tun0 and a WAN IP address can be assigned

Hello my Sambese friends, Has anyone got info on tuning the SMB client in OSX for connecting to Samba servers across a WAN/VPN? I get decent performance locally, but when I reach across our VPN link to another site, throughput falls right to garbage when compared with FTP. Thanks in advance for any tips. --Rob Rob LaRose systems administrator imaginary forces | 530 west 25th street | new

Hi everybody... How can I share my WAN ip to my LAN? How can I do that I really dont know...:( I am using linux long time ago but this kind I would like to do newly... Can anybody help me about IP sharing in Centos? thanks alot... -- Tolun ARDAHANLI Bilgisayar Muhendisi E-posta:tolun.ardahanli at linux.org.tr Icq:326600

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:29:16PM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip > addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN > addresses are unique. > > But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the > 10.99.0.11 address. That should not be a problem for tinc. As long as both

Hi, I have a weird issue that I hope someone can help me with. I have 2 test computers and I've changed each the roles of each one with the same results. I have one xlite client running across a VPN and another connecting directly from the WAN via the external IP. The client connecting directly to the external IP can call the client running across the VPN no problem. However, the client

We recently installed Samba 3.x server on Linux system (RHEL 3.0, using stock RH samba packages). We are observing following messages in logs: lib/access.c:check_access(328) and access is denied. I know why we get access denied: we have restricted "hosts allow =" setting. My question is: why are we getting connection requests in first place? I think something is advertising this

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

We are having an issue that I have been unable to figure out how to resolve. I think its related to the Polycom Phones and not the Asterisk configuration, but I'm not positive. We have several Polycom 500/501/601's on both a LAN and at employee homes. The problem we are having is if our internet connection goes down the Local LAN phones loose their connection to the Asterisk Server.

Hi, I''m implementing a linux router with this characteristics: - Multiple adsl with each public ip''s - Multiple LAN ethernets (in a bridge). - Linux IGD I have successfully implemented de 2 first steps, the adsl balanced fine (multipath routing), and the clients bridge fine. My problem is how to use that with linux-igd. My LAN bridge has STP and is implemented for

Hi forum, I have been fighting days and days configuring FWD and asterisk with NO success I have the following scenario. My sister in Spain with FWD dialup client My question is if she can dial my FWD dialup number, which is registered in Asterisk and the call being forwarded to ring my IP Phone. Spain LAN FWD

Hello, I am experiencing what may be a unique problem with operating the bridge. My hardware is custom Freescale MPC875 processor based with one ethernet (eth0) and one hdlc (hdlc0) WAN port and I am connecting two of these boards together using the WAN ports over a long distance - essentially two bridges in series. They are running Linux 2.6.15 with bridging enabled in the kernel

Gus: I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN addresses are unique. But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the 10.99.0.11 address. So that is why I created a VPN for inside the cluster on the LAN interfaces using the private 10.0.1.xx range. THen, I created a separate VPN on the

Hello list, I want a set-up with a satellite link (eth0) and a cellular cdma link (ppp0) coming into a linux box with a LAN (eth1 or wlan0) to be able to route first through the satellite when it''s on, or else the cdma when it''s in range. Load sharing is not critical, but it would be nice. The satellite has a static IP, the cdma is dynamic. Both WANs are

i apologize if this has been asked before, but things are too busy to preclude a full search of the list. i have both cable and dsl from the local providers here. due to wiring issues here, i''ve been forced to put the cable modem in one end of the house and the dsl modem in the other. the cable modem is firewalled off by a cisco pix 501 (192.168.2.12). the dsl modem is firewalled off

Hi all I need to use three 512 kbps aDSL internet connections, in a load-sharing, link-failover scenario. Presently I am using Ipcop with a single DSL. Now, I seem to have two options...one..an Edimax quad wan port adsl router, with firewalling and NAT and second install a minimal linux distro for routing...something on the lines of LARTC....and keep NATTING, IDS & Firewalling on the linux