similar to: Asterisk on UML (User Mode Linux)

I have noticed that Asterisk (version 1.2.13) is not hanging up a call when the wifi handset moves out of range. My setup is Nokia E61 connected to wifi access point (private IP range) and then to server on internet (public IP). I have been testing using the talking clock application, and walking out of range does not hang up the call. The call will continue for hours even though the handset

I am trying to setup an interactive menu where a caller hits the main menu and can then dial an extension. As far as I can tell the "Waitexten" app is failing to read 3 digits and just reading the first and then announcing that it is invalid since all extensions are 3 digits. How do I make Waitexten wait for 3 digits? I have setup the extension "100" for users to reach the

I'm wondering what the best way of building a UML image is; I tried the following based on documents I found on the web for FC2 mkdir -p $T/etc $T/dev $T/proc $T/sys $T/var/tmp $T/var/cache/yum \ $T/var/lock/rpm $T/var/cache/yum/update/headers \ $T/var/cache/yum/update/packages touch $T/etc/fstab mknod $T/dev/null c 1 3 chmod 666 $T/dev/null mount --bind /proc

If SIGTERM is blocked in the main program, then it ends up still being blocked in the subprocess after we fork. This means that we cannot kill qemu by sending SIGTERM to it. This commit fixes the problem by unblocking SIGTERM unconditionally after fork. Thanks: wtfuzz on IRC for reporting and analysis. --- lib/launch-direct.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ lib/launch-uml.c | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files

Hi folks, sorry for my bad english, but I am not a native speaker. I want to setup a virtual firewall-host in a UML-Session. I''m using Kernel 2.4.27-um1 and shorewall 2.2.2-2 from Debian sarge. I have 4 nic''s in my System: eth0 -> localnet 0 eth1 -> localnet 1 eth2 -> wlan eth3 -> DSL/ppp0 I''m using four bridges br0,br1,br2,br3. The UML firewall host is

UML diagrams can be really helpful for explaining how a piece of code works (such as the diagrams in your klang project on github). The main reason I don't draw them is that I haven't found convenient tools to use which integrate well with my workflow. Doxygen produces class diagrams, but I would really like to have something which produces sequence diagrams (such as

Hi Sean Silva, Maybe I am the only one who is trying to use UML. In my team, I am also the only one who draws UML diagrams. I expected there be someone who use UML like me. But it's maybe not as your opinion. Maybe doxygen is enough for majority of people. Thanks for your reply. Sincerely Journeyer J. Joh 2012/12/25 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu>: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at

(Me Too ++: I''m running into the same issues with a non-nptl DB4 and rpm on rhel4) And making it even more interesting: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/release-notes/as-x86/ "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 will no longer include support for LinuxThreads. Therefore, applications that require LinuxThreads support must be updated before they will be able to

I'm looking for a recipe for a 3 way call where one of the parties can (without using the flash button) dial-out and add a third participant to the call. I tried Googling but it seems I'm missing a key search term. The reason I wanted to avoid using the flash button is that some handsets don't have it (nokia E61 who's 2 way calling via sip is also broken) Something like: 1.

Any body here has used ruby-uml from http://ruby-uml.rubyforge.org/ ?? I dont know how to use it, would you mind to share your experience on it? OR Have you found plug-in or gem for generating application code like controllers, models, views to sequence diagram ? I have tried RailRoad, but it can not create sequence diagram, only class diagram for controllers and models. Thank You for your

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Any chance of getting a snapshot/patch to apply to 2.6.21? Also, the FAQ doesn't mention UML but at a glance the two virtualizations look very similar - or am I missing something? The address space stuff looks like what skas0 does in uml? Cheers Antoine -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG

Hey ..This looks very much like the user-mode linux i used to work on. not gone thru the Xen specs but what crossbow looks like is solaris version of UML[user-mode linux] . last time i was almost killed testing free/swan on a virtual testbed using UML. gosh... matching the root filesystem version with the kernel was the biggest fight...lately had to build my own with mkrootfs :) ... best view of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Any chance of getting a snapshot/patch to apply to 2.6.21? Also, the FAQ doesn't mention UML but at a glance the two virtualizations look very similar - or am I missing something? The address space stuff looks like what skas0 does in uml? Cheers Antoine -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG

Hello list, I'd like to know if people use UML tool to analyze and/or document LLVM/Clang. I use StarUML. It's free and very good though it's free. But I consider using a commercial program. Because the organization I belong is willing to support for this. I don't think I will use these tools to write code. I think I will use these to do a documentation and analyze code. So the

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Journeyer J. Joh <oosaprogrammer at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you use one of these tools? If so let me know your experience. > And I don't believe people use these to generate code for LLVM/Clang. I personally don't use any tool like that. My impression is that most developers here do not use any kind of UML code generation; I could, of course,

* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added

* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added

Has anyone been able to get UserModeLinux to work under CentOS5? I've got an image which works fine under CentOS4.4 but when I try it under CentOS5 then it hangs just after mounting root kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. Now, I'd read this was a known issue because of

Hello, For those those who speak french and are interested. I wrote a guide about Uml and Xen virtualisation solution for course purpose. Cheers, François Visconte _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, I've got a CentOS 5.3 machine that i'd like to virtualize some services on. Currently a reinstall for virtualization isn't doable so i thought about user-mode-linux, UML. Has anyone run this on Centos5? If so, feedback prose and cons appreciated. Thanks. Dave.