similar to: Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk (Vidura Senadeera)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk (Vidura Senadeera)"

2007 Aug 21
6
Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk
Dear All, I would like to get community's feedback with regard to RAID1 ( Software or Hardware) implementations with asterisk. This is my setup Motherboard with SATA RAID1 support CENT OS 4.4 Asterisk 1.2.19 Libpri/zaptel latest release 2.8 Ghz Intel processor 2 80 GB SATA Hard disks 256 MB RAM digium PRI/E1 card Following are the concerns I am having I'm planing to put this asterisk
2007 Aug 28
0
Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk (Andrew Joakimsen)
Dear Andrew, Thanks for your kind responce. Regards, vidura. ============================= > Motherboard with SATA RAID1 support That's a mulit-port SATA controller with RAID in the driver (software). > 256 MB RAM Use a little more RAM. > digium PRI/E1 card Is there any reason you aren't using Sangoma cards? > 1. If I use Software RAID, what would be the impact to my
2007 Mar 15
0
Re: busy/hangup/answer detection in PRI E1 channels (Vidura Senadeera)
> Hi Gareth Blades & Doug, > > Thanks so much for for the feedback. I have searched on lot of documents > but couldn't able to find clear answer regarding it. > > I hope you guys replies are very much help all in aterisk community. > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Vidura Senadeera, > > Network Engineer, > > Debug Solutions > > Sri Lanka .
2006 Dec 27
1
Software RAID1 issue
When a new system CentOS-4.4 is built the swap partition is always reversed... Note md3 below, the raidtab is OK, I have tried various raid commands to correct. swapoff -a raidstop /dev/md3 mkraid /dev/md3 --really-force swapon -a And then I get a proper ourput for /proc/mdstat, but when I reboot /proc/mdstat again reads as below, with md3 [0] [1] reversed. [root]# cat /proc/mdstat
2009 Jul 03
2
software raid1 syncing
hello all, I have a setup that is raid 1 and put the mirrored drive back in and now it is still showing as degraded saying: raid1: raid set md6 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors with this message on all the raids.i know i am wrong by saying this but i thought putting in the driving and rebooting would start the re syncing itself. what do i have to do to add this back in, i am so confused with this
2013 Oct 09
1
mdraid strange surprises...
Hey, I installed 2 new data servers with a big (12TB) RAID6 mdraid. I formated the whole arrays with bad blocks checks. One server is moderately used (nfs on one md), while the other not. One week later, after the raid-check from cron, I get on both servers a few block_mismatch... 1976162368 on the used one and a tiny bit less on the other...? That seems a tiny little bit high... I do the
2002 Feb 28
5
Problems with ext3 fs
Hi, Apologies, this is going to be quite long - I'm going to provide as much info as possible. I'm running a system with ext3 fs on software RAID. The RAID set-up is as shown below: jlm@nijinsky:~$ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 hdc1[1] hda1[0] 96256 blocks [2/2] [UU] md5 : active raid1 hdk1[1] hde1[0]
2023 Mar 30
2
Performance: lots of small files, hdd, nvme etc.
Hello there, as Strahil suggested a separate thread might be better. current state: - servers with 10TB hdds - 2 hdds build up a sw raid1 - each raid1 is a brick - so 5 bricks per server - Volume info (complete below): Volume Name: workdata Type: Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 5 x 3 = 15 Bricks: Brick1: gls1:/gluster/md3/workdata Brick2: gls2:/gluster/md3/workdata Brick3:
2008 Mar 23
4
md raid1 - no speed improvement
Hi, I have two 320 GB SATA disks (/dev/sda, /dev/sdb) in a server running CentOS release 5. They both have three partitions setup as RAID1 using md (boot, swap, and an LVM data partition). # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sdb3[1]
2007 Mar 09
0
Re: Back to back E1 - asterisk <=> toshiba pbx - Call droping issue [ ref:00D36mPe.50032wycQ:ref ]
Hi All, Thanks for every one who helped me on this regard. I think i was able to rictify the problem. what i did is remove callprogress=yes usecallinpres=yes and restart asterisk. Today i didn't report any drop calls. Many thanks for Eric. :) I hope this situation will continue. Regards, Vidura. On 3/8/07, Vidura Senadeera <vidurased@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >
2007 Mar 08
0
Fwd: Back to back E1 - asterisk <=> toshiba pbx -Call droping
Before studying your configs, what have you tried so far? Did you change this? Also, try changing your second span timing from span=2,2,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 to span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4. Here is the documentation on voip-info for why it may be the cause of your issues http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Zaptel.conf+span+syntax span definition format:
2007 Mar 07
0
Back to back E1 - asterisk <=> toshiba pbx - Calldroping issue
As these problems are very time sensitive and frustrating, I suggest you document each change you make and do them one at a time so you can actually know what the problem was and not introduce new problems in the process. Find someone who is on the phone quite a bit and will give you an honest evaluation of the call dropping situation (unless you yourself are experiencing this issue too).
2007 Aug 23
0
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 88
-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:51 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 88 Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
2014 Feb 07
3
Software RAID1 Failure Help
I am running software RAID1 on a somewhat critical server. Today I noticed one drive is giving errors. Good thing I had RAID. I planned on upgrading this server in next month or so. Just wandering if there was an easy way to fix this to avoid rushing the upgrade? Having a single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think. Thanks. Feb 7 15:28:28 server smartd[2980]: Device: /dev/sdb
2007 Mar 07
1
Re: Back to back E1 - asterisk <=> toshiba pbx - Call droping
Hi steve and All, I'm attaching cat proc/interrupts out put, lspci -bv out put, zapa.conf, zaptel.conf for your information Thanks so much for the feedback and I do accordingly. Hope to get rid off this isue any how. To day also reported 10 call drops within 2 hours of period. fook forward to have your support on this regard. Thanks & Regards, Vidura Senadeera, Network Engineer,
2007 Sep 05
4
ztcfg error : TE110p error with " CAS signalling on span 1 conflicts with HDLC with ...
Dear All, I'm integrating avaya commuication manager difinity ver 1.0 with asterisk using B2B E1. following are the details of my H/W, zaptel configs and software installed. Digium TE110p asterisk 1.2.19 cent OS 4.4 zaptel 1.2.18 libpri 1.2.4 etc/zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,cas,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 when i ztcfg -vvv im having this error message and the E1 is not getting up. "cas
2011 Sep 07
1
boot problem after disk change on raid1
Hello, I have two disks sda and sdb. One of the was broken so I have changed the broken disk with a working one. I started the server in rescue mode, and created the partional table, and added all the partitions to the software raid. *I have added the partitions to the RAID, and reboot.* # mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sdb1 # mdadm /dev/md1 --add /dev/sdb2 # mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sdb3 # mdadm
2009 Jun 29
1
ISP< ->Asterisk <-> ATA <->DIALUP
Hellow, * I have a problem with dial up signalling. currently I have configured asterisk server and E1 card to ISP. then other side I am having ATA to PC for connecting internet through DialUP connection. is it possible and please send me the procedure how I can do it ?? * ISP< <-> Asterisk <-> ATA <-> DIALUP -- Thanks & Regards, Vidura Senadeera, Sri Lanka.
2007 Jan 19
1
Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 79
> > > Hi, > > > I checked by changing to from-zaptel, but no luck yet. Pls guide me on > this. > > Regards, > vudura senadeera > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 9 > > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:47:18 -0000 > > From: "Robert Jenkins" < raj@jrw.co.uk> > > Subject: RE: [asterisk-users]
2024 Jan 27
1
Upgrade 10.4 -> 11.1 making problems
You don't need to mount it. Like this : # getfattr -d -e hex -m. /path/to/brick/.glusterfs/00/46/00462be8-3e61-4931-8bda-dae1645c639e # file: 00/46/00462be8-3e61-4931-8bda-dae1645c639e trusted.gfid=0x00462be83e6149318bdadae1645c639e trusted.gfid2path.05fcbdafdeea18ab=0x30326333373930632d386637622d346436652d393464362d3936393132313930643131312f66696c656c6f636b696e672e7079