similar to: Help! - Double NAT issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Help! - Double NAT issue"

2005 May 31
2
Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working
Hi, I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just fine, but I can't hear
2006 Jun 12
2
How can I use my regular phones with Asterisk running on my Linksys WRT54G router?
Ok, I've done some more research and I don't think I want an FXO box... What I'd like to do is use BroadVoice (with their BYOD plan) and then run Asterisk on my WRT54G router. I'd also like to use my regular home phones without having to use a special "SIP" phone... (eg. I like my Vtech normal cordless phones) What do I need to buy to get this working? It sounds like I
2007 Oct 30
18
How do I configure shorewall to work with VoIP SIP?
Hello, Let me first start by saying Shorewall is awesome, and I use it everywhere from single box firewall, to home network firewall, even to our corporate firewall. I am experiencing a problem getting my home firewall to work with my BroadVoice VoIP connection. I use the Sipura SPA-2100 ATA (Analog Telephone Adapter) that came with my BroadVoice account. This happened when I tried to replace
2007 Jul 05
1
SIP / STUN / Network - Help!!
Hi Everyone. I'm in a quandry & don't know which way to go. - Obviously I'm an Asterisk newbie although I've been watching this list for over 2 years now. I've got an Asterisk box (actually, it's an AsteriskNOW box) up and running here at home. - It's on my home LAN - NAT'ed behind my LinkSys router. - On the same LAN I've got a Cisco 7940, 7960, and
2008 Feb 01
4
"Real" API for Perl?
Hi, all. I've used the perl/AGI interface, and... well, I found it kind of hokey. Granted, this was in 1.2 days -- perhaps things have changed. Regardless, I guess I have two questions: 1) Has the Perl/AGI "binding" improved since then? 2) Is there any chance of a "real" API for Perl? Thanks much! -Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
2004 Dec 11
1
looking for input on broadband router with QoS and VPN support
Hi, We're installing an * box next week (pbxtra from fonality) and I'm trying to come up with a solution for remote users that want a phone in their home. I need VPN and QoS capability, wireless support would be a nice to have. Ethernet handoff is fine, i don't need integrated dsl or cable modem... I've been googling and cruising the list and can find bits and pieces
2007 Jul 24
1
Testers needed for VoIP router solution
Hi all, We have put together a firmware for a range of inexpensive routers. It has been configured to provide optimum VoIP performance. We have internally tested it for number of months and it looks very good. You should be able to run it easily with 20+ phones on local network ( we still did not hit the upper limit ) assuming that you have bandwidth. Your VoIP will get prioritized over other
2005 Jun 06
1
Double NAT issues with SIP and workaround (?)
Hello, I've been fighting one-way-audio issues with asterisk and SIP extensions for some time..., and I want to share with you my findings ;) My setup: * 1 ADSL router (Zyxel) * 1 Asterisk box with private IP, and interesting ports forwarded to it. * Several extensions, some local some remote The problem: * External extensions behind double nat don't get audio when they
2005 Jul 05
2
Remote SIP Connections
Hello all, I have my * server setup behind a Linksys WRT54G on Adelphia cable. I have forwarded 5060,10000-10020, and another port set can't remember off the top of my head but I can't seem to connect to the * server from any locations that are direct connects to the Internet. Am I missing a portset for forwarding? If I use the name service (voip.*****.com) from my home connection on the
2007 Nov 22
1
NAT keep-alive
Hi, On my linksys/sipura phones/ATA, there is a setting called "NAT Mapping Enable" and another called "NAT Keep Alive Enable" These settings must be on in my setup so that my phones/ATA remain connected to my * server. My setup is: Home LAN - Pfsense (NAT, Dynamic Public IP)- Internet - PFsense (1-to-1 NAT, Static public IP) - Asterisk server. I was wondering:
2005 May 24
3
Budgetone and NAT not working
I have a couple of Budgetones that I am playing with trying to get them to work with * from a remote network over the Internet (yes NAT joy!). My * server is in my DMZ and I have 5060 and my RTP range forwarded (UDP) to my public address (through a Cisco PIX). Internally, I can setup my budgetone, it registers and works great. I then have a Linksys router connected to another Internet
2004 May 23
1
Serious NAT problems: can't call between lines on sipura
I have a problem that is almost certainly nat-related, but I can't figure out what's happening. Since moving the Sipura behind a NAT server (Linksys), I am no longer able to call between the two lines on the same Sipura. When I dial one extension from the other, it rings, but immediately after I pick up the ringing phone, the call is uncerimoniously dumped. I can tell the call
2006 May 01
2
SPA-1001 behind NAT -- mucho hair pulling
I've got a Sipura SPA-1001 that I'm trying to get working with an Asterisk server that's on the public Internet, while the SPA-1001 is behind NAT. I did the first obvious thing and mapped ports 5060 and 10000 - 30000 to the local IP address of the SPA-1001. Tried numerous proxy settings, have all the NAT settings == yes. Registration seems to be happening; with sip debug on, I see
2005 Jun 13
3
problem with pf and asterisk
current setup SIP phone 192.168.1.30 --> linksys wrt54g sveasoft -- INTERNET -- (xl0) Firewall (xl2:172.16.0.50)--> (em1:172.16.0.101) Asterisk problem is RTP stream not oging trouhg from * to sip and vice versa. #1 and asterusk is pushing 192.168.1.30 back to linksys with 172 as return address.... or #2 asterisk trying to get back to me as 192.168 on public internet.. got
2005 Aug 04
2
TFTP - Good or Bad?
Hi Guys/Gals - I don't post here often but I read with interest all the postings. - I've been on a lot of mailing lists, but this one is by far the most interesting. I've been doing a lot of work with 'tftp' loading Cisco 79xx phones with firmware, configs. for asterisk, etc. And I see where a lot of folks have trouble with 'tftp', use alternate port numbers
2006 Nov 07
3
connect Sipura with Asterisk - both behind NAT
Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather (especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link explaining how to setup Linux server -- #Joseph
2004 Nov 23
2
Asterisk on a Linksys WRT54G(S)
Hello to everybody, does anybody knows how to install Asterisk on a Linksys WRT54G(S)? I had read in the Wiki that it is possible. If somebody has a tip, this would help me very much. Regards Bastian
2006 May 17
5
Audio problems 50% of the time.
I have an Asterisk server that I use at work. I have a phone that is at home that logs into the Asterisk server at work. My home phone is hooked up via DSL through a Linksys router. You can see the my sip.conf for the phone blow. The problem is each time the phone rings I can hear/be heard 50% of the time. Any suggestion on what to look for. I do have my reg time set for 180 seconds on the
2004 May 22
1
Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY re quests)
Sipura does include STUN as an option. It has for quite some time. We are using it with all of our Sipuras behind NAT'd gateways and it works great! Try upgrading to the latest Sipura firmware rev. Darren Nay > -----Original Message----- > From: John Todd [mailto:jtodd@loligo.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:57 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject:
2004 May 22
1
Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY requests)
At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >>[snip] >Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk >can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points >out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything. > >The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable. > >Another problem with the SIPURA is