similar to: Two B-Channel Transfer (2BCT/TBCT) Trobule on DMS100 PRI

Hi Guys, I am sorry if my issue is not related to this but I think it is. I have a PRI with Bell Canada and when I dial in and have the call transfered to a context to dial out and then have those two channels bridged, the call disconnects with cause 16 just exactly as Jay R. Ashworth shows in his CLI output. Bell Canada support RLT or know as 2BCT or TBCT to some but we have not requested that

Greetings, This may be a bit arcane but does anyone know what the contents of a facility message should be for initiating a TBCT on an NI2 ISDN. I've been trying to get it to work on a DMS100 for the last four months to no avail. The message I am currently sending makes it to the switch but is returned with unknown message. Perhaps someone here has done it before and can help me out.

Hello, We currently have a scenario where a large percentage of inbound calls on a telco PRI are intended for professors who aren't currently in their offices/at their desks. My question is, is anyone actively using the Asterisk "RLT" (Release Link Trunking) feature to bounce these sorts of calls back to the telco? The idea being to forward the call to their mobile phone without

I''ve been trying to figure out the best method for generating GUI''s with Ruby. I ended up using DialogBlock because it seems like the fastest way. But not I have to work backwards and have not done this before. How do I go from the file I generate in DialogBlock to a code in Ruby? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I have problem since we changed our IP address of the server from 192.168.1.16 to 192.168.11 and now Samba's internal KDC doesn't authenticate any users and it won't let me change DNS records as a result of that. Is there any way of "manually" changing IP address in some file somewhere? Or is there any other way of getting around this? Regards, Luka

Hello, A client has asked for Two B channel Transfer capability (known as TBCT or 2BCT, similar to other features such as ECT, RTL and Q,SIG Path Replacement) in a new Asterisk system and so I researched the capability and came up with quite a few gaps in documentation.

Hi Guys, I'm starting to work on Asterisk, trying to see if it will fit our needs, but so far it seems it doesn't support TBCT(Two B Channel Transfer). I've found a couple of links that was talking about TBCT, and someone had posted a bounty for that feature, but no news since 2003. I've also seen that it seems there is some support in libpri, or work was done around 2005 for

Hi- A customer of mine running asterisk has inquired if asterisk currently supports TBCT, that is the ability of asterisk to transfer a call back up to the carrier's switch to complete a connection, freeing up the B-channels on the asterisk box. I saw a reference to this feature in the asterisk "bounties" section on the Wiki, and someone added a note saying that this might be

We have a DMS100 that does not have PRI. So we're using a channelized T1 using WU-LAW, ESF and B8ZS coming from the DMS100 that's plugged into a Tormenta2 Quad T1 Card on my Asterisk Box running Debian 3.01(woody) with Kernel 2.4.22. The Link is up but according to the DMS100, Channel_1 goes into RMB (Remote Manual Block) and Channel_2 goes into LO (Lock Out). I've been through all

Hi Folks, I'm trying to send CallerID Name information out to the PSTN via a PRI with Bell Canada with no success. With inbound calls (originating from the PSTN) CNAM is received successfully, and we've not had any similar problems with other Telco PRIs, so I'm stumped.

----- Original Message ----- > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 07:57:15 -0400 (EDT) > From: David Troy <dave@popvox.com> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller Name sent from Asterisk over > National or DMS100 PRI to a Norstar MICS? > snip> > > I have a PRI link up and running between Asterisk and a Nortel Norstar MICS > > v4.1 . I'm having a

All good information, thanks. However this is private network between Asterisk and a Norstar MICS about six feet away. So I'm holding both ends of the link. :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: David Troy [mailto:dave@popvox.com] > Sent: September 16, 2004 4:57 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller Name

I'm trying to get "blind transfer" from an incoming DAHDI line to an external number to work on an * 1.6 install using a T1 from XO. The documentation is very "distributed" and incomplete, so while it's not working, it's definitely more likely my error somehow. Couple questions if anybody is out there who even knows what TBCT is. 1) Is this even

I have a PRI link up and running between Asterisk and a Nortel Norstar MICS v4.1 . I'm having a problem getting the textual Caller Name across the link from Ast to Ns, however numeric Caller ID arrives and displays fine. From Ns to Ast both elements come through fine. I'm forcing dummy values for testing using: exten => s,1,SetCIDName(Test) exten => s,2,SetCallerID(1234561234)

Hello all, I have Asterisk 1.2.1 and a TE110P connected to a Nortel Meridian Option 81C system. The PRI line is currently setup as DMS100. Here are the relevant lines from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf: zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24 loadzone = us defaultzone = us zapata.conf: [channels] language=en context=from-internal musiconhold=default switchtype=dms100

Told you it was too complex of an issue :-) I figured to do this in zapata.conf and all is fine now: transfer=no That was the magic two letter which was sending a request for RLT feature on the line. Set transfer to "no" and all worries gone. Thanks for the input everyone. -Bruce On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM, bruce bruce <bruceb444 at gmail.com> wrote: > Futher check

In the next week or so, we'll be turning up a new T1 Pri from Cox Cable in Omaha using a T100P (installed but not yet configured). While discussing the interface parameters with a very knowledgable Cox engineer, we decided on some of the basics including b8zs, esf, dchan=24, callerid, 5 digits of called number forwarded to *, and switchtype=national (NI2). They indicated their CO switch is a

Hello All, I was wondering. What are the primary advantages to using a PRI over a T1? As I understand it, the PRI terminates very fast, meaning you can do immediate answer and dial... This is very handy on the BRI line I have on the asterisk. Can T1 signalling also do immediate answer, or does it just behave like a channelized pots line and ring as usual? I am trying to determine if I should

Hello all, I got a problem at an asterisk server, with dropping calls, losing all channels and reaktivating all channels and beeing back up. This problem seems to occure randomly over the whole day, when it gots traffic on the card. After looking @ google I found several hints but none did work fine. To avoid problems with the phone line (german E1) I called the provider, he did a 45 min. route

I'm having trouble setting up the function call to handle two lists of matrices. Each list has 6 matrices - Each matrix is 20x10. I need to do some basic math on corresponding matrices in each list. Here are some outputs of these lists, etc... # first list > length(qc.pm) [1] 6 > dim(qc.pm[[1]]) [1] 20 10 > qc.pm[[1]][1:4,1:4] 441-JP071707.CEL 442-JP071707.CEL