Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Asterisk behind Multi-NAT question"
2004 May 28
2
Asterisk with Draytek 2600V
I am unable to get a my Draytek working with our Asterisk server. I can
make/recieve calls but get no audio. I have tried the various codecs at the
Vigor end but still getting nothing. I looked at sip debug (below) but am
new to Asterisk and don't really know what I am looking for. Asterisk works
fine with XLITE so I know my installation is ok.
Sip read:
INVITE
2003 Apr 23
6
OT: Multiple SIP phones behind NAT gateway?
Hi,
I know this is slightly off topic but I figured the knowlege here is probably the best on the subject..
I want to setup remote offices with 4 to 6 SIP phones (SNOM 200) using ADSL and the internet to connect to the Asterisk box..
These phone will be behind an ADSL router using NAT...
I don't want to setup another Asterisk system in each office so IAX is not an option..
I could use
2004 Dec 11
1
looking for input on broadband router with QoS and VPN support
Hi,
We're installing an * box next week (pbxtra from fonality) and I'm
trying to come up with a solution for remote users that want a phone in
their home. I need VPN and QoS capability, wireless support would be a
nice to have. Ethernet handoff is fine, i don't need integrated dsl or
cable modem...
I've been googling and cruising the list and can find bits and pieces
2004 Jan 14
6
How to park and pickup a call
Hi All,
How to park and pickup a call? The scenario of park and pickup
described as below.
UserA made a call to UserB, and the call ware connected,
Then UserB parked (or hold) the call, and told UserC to pickup
the call on one line, and then, UserC pressed some keys to
pickup the call.
Who can tell me what's the Park/Pickup's typical flow in
the Asterisk. And how to set the sip.conf,
2010 Feb 10
1
Nat Issue - is this Draytek || Asterisk?
I'm trying to debug a NAT issue and I can't make up my mind if the
problem is with my Vigor 2800 or Asterisk 1.6.2. I know the Draytek is
alleged to suffer from nat 'issues' but I did not have the issue with
1.6.1 - so I'm wondering if something has changed?
The Draytek offers 'NAT & Routed' on a single device - so my Asterisk
sits on a Public IP, and I have a
2008 Jul 07
5
IPSEC tunnel up, but no traffic coming through
Hi all,
I finally got my IPSec tunnel from my Fedora firewall system (running
Shorewall 4.0.6) to a remote Draytek Router up-and-running, but I''m having
difficulties directing traffic through the tunnel. From the output of
"racoon -F -f racoon.conf" and the connection status page of the Draytek I
can tell the tunnel is UP, but ping and traceroute requests to several hosts
2003 Aug 13
1
SIP NAT question
> From: George Lin [mailto:glin@cosini.com]
>
> I want to deploy multiple SIPs phone in our office. And we have
shutdown
> the
> firewall at our office router(with ip 211.x.x.x). we have deployed the
> asterisk with IP 218.x.x.x.
>
> All SIP phones have 192.x.x.x.
We have something similar George, * sits outside the firewall with a
registered IP address, the SIP phones
2005 Jun 03
3
Sip UA behind NAT
I am trying to make 1 soft SIP UA behind NAT connect to a public hard
CISCO UA via a public asterisk server. The CISCO UA can hear the voice
from the SIP UA but not vice versa. I do set nat to yes for the soft
phone. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Below is my sip.conf
[general]
port = 8060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all
2011 Nov 21
1
vigor 2920 problems
One of our clients has a Draytek Vigor 2920- their natted Snom phones
behind it are registered to an Asterisk 1.4 server on an external public IP.
I've set QOS, bandwidth management and turned off the SIP ALG via telnet
but I'm still having some problems with some of the phones losing
registration if Asterisk is restarted.
I can see the phones sending SIP REGISTER messages, but they
2004 Dec 02
6
Asterisk crashes my router!?
Hi,
Does anybody else have problems like this.
I'm in the UK with a 1mb ADSL service from Eclipse. I have a Draytek
Vigour 2600 ADSL router.
My * box is configured with a public IP address which is presented on
one of the switch ports on the rear of the router.
When there is some SIP activity, incoming mainly, towards my * box,
the router will lockup after a short period?!
I've tried
2003 Apr 14
6
Asterisk and SNOM 200
Hi,
I have just got my SNOM 200 to start doing some real testing with *..
I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is that normal? does anyone actually use GSM??
Also are there any 'gotcha's' that I need to look out for so I don't spend hours trying to get somthing working that really doesn't work anyway..
Thanks..
later..
--
2007 Jun 01
3
SIP & NAT ...
So I thought I had SIP and NAT cracked a long time ago, but something's
just happened that's sort of upset the cart )-:
I have an * box behind a NAT firewall. Nothing unusual there, this is
something I've done many times - sip.conf has the correct
nat=
localnet=
externip=
settings, the router has ports 5060-5069 and 10000-20000 forwarded to the
internal IP address of the
2007 Jun 06
3
1.4 Zaptel/Sangoma Issues on CentOS
Any ideas? Sangoma support is closed for the evening.
I have the latest Sangoma drivers and Asterisk 1.4 everything installed.
When I fire up asterisk, I keep getting "Primary D-Channel on span 1 up"
repeated over and over. The B channels never come up. There are no
errors in any of the logs, zttool, or the wanpipe tools.
Intense pri debug output:
< Unnumbered frame:
< SAPI:
2003 Oct 27
2
BOTH UAs behind same FW/NAT
hello,
can anybody help me with folloving problem
I have asterisk with the public IP and two UAs (snom100, x-lite) in the
same private network behind the same FW/NAT.
All is working good, but whan I tried to establish call between these
two UAs, first 10-15 second is nothing to hear and then is the quality
terrible :(
Can anyone tell how to get it work with normal quality ?
best regards
2006 Jan 07
4
Draytek Vigor 2900 & Asterisk
I'm in conversation with Draytek's pre-sales dept..............
Here's the most recent reply:
<Hello,
We really don't know of anyone who has run an Asterisk server on
a Vigor2900. There are doubtless people around, but it's relatively
rare. Most people don't run SIP servers.
Regards,>
All I want to know is, if I buy one of these routers, will it break my setup
or
2007 Jul 21
10
Best and easiest soft phone for my Dad..
Hi,
Here is the situation.. My Dad is working on contract in overseas.. He
has internet access in his hotel.. He wants to be able to talk to my Mum
but the calls are expensive..
I have an asterisk box setup for my business and it has a public IP
etc.. My Mum has access to a working phone extension on this box..
I got my Dad to install X-Lite but for some reason it won't register and
2009 Aug 12
6
Shorewall (Openswan) IPSEC VPN MASQ Problem
Hi,
I have setup a IPSEC VPN using Openswan to connect a Draytek router to a
CentOS 5.2/Shorewall 4.2.9 firewall. The VPN establishes OK but I''m
getting a problem with packets from the left hand subnet getting
masqueraded rather than routed down the IPSEC VPN as though they were
going out onto the net. I''ve spent the last day searching Google and so
far I''ve hit a
2019 Mar 05
1
getent not working after installing firewall
Hai Peter,
Chipping in here.
> >
> Hi Rowland,
>
> You are right about firewall boxes. At least Cisco ASA is a terribly
> (over) complicated device. People who are not Cisco pros should be
> warned. Stay away, you will just waste your time, get frustrated, and
> get sleepless nights.
>
> I don't blame the Cisco ASA here. In my case, I hadn't much
2006 Jan 30
1
Gateways
I have a DrayTek Vigor3300V gateway with 8 FXO ports. I am trying to
configure asterisk to dial out on the gateway. I have one of the FXO ports
configured on sip account 100. If I dial the sip account then the router
gives me dial tone, with which I can dial a number. Unfortunately this is
not the behaviour I desire. I want to setup the FXO port as a trunk with out
it giving me a dial tone. I have
2015 Feb 10
1
IAX port
On 10 February 2015 at 12:55, jg <webaccounts173 at jgoettgens.de> wrote:
>
>> Some firewalls have a 'consistent NAT' option that needs to be enabled,
>> otherwise you get the symptoms described.
>>
>> While reading about NAT, I came across this web site:
> http://nattest.net.in.tum.de/
> The test tool looks at various NAT related properties and