similar to: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Re: Dialtone when automatically picking up.

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

I'm in the process of setting up a 'phone tree', and are running into some problems. My goal is for users to dial a phone number, the asterisk system picks it up, plays the greeting, and users can type whatever they want into the system. What actually happens is users dial the phone number, asterisk picks up and additionally goes off-hook on another line, plays the greeting and

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) I just got this link. They're saying they will (or only the could?) support Vorbis with future Firmware Versions. http://www.frontierlabs.com/NEXIA.html -- Daniel <p>Have you noticed that all you need to grow healthy, vigorous grass is a crack in your sidewalk? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

Greetings, list! My boss would like some statistics on how many calls are answered out of specific queues during a given time period, and I'm not sure how exactly to obtain those stats. Here's how our queue system works. 1) Call comes in and enters our 'ring' queue where the phones ring for 15 seconds (caller hears the standard ring tone). 2) After 15 seconds, the caller

Hi everyone, Sorry for forwarding and top-posting this email again but its as if my TDM40b has keeled over yesterday. After a few hours last night and swapping the card to another asterisk server (with exactly the same result) I needed to have the FXS ports working ASAP this morning so I have repaced the functionality of the TDM40b with some Grandstream handytones which I already had in

Hi! Thank you all for the info! But I think I haven't explained my scenario well enough. I am not relaying the calls to SIP. What happens is the following (the scenario is: a call started from an ISDN E1 PBX, through the asterisk, to the PSTN, and was answered by the remote party): 1. A CONNECT comes from the PSTN containing a Display IE (which has info sent by the telco that is used for

Hi! Thank you all for the info! But I think I haven't explained my scenario well enough. I am not relaying the calls to SIP. What happens is the following (the scenario is: a call started from an ISDN E1 PBX, through the asterisk, to the PSTN, and was answered by the remote party): 1. A CONNECT comes from the PSTN containing a Display IE (which has info sent by the telco that is used for

Hi! Thank you all for the info! But I think I haven't explained my scenario well enough. I am not relaying the calls to SIP. What happens is the following (the scenario is: a call started from an ISDN E1 PBX, through the asterisk, to the PSTN, and was answered by the remote party): 1. A CONNECT comes from the PSTN containing a Display IE (which has info sent by the telco that is used for

Hi! Thank you all for the info! But I think I haven't explained my scenario well enough. I am not relaying the calls to SIP. What happens is the following (the scenario is: a call started from an ISDN E1 PBX, through the asterisk, to the PSTN, and was answered by the remote party): 1. A CONNECT comes from the PSTN containing a Display IE (which has info sent by the telco that is used for

Hi! Thank you all for the info! But I think I haven't explained my scenario well enough. I am not relaying the calls to SIP. What happens is the following (the scenario is: a call started from an ISDN E1 PBX, through the asterisk, to the PSTN, and was answered by the remote party): 1. A CONNECT comes from the PSTN containing a Display IE (which has info sent by the telco that is used for