similar to: PRI and Local numbers

I have had many discussions with Synology about this and other attitudes they have been displaying in the last few years. Also if you log into their NAS, using ssh and take a look at some of the comments that have been added into the "ETC" configs, it makes it very clear. They have also been removing any posts relating to methods or help given in the forums that relate to SAMBA ,

Ok, I have trixbox working how I want. How do I now (cheaply as possibly) get a phone number so people can call it from any number? I am just doing a prototype so just want it done cheaply so I can demo it to my supervisors. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

This is the essence of the last message from Synology: For Synology the problem is no problem... They simply say now, we never claimed we are compatible with Samba AD, only with Windows AD, Azure AD and Synology Directory Server: ?? ?"Domain/LDAP ?? ?Features ??? Seamless integration with Windows AD, Azure AD Domain Service, and LDAP servers" See:

Hi, On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Kent Hauser wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Had any progress? I've also by stymied for a clean solution. Previously, I > used a simple SED script from executed from "/etc/ppp/ppp.linkup" to edit a > "setkeys" script which then negotiated with the office ascend router/gw & all > was VPN heaven. However, I now need to negotiate

On 02/29/2016 05:33 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > More info in my ssl_error.log: > > Mon Feb 29 14:32:06 2016] [info] [client 10.64.118.59] SSL handshake failed: HTTP spoken on HTTPS port; trying to send HTML error page > [Mon Feb 29 14:32:06 2016] [info] SSL Library Error: 336027804 error:1407609C:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:http request speaking HTTP to HTTPS port!? Well, that

Sirs/Ladies, Not sure if anyone saw anything like that before... I was playing with an Asterisk setup with a Grandstream BT101 (1.0.5.11) and www.voipjet.com (IAX2). The other devices I have home (Sipura 3k and DTA-310) seem to work just fine, but the Grandstream seems to suffer from one-way voice (remote end can't hear me). The only workaround I found so far (have not spoken with VOIPJet

Hey All, I am looking for some advice on setting up a test lab for Asterisk systems that I plan to install at client sites. Most clients will be using PRI. Does anyone have any suggestions on equipping a lab to be able to test Asterisk servers with T1 cards and SIP phones? I have seen some test equipment around the internet, but I'm not sure what the best is. I have also thought about

I'm interested in taking a persons spoken recorded name (First, Last) and converting the two spoken words to text. Is there any solutions out there that would make this possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090130/1e90ba97/attachment.htm

[This email is reposted without the log attaced. I have added more information to the end of this email as well] CVS head (unmodified) current as of today. We have asterisk connected to both the pstn and our pbx via two E1 pri connections. We use overlap dialing to cope with different number lengths in Sweden. Incoming calls work perfectly. Outgoing calls seem to not get the repsonse it

Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier.

Thought this might interest a few people on the asterisk list as well Cheers, Dean ________________________________ From: Dean Collins Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 1:49 PM To: 'newtech-1 at meetup.com' Subject: RE: [newtech-1] Uncovering Spoken Phrases in Encrypted Voice over IP Conversations Wow, of course how stupid, when someone says hello at the start of the call

When LLVM's configure finds a usable <pthread.h>, it prefers to use that rather than the home-grown stuff. However if LLVM is configured with --disable-pthreads, both mingw flavors produce the same results. BTW, I've tried to quantify the slowdown: a quick test indicates that LLVM build that uses pthreads is about 10% slower than the one which doesn't. This is less that I

Hello, We're in the process of moving to a PRI circuit for our asterisk switch. Can anyone point me in the right direction as far as PRI Cards are concerned? Thanks!

> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. > > In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything anymore. It is a nice short domain name though :)

On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:05 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: >> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. >> >> In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything

Hello, We're having some issues with CallerID and I thought someone here might be able to shed some light as none of our carriers seem to know what I'm talking about. The issues is this: A client of ours uses an after-hours voicemail service as mandated by their corporate office. We have a Day/Night setting that lets them turn this on and off. A call comes in from one of their

On 6/13/19 10:48 AM, Alexey A Nikitin via samba wrote: > According to the MS docs SID=('S-'+version+identifier authority value+domain or computer identifier+RID). The SIDs that don't contain RID are the special cases of Machine SID, Domain SID, Service SID, and some predefined universal well-known SIDs [1]. According to the common use in MS tools SID encompasses RID. And even in

> I'm now confident that I > can avoid using "type" by itself, and instead always use it in a > compound phrase (like type system) to avoid confusion. That leaves the > `.type` argument to many vctrs functions. I'm considering change it to > .prototype, because what you actually give it is a zero-length vector > of the class you want, i.e. a prototype of the

*Postdoc Position Computational Systems Biology 'Systems Bioinformatics: Computational Modelling Methods' f/m * * VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands * *Research project * The goal of the project is to develop and implement computer methods for computational modelling of biological systems. This encompasses methods for computational model assembly, execution, analysis and

On Thursday, 13 June 2019 09:18:25 PDT Goetz, Patrick G via samba wrote: > On 6/13/19 10:48 AM, Alexey A Nikitin via samba wrote: > > According to the MS docs SID=('S-'+version+identifier authority value+domain or computer identifier+RID). The SIDs that don't contain RID are the special cases of Machine SID, Domain SID, Service SID, and some predefined universal well-known