Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec 1.0.8? Am I likely to run into problems? Would it be best advised to wait or can I go ahead now? Thanks, Yitzhak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071212/c6fcea0f/attachment.html
It''s likely to fall completely on its face in a horrific manner, you''ll enjoy life much more if you use edge rspec. Nathan Sutton fowlduck at gmail.com rspec edge revision 3052 rspec_on_rails edge revision 3049 rails edge revision 8269 On Dec 11, 2007, at 5:48 PM, Yitzhak Bar Geva wrote:> Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec > 1.0.8? Am I likely to run into problems? > Would it be best advised to wait or can I go ahead now? > Thanks, > Yitzhak > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I highly recommend using piston for this. Works like a breeze here. Stefan 2007/12/12, Nathan Sutton <nathan.sutton at gmail.com>:> > It''s likely to fall completely on its face in a horrific manner, > you''ll enjoy life much more if you use edge rspec. > > Nathan Sutton > fowlduck at gmail.com > rspec edge revision 3052 > rspec_on_rails edge revision 3049 > rails edge revision 8269 > > On Dec 11, 2007, at 5:48 PM, Yitzhak Bar Geva wrote: > > > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec > > 1.0.8? Am I likely to run into problems? > > Would it be best advised to wait or can I go ahead now? > > Thanks, > > Yitzhak > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-- Bekk Open Source http://boss.bekk.no -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071212/25c93a5b/attachment.html
On Dec 12, 2007 12:48 AM, Yitzhak Bar Geva <yitzhakbg at gmail.com> wrote:> > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec 1.0.8? Am I > likely to run into problems?When we released RSpec 1.0.8 there was no Rails 2.0. We always have to do a fair amount of tweaks to keep up with Rails, so the versions you''re talking about are incompatible. As a general rule: Each RSpec release will work with the latest Rails at the time of release. If you want to use a newer Rails, use RSpec trunk. Aslak> Would it be best advised to wait or can I go ahead now? > Thanks, > Yitzhak > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On Dec 12, 2007 4:01 AM, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 12, 2007 12:48 AM, Yitzhak Bar Geva <yitzhakbg at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec 1.0.8? Am I > > likely to run into problems? > > When we released RSpec 1.0.8 there was no Rails 2.0. We always have to > do a fair amount of tweaks to keep up with Rails, so the versions > you''re talking about are incompatible. > > As a general rule: Each RSpec release will work with the latest Rails > at the time of release. If you want to use a newer Rails, use RSpec > trunk.Do you think it would make sense to do an interim release of RSpec whenever a new Rails version gets released? It (probably) shouldn''t be based off of trunk, but rather the last stable release, with whatever little bug fixes may be required to work with Rails. That way there''s no question...for any Rails version, people have the choice of using a stable version of RSpec trunk. Pat
On Dec 12, 2007 10:17 PM, Pat Maddox <pergesu at gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 12, 2007 4:01 AM, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2007 12:48 AM, Yitzhak Bar Geva <yitzhakbg at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec 1.0.8? Am I > > > likely to run into problems? > > > > When we released RSpec 1.0.8 there was no Rails 2.0. We always have to > > do a fair amount of tweaks to keep up with Rails, so the versions > > you''re talking about are incompatible. > > > > As a general rule: Each RSpec release will work with the latest Rails > > at the time of release. If you want to use a newer Rails, use RSpec > > trunk. > > Do you think it would make sense to do an interim release of RSpec > whenever a new Rails version gets released?We try to do releases right after rails releases - that''s why we''re working hard to get 1.1 out the door now.> It (probably) shouldn''t > be based off of trunk, but rather the last stable release, with > whatever little bug fixes may be required to work with Rails. That > way there''s no question...for any Rails version, people have the > choice of using a stable version of RSpec trunk. > > Pat > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
Hi there, Would it make sense to put up a page on an RSpec wiki where a table of good combinations (versions of rails and rspec) would be maintained? Anyway, I think a wiki would be a good idea. Stefan 2007/12/13, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>:> > On Dec 12, 2007 10:17 PM, Pat Maddox <pergesu at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2007 4:01 AM, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Dec 12, 2007 12:48 AM, Yitzhak Bar Geva <yitzhakbg at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Is it OK to go ahead and generate a Rails 2.0 project with RSpec > 1.0.8? Am I > > > > likely to run into problems? > > > > > > When we released RSpec 1.0.8 there was no Rails 2.0. We always have to > > > do a fair amount of tweaks to keep up with Rails, so the versions > > > you''re talking about are incompatible. > > > > > > As a general rule: Each RSpec release will work with the latest Rails > > > at the time of release. If you want to use a newer Rails, use RSpec > > > trunk. > > > > Do you think it would make sense to do an interim release of RSpec > > whenever a new Rails version gets released? > > We try to do releases right after rails releases - that''s why we''re > working hard to get 1.1 out the door now. > > > It (probably) shouldn''t > > be based off of trunk, but rather the last stable release, with > > whatever little bug fixes may be required to work with Rails. That > > way there''s no question...for any Rails version, people have the > > choice of using a stable version of RSpec trunk. > > > > Pat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-- Bekk Open Source http://boss.bekk.no -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071213/78fa69bb/attachment.html