similar to: Sonicwall potentially causing long ping times to SIP phones

Hi, I've been trying to fix NOTIFY replies (specifically keep-alives) in 1.4.42 (I can't upgrade to 1.8.x at the moment for various reasons). I've noticed for user agents that have a VIA header with a different port than the port the NOTIFY was sent from, the NOTIFY reply will always be sent back to that port, which is incorrect. (Sonicwalls and other routers love to do this, even

Hi all, I currently have an Asterisk test server behind a TZ170 Sonicwall firewall / NAT box, with several DIDs. I've found that inbound IAX2 calls don't work reliably (i.e., I get a busy tone) unless I enable "Use Consistent NAT" in the Sonicwall. This feature is poorly documented by Sonicwall, so I thought I'd pass it along. Has anyone else run into this, or figured

Hello Has anyone else run into a problem with dovecot pop3 and sonicwall? A week after switching to dovecot we had two local customers call and report they could no longer download emails with attachments. It turned out to be the email macro filter on the router. After the first report I thought maybe the customer had just changed something or it was a fluke, but then a day later we had the

Sonicwall now has "SIP transformations" check box in the Access section of the interface - does anyone know how to make sense of this function? Tech support is useless, and the help description is confusing. Using on office network to connect Grandstream and Cisco phones to asterisk PBX at remote location. I hate to use linksys or belkin, but they're (ironically) the only 2 that

Recently the small business I work at replaced an aging linksys wrt style router with a SonicWall one. Ever since this change I have issues with this node falling back to TCP constantly. TCP for me ends up performing very sub-par, and most of the time unworkable. For some reason too the connection usually ends up being routed through another node. I created a new tinc instance using TAP

Current dev cvs install on two systems. System A is behind a SonicWall firewall, and system B is on a registered IP address. (System B has multiple iax links that are fully functional to multiple locations.) System A is correctly registering with System B, with no special firewall rules. Should System B be able to take advantage of the "registration" to send iax/gsm calls to System A

Hi, I remember seeing a T38 Gateway application for Asterisk 1.6 floating around, but I can't seem to find it again. Does anyone have any pointers to it? I really want to be able to send an incoming T38 connection directly to the PSTN. Thanks. -- James

I've searched the archives a bit and have not really come up with a good answer to my queries. I have * running on a RH9 box behind a LinkSys NAT box. I can talk with iConnectHere outbound just fine. I am trying to configure an inbound Xten softphone from outside. I have that user set as NAT in sip.conf (seems to help), but I still cannot establish a full session. I think the problem comes

Hello All: I have a situation where I have a Samba box (RH 7.3 w/samba 2.2.4) that I set up for a client. Another consultant came along and installed a VPN using SonicWalls between the main site and a remote site. So now they want the remote users to save files on my Samba box. No problem except that the remote users can't see my local workgroup or any of the local machines. Here's

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, James Lamanna <jlamanna at gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, how big does the cache in frame.c grow to? > > I've recompiled with MALLOC_DEBUG on that server: > > > > asterisk -rx "memory show summary" > > > > .... > >

Hi, I'm coming up with ideas about building a cluster of asterisk servers, and am exploring the virtualization option. I'm curious to know some real-world data about how many extensions a VMWare install on good hardware could support. I've seen stories about how the hypervisor timeslicing can wreak havoc on call quality at some point. Is this really the case? If so, what's a

> > Its up to 5.8G of resident memory with 28321 calls processed. > The OOM killer is going to kill this soon at this rate (8GB RAM machine). > This seems like a pretty serious problem. > It looks like I'll need to restart asterisk every night.... Hi the number of cpu cores that you see with top times 512Mbyte is the level of ram that's needed e.g. a hp-gen8 with 2 octo

Hi all, Disregard my previous posts, I've consolidated everything here. I'm having terrible performance issues with samba over a WAN (point-to-point T1 link). Doing a copy of a 2MB file from a samba server to a linux client running smbclient takes over 5 minutes. SCPing the same file takes seconds. The server is running samba version 3.0.25c with kernel 2.6.16.18. I've put up a set

Hi, I've noticed that if I have a multi-line linksys (942 or 962) phone with the same sip registration mapped to each line key, that if all the lines are full the phone will accept another call. I would expect the phone to respond with "busy" so the call would to directly to voicemail. Has anyone else experienced this and know of a workaround? I know it seems like an

I am sure someone has had success getting NetBIOS names to transfer from one side of a VPN to the other, but I'm not that person (yet). I have read all available documentation and newsgroups and have exhausted my patience. I have a linux box running 2.4.21 kernel with Freeswan on each end of a VPN (its working). I have "Arno's iptables" firewall installed on each end (It is

Hi. Between 2 linux (2.6.11 client and 2.6.14 server) machines connected by a 100Mb link I get samba performance copying a file from the client to the server through a smbmounted share of around 4.2MB/s Is this to be expected? Or can it be improved (and if so, how?) I've tried tweaking SO_(SND/RCV)BUF (after reading numerous articles on samba performance...), but it doesn't seem to have

Also, how big does the cache in frame.c grow to? I've recompiled with MALLOC_DEBUG on that server: asterisk -rx "memory show summary" .... 1780466242 bytes (1780181594 cache) in 2352909 allocations in file frame.c ... Seems like a ridiculous cache. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:02 AM, James Lamanna <jlamanna at gmail.com> wrote: > cat /proc/cpuinfo lists 4 cores. >

Hi, Does anyone have any good empirical data suggesting what the maximum number of PRI calls (incoming and outgoing) without hardware echo cancellation can be handled on a single box is? I have a TE410P T1 (1st gen) card and I'm seeing interesting errors of D-Channels going down and then coming back up (See below). I've looked at the number of simultaneous calls at each of these points,

Hi, I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18. Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days consistently, phones start dropping registrations. However, when this happens, doing a "sip show peer" on those extensions shows them as "OK". Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until customers start calling. The only way to fix it is

> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:11:19 -0600 > From: "Danny Nicholas" <danny at debsinc.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Registrations broken on 1.4.22.1? > To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <D32AD473FC574B41AE6A842E46549174 at db0005> >