similar to: HDLC errors

Hello, I am wanting to close a specific channel for example; SofthangUp(SIP/EXTEN-UNIQUEID) but the problem is the channel is assigned a unique id as well. The need fits into the idea of receiving a call from a higher status user and thus closing a specific channel to allow the higher priority call to route through the dial plan to the freed extension. Any ideas welcome. Many thanks

Dear All, we have installed a TE410P card on a Dell Poweredge 1750 running a slackware 10 with 2.4.26 Kernel. Then we have made two loops on the card and we have configurated all the 120 channels. Our goals was to perform some stess tests even if in this scenario we used the same box as generator and target. The stress test comprised to generate up to 60 calls at the same time by placing a file

please can anyone help me knowing if i can install Linux and Asterisk on HP servers _________________________________________________________________ Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista? + Windows Live?. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi all, I have setup a Dell PowerEdge 2550 with a Sangoma A200 card with 2xFSO and 1XFS modules. The PowerEdge specs are 1 x P3 1133MHz, 512MB RAM. Sangoma A200 has 3 analogue PSTN lines connected. This server is based in Office 1, with 5 users all with a Linksys SPA942 VoIP Handset. There is another Office (Office 2) connected to here using VPN. There are two users in Office 2 with the

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jan Prunk <janprunk at gmail.com> Date: Sep 13, 2007 3:35 PM Subject: Bad FCS error To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Hello ! I am getting the following error in asterisk logs: Sep 11 17:33:30 NOTICE[2187] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Sep 11 21:45:08 NOTICE[2187] chan_zap.c: PRI got event:

hello everyone, I have a trixbox server with an E1 card(not digium).It connects to an AVAYA pbx use E1. It works fine.But when i change the E1 card to digium TE220B,there is a problem. When sip extension A(on trixbox) call PSTN extension B(on avaya),A must wait longtime before B start to ring.From the log I find there are two times call. I don't know why the first request be rejected

Hi all, i am trying to setup my first t1 in asterisk, i have been using asterisk for several years but ahve never needed a t1 line before. I have a sangoma card already in the server with 4fxo ports. Now i ordered two single port t1 line cards from sangoma for the two servers i am connecting with the point 2 point t1. I am currently at the location trying to set things up but have some

Hello folks, I wanted to setup Oreka to monitor calls on a trixbox box I have setup. Oreka doesn't seem to be catching all of the calls though.... I have port mirroring setup on the port that trixbox is connected to, mirrored to the port Oreka is connected to. I have read that Asterisk doesn't work as a SIP Proxy, so I wondered if this meant that some phones, after checking in with

Is anyone successfully running asterisk on an HP proliant while using their management software, hpasm? I have two DL360's and two TE220B's. The cards have their own IRQ's. No matter what combination of settings I use, the cards fail the patlooptest if hpasm (ver 7.9.1) is running. If I stop it the cards pass the test. I really want to run the management software, so I'd

i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers on wmware, on boot i have the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" [OK] ----------------------------- and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the following message: ----------------------------- Applying

Hi all, anyone could pls explain me what does it means ? It a part of zaptel.conf file. LBO= Line Build Out 0: 0 dB (CSU) / 0 - 133 feet (DSX-1) 1: 133 - 266 feet (DSX-1) 2: 266 - 299 feet (DSX-1) 3: 399 - 533 feet (DSX-1) 4: 533 - 655 feet (DSX-1) 5: -7.5 dB (CSU) 6: -15 dB (CSU) 7: -22.5 dB (CSU) Thanks Giordano -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG

Hi Related to this message: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-February/090205.html After having a lot of trouble with abort and breakdown of the PRI connection I finally figured out what was wrong: The kernel was compiled for generic ide chipsets which doesn't support DMA. When our daily backup created some load for the disks the interrupts for the digium card

I just upgraded my asterisk install from january 2005 CVS HEAD to current CVS HEAD : * zaptel * libpri * asterisk My asterisk have one TE405P with one span (the clock source) pluged into a telco PRI E1, a second span is a PRI E1 to another PBX and the third one is a T1 to a rhino channel bank. Everything went smoothly except that the two PRI span restart every ten seconds after some HDLC

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

I have a pair of sites tied together with a T1 line running zaptel PPP on either end. The system works, but I keep getting these messages in the kernel logs, and users are reporting connection problems (TCP timeouts, and hangs) especially under high usage. --snip-- HDLC Receiver overrun on channel WCT1/0/1 (master=WCT1/0/1) HDLC Receiver overrun on channel WCT1/0/1 (master=WCT1/0/1) HDLC

Hello, I contacted Krzysztof Halasa, the maintainer of the current sethdlc code. This is the response he gave me. Of course, I have this working now. Still some minor configuration to do, but It does work, and the connections to the internet are _much_ faster than when I went through the adtran... I would highly recommend to anyone with a fractionated T1, with data and voice channels to

Hi, After upgrading to DAHDI 2.4.0 from Zaptel, I noticed a lot of HDLC errors on my console: [Nov 27 01:15:09] NOTICE[2743] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 [Nov 27 01:15:09] NOTICE[2743] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 These errors prevented calls from being made and received on my PRI spans. This seems

I've read as much as I can on this error and still can't seem to figure out what's causing this error: Jun 23 20:54:58 NOTICE[7483]: chan_zap.c:7395 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 23 20:55:03 NOTICE[7483]: chan_zap.c:7395 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 23 20:55:03 NOTICE[7483]:

I have 2 servers, configured identically. Each has a TE405P and 2 PRIs. One server was experiencing crackly audio on one circuit, accompanied by HDLC bad FCS messages. The telco recabled and moved me to another port on the DMS-100. The audio is better, but there are still bad FCS problems on the span. I have moved the PRI in question to the other server, and the problem does indeed move with the

I'm attempting to bridge ethernet over hdlc between two * boxes. If anyone has any information they can offer concerning this, it would be greatly appreciated. Here's the configuration the companies IT guy wants to bridge. I have it working already without a bridge, but he wants the head box's ethernet to be on the same subnet as the ethernet across the span. Pardon my horrible