similar to: NAT traversal packet loss measurement

Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec 1.0.8? Am I likely to run into problems? Would it be best advised to wait or can I go ahead now? Thanks, Yitzhak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071212/c6fcea0f/attachment.html

For the life of me can't figure out why the Asterisk server generates an enormous quantity of outgoing packets on port 8004/udp. They seem to have no effect whether they are blocked by the firewall or not. We're running SIP. Everything appears to be OK (except a large number of ChanSpy write buffer overflow messages, which I also don't understand). How can I discover whether these

Hello again, I am using mix monitor and the majority of the sound records perfectly. I then get a "Internal Data Stream Error" near the end of the sound file. Has anyone ever seen this? I am allowing the ULAW amd ALAW codecs and an example dialplan entry is ; ; phone line phone1 exten => phone1,1,Answer() exten => phone1,2,MixMonitor(test.wav|av(0)V(0)) exten =>

I have not been able to access the UJS site, http://www.ujs4rails.com/ for two days. Does that mean there are problems or that it has been incorporated into Rails core? In general, what do you think of using UJS instead of RJS? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

It seems that tab traversal between TextCtrl widgets doesn''t work by default. How do you enable that? -- R. Mark Volkmann Partner, Object Computing, Inc.

Hi, I''ve been experimenting with ip route for the last few days to get load sharing accross 2 providers working. While it works most of the time, on a few occasions, packets are routed to the wrong interface. I''m not sure to understand rules and routes traversal correctly (I couldn''t find answers in the howto). So, here are my questions: 1. How does the rule

I deployed the xvp appliance(latest) for xcp 1.1. User who are behind the nat router are unable to get the consoles. they are getting network error: connection timed out. is xvp is not nat aware? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

Below is my attempt at changing the focus from one text control to the next control after a person presses the tab key. The wxTE_PROCESS_TAB style property has been selected for each of the controls. What corrections do I have to make? Thanks. #!/usr/bin/env ruby require ''rubygems'' require ''wx'' require ''tp1.rb'' class MainFrame < TPSC

Hi, All I have asterisk installed behind non-symmetric NAT, so I have NAT traversal issues. How can I use STUN or TURN to register with the other end? Or Asterisk doesn't support it? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070718/de87a89b/attachment.htm

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Thanks

Hello Experts, When we can expect Security Update for Perl Vulnerability CVE-2016-1238 on CentOS 6.8 and 7.2? -- With Thanks & Regards: Sidharth Sharma

Hi, I am using RGL for some of the graph implementations. My requirements is such that I need to find out all nodes that are at distance less than 3. For this, I thought of traversing the graph using BFS and stop the traversal when i reach 4th level. But how do I do this? regards, Sandeep G -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You

For anyone who doesn't subscribe to the security list (you should!) https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rubyonrails-security/NkKc7vTW70o/NxW_PDBSG3AJ You may want to note that an earlier advisory made out that only apps using *action in their routes were affected, but this turned out not to be true Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2021-06-21 Product: Dovecot Vendor: OX Software GmbH Internal reference: DOV-4476 (Bug ID) Vulnerability type: CWE-24: Path Traversal: '../filedir' Vulnerable version: 2.3.11-2.3.14 Vulnerable component: imap, pop3, submission, managesieve Report confidence: Confirmed Solution status: Fixed by Vendor Fixed version: 2.3.14.1 Vendor notification: 2021-03-22

Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2021-06-21 Product: Dovecot Vendor: OX Software GmbH Internal reference: DOV-4476 (Bug ID) Vulnerability type: CWE-24: Path Traversal: '../filedir' Vulnerable version: 2.3.11-2.3.14 Vulnerable component: imap, pop3, submission, managesieve Report confidence: Confirmed Solution status: Fixed by Vendor Fixed version: 2.3.14.1 Vendor notification: 2021-03-22

Hello, I have several * servers behind a SER server (in a local ip range). The SER server is also publicy reachable. On the other site, I have SIP clients that are behind another NAT or in the same NAT range as the * server. Can someone give me some directions/hints etc. on how to make this work. I think I should be using MediaProxy with SER. But do the SIP clients need to register at the SER

It seems to me that ipsecnat tunnel type is not complete. Latest drafts of ipsec nat-traversal use udp port 4500 for nat-traversal communications. (It''s called port floating). That is needed to get rid of ugly ipsec passthru devices. Now ipsecnat opens port udp/500 from any source port. And I think ipsecnat won''t work at all with gw zone defined? I''m not sure about

Has anyone extended Rails''s acts_as_tree to use the Modified Preorder Traversal algorithm? This is a really clever trick for optimizing access to trees stored in databases, as described lucidly in this article: http://www.sitepoint.com/article/hierarchical-data-database/2 It adds two integer fields, a "left counter" and "right counter", to each row. By

Hi List, After some research, it seems the only reasonable thing to do in order to get SIP phones behind NAT working reasonably well without fiddling with the DSL router is to have some kind of far end nat traversal mechanism. Is there any way to do this with open source tools? I've seen somewhere that far end nat traversal can be achieved with SER + nathelper does the job... has anybody