similar to: SIP or SCCP for cisco

I have a new asterisk installation (1.4.2) that is working fine with SIP. Now I'm trying to add 2 cisco ip phones (7960) running SCCP (latest chan_sccp). I have the phones booted, and the tftp directory all setup, etc. But the phones do not quite work right. When I lift the handset I only get a dial-tone 1 out of 5 or so times I try, though hitting the speaker button works. I can dial

Hi All, I'm thinking of creating a new asterisk server using the latest 1.4 stable release to replace my ageing Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r7231 (its been a while!). My only concern - my phones are Cisco 7960's (with sccp firmware 7.2 loaded) and to support them better, I remember compiling in a skinny(?) driver to replace the (from what I could tell) basic in built sccp support. After

I am trying to register cisco 7920 to asterisk using sccp since to sip firmware upgrade to it ,but its ends with failed registration.Can you please send me a sample for sccp.conf configuring cisco 7902. Thanks -- SCCP: Accepted connection from 192.168.5.163 -- SCCP: Using ip 192.168.5.228 -- SCCP: Accepted connection from 192.168.5.163 -- SCCP: Using ip 192.168.5.228

I have some Cisco 7960's and want to use them with SCCP - I have gotten it working with a few different firmware versions but all seem a little flakey. I know that SCCP is not as solid as SIP but am wondering, which firmware version is advised for use with chan_sccp from http://chan-sccp.sourceforge.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm trying to setup a couple of Cisco 7960's in asterisk. I have asterisk working fine for sip clients, and can call the 7960's just fine, but I can't seem to dial out on them. As soon as I enter the first digit, the phone attempts to dial it without waiting for the rest. I've changed timeout settings, etc but can't seem to get it to work. Any ideas? Asterisk

Hi, An Cisco 7960 ipphone has been set to SCCP firmware by one of our students. I want to set it to 7.5 SIP firmware and I've been unsuccessful yet. Firmware versions are SCCP 3.0 (Source: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_ipphon/english/ipp7960/addprot/mgcp/frmwrup.htm#wp1045789) ie: Application Load P003F300 Boot Load ID PC030300 When I browse, phone settings, I see

Does anyone have the 7970 work with sccp? I have used the example configurations from the wiki. I can see that the phone is failing to retrieve the CTLSEP<MAC>.tlv file and then is able to retrieve the SEP<MAC>.cnf.xml file. The phone is hanging with the message "updating ctl". Thanks, John SEP<MAC>.cnf.xml: <device> <devicePool>

Hi All, Does anyone have any experience getting a 7936 to work with Asterisk? Do you need to use SCCP or is there a SIP image for the phone? I have a few 7960G's and they are working with SIP, just curious if the config of the conference phone is the same and if anybody has any good setup links. Thanks! NB -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, ? The current SCCP image on the 7942 phone is :SCCP42.9-0-2SR1S. We are trying to convert/upgrade the phone to SIP version of the firmware i.e : cmterm-7942_7962-sip.9-0-3 (Firmware is downloaded from the cisco support site). We have unzipped and placed all the files in the /tftp (root directory) of tftp server. Following files are also placed in the tftp directory. ? The Upgradation /

On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: >>> For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values >>> calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization into an >>> analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can >>> use its analysis results? >> >> SCCP is already split into an SCCPSolver class

What is involved in getting SIP firmware into a Cisco 7960 with sccp installed? Expensive image from Cisco? Plated in unobtanium? joe a.

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values >> calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization into an >> analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can >> use its analysis results? > > SCCP is already split into an SCCPSolver

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >>>> For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values >>>> calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization >>>> into an >>>> analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can >>>> use its analysis results?

I'm wondering about the difference between Cisco Call Manager and SCCP(2) network traffic. I'm working on getting a Cisco 7960 phone to speak through a NAT to an asterisk box, without having to do a bunch of port forwarding on the NAT device. Without the nat, everything works fine. If the phone is behind a cisco pix that is doing the natting, it works fine (fixup protocol). If the

Hi all, I'm writing my graduation theses : analysis VO-IP protocols , and I cannot find any documents about Cisko Skinny Client Control Protocol. I have Cisco CallManager and some IP-phone and I'm sniffing traffic between that, but I don't understand, how this protocol works. Clearly i'm looking for description of SCCP commands and explanation some basic SCCP scenarios or what

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> Then just run the SCCP pass, and check to see if any operands satisfy >> the predicate "isa<UndefValue>(V)". LLVM explicitly represents >> undefined values. > > I have a case where it doesn't, but perhaps the SCCP pass isn't to blame: > > extern void write_char(int); > > const char foo[4] =

On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> You could do that, but SCCPSolver isn't really useful to mainline LLVM >> for anything other than SCCP and IPSCCP, so we don't need it in a public >> header. Out of curiosity, what are you looking to use the latice values >> for? Why not just run SCCP and then look at the transformed code? > > I was planning to

On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values > calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization into an > analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can > use its analysis results? SCCP is already split into an SCCPSolver class that is used by the SCCP and IPSCCP classes. You

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >>> You could do that, but SCCPSolver isn't really useful to mainline LLVM >>> for anything other than SCCP and IPSCCP, so we don't need it in a public >>> header. Out of curiosity, what are you looking to use the latice values >>> for? Why not just run SCCP and then look at the

This compiler does not have mem-SSA, as far as I know, only few pass can propagate value along memory. You need to promote those local variable into register first before sccp is invoked. e.g1. opt a.ll -basicaa -gvn -sccp -S eg.2. opt a.ll -sroa -sccp -S On 4/16/13 12:37 PM, Niko Zarzani wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to see how single llvm optimizations work by running them