similar to: No subject

Im a 3-days-asterisk-newbie. In 3 weeks, I must have a PBX installed in a new office of ours: Panasonic or Asterisk. Asterisk would be, if I can emulate some Panasonic functions on Asterisk fast, to convince the executives. What I have done until now: Bought 1 Linksys pap2 (2 FXS), 1 Linksys SPA3102 (1 FXS + 1 FXO) for making asterisk tests. Configured Asterisk/Fedora 9 so I can make SIP->PSTN

have adaptors compatible with Asterisk, but explicitly say in the product titles that they're unlocked, which I think is the key. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Brian Cline <Brian at nw.brian.fm> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running Asterisk v1.6.1.11 internally with a few Linksys SIP > phones and will be receiving a machine containing a Dialogic card > for a

(Im' answering cc the list, so the knowledge keeps there, and maybe some more qualified answers become). Am Mittwoch, den 15.10.2008, 18:00 -0700 schrieb Francisco del rosario: > Hey Rodolfo... Need some help from you ... > I need to know what hardware do I need to make SIP calls if I set-up > asterisk > So the situation is that I have a PC and configure the software of my PC to

I was having problems getting a Linksys PAP2T-NA to work with Pitney Bowes mailing station so it could use its modem to dial home and download postage/software updates. After scowering the web, I couldn't seem to find a definite how to article on what settings were needed. I finally came up some settings by combining the information from various places around the 'net. I have typed out

Hello all, I am running Asterisk 1.4.17. I have 2 Linksys SPA3102's and one PAP2-NA (I have a second on order). They have G729a built into them. This is supposed to be compatable with G729. I was trying to have them use that codec when they talk to each other, but it seems they always switch to alaw or ulaw (depending on my sip.conf file). Shouldn't they be able to use G729a in

an external program, which at this stage, is not customizable ... I don't know if alternatives (LiMO, Android, ...) would be more open to this customization but for Symbian, not only Nokia SIP client wouldn't let you autoanswer to SIP calls, but any other SIP client complying to Symbian design wouldn't support autoanswer. PS: Please, note that I'm far from being an expert in GSM

Any ideas ????? Jonn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [asterisk-users] Internal LAN echo problem Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:34:32 -0500 From: Jonn R Taylor <jonnt at taylortelephone.com> Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users

That's the main reason I opened this thread as it surprised me a bit ... > > > Any 2-wire analog leg will be a source of echo. Many, many, many calls > do not have a 2-wire leg. Even in handset audio circuit ? I was thinking that any handset is a potential echo source due to this audio circuit ... Do you agree ? > Think cell/mobile or endpoints with PRI or T-1. > >

If you don't use 'CERTVERIFY 1', then this will at least make sure that nobody can sniff your sessions without a large effort (...) > So, do I misunderstand CERTVERIFY directive ? Or is there a bug ? >> Can you reproduce such behaviour ? >> > > I'm not sure what is going on. Can you try running 'upsmon' with debugging > enabled? The following are

Hi all, I have an internal echo problem on my LAN only. I replaced the LAN switch with a new linksys 2024 with QOS and seemed to help but not fix the problem. Any ideas? Here in my setup - Dell PE6400 Dual 700, Asterisk 1.2.24/FreePBX, 2-NIC cards, one with a public ip and one with an internal ip, one PAP2, one SPA3102 and 2 BT101. I know that bt's are cheap that are known for echo

supported, beside Idle, On call and Ringing ? Can we expect this list to match DEVICE_STATE's one (UNKNOWN | NOT_INUSE | INUSE | BUSY | INVALID | UNAVAILABLE | RINGING | RINGINUSE | ONHOLD) > Might be worth seeing if other phones do the same. > > S > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

... Thanks, anyway for telling as at least, it reflects your needs. > > > You want NT PtMP and i second that, > not being limited on the asterisk > side is a must in the > telephony ecosystem, since the legacy PABX aren't alwsys easy to > reconfigure. > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy. Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ? That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP platform too specific ? what is the official policy ? README starts with

sort of standard for getting media players to support dynamically mixing different tracks and also making it easy for artists to do. On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andy <andycool22 at gmail.com> wrote: > i'll chime in and say that i would love to get music recorded in > separate tracks, maybe there would be some kind of settings embedded > in the files so i could hear them

sort of standard for getting media players to support dynamically mixing different tracks and also making it easy for artists to do. On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andy <andycool22 at gmail.com> wrote: > i'll chime in and say that i would love to get music recorded in > separate tracks, maybe there would be some kind of settings embedded > in the files so i could hear them

sort of standard for getting media players to support dynamically mixing different tracks and also making it easy for artists to do. On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andy <andycool22 at gmail.com> wrote: > i'll chime in and say that i would love to get music recorded in > separate tracks, maybe there would be some kind of settings embedded > in the files so i could hear them

mailboxes). Are you certain that removing either 612 or 610 mailbox would keep Asterisk from complaining ? > > However, the MWI does not indicate voice mails for 610 and I keep seeing > this error message: > > ERROR[2549]: app_voicemail.c:1630 messagecount: Couldn't find mailbox > 610 in context a10 > > However, mailbox 610 is clearly defined in voicemail.conf: >

could be "hot". Is there any chance this would cause the card to fail after a while? It appears this site just had 4 port Digium card fail today. > Also, I am trying to cross connect with another Asterisk system with > > the normal LBO setting (i.e. span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs) but as of yet the > > systems aren't seeing each other at all. Could the side with the high >

connecting legacy PBX to Asterisk (for the very same reason, those PBX use TE-PTMP). If others could join this thread and say if they agree or not with NT-PTMP being the 2nd most needed mode, would be great. Please, do not hesitate to comment. > > > Right now, I would not preclude the possibility that NT-PTMP support > might be added, but I could not give you a concrete time at which