similar to: No subject

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "No subject"

2007 Jun 27
1
Self Calling test
I've had slew of problems with my Bell Canada Single Number Reach (SNR) dropping in the past couple of months. Another outage Monday for several hours has me wondering if there's a way to 1. Make a call out of my system via a PSTN back to my SNR line, say every 30 minutes (this I'm sure is easy enough via the call file...however...) 2. Track the outgoing call and match to an
2007 Jul 18
3
Remote vm system message pickup
Has anyone tried to do a script to pickup an ITSP voicemail. Lesnet provides an option for an overflow mailbox in the event a caller can get to my * box. I'd like my * to poll it and dump any messages found into my general mailbox Any ideas Similarly, a telco mailbox. It at least has the advantage of having stutter dial tone as a trigger Any hints or suggestions welcome D Dave Bour
2007 May 04
0
Semi-OT: useful things to do with XML browsers inphones
Requests 1. Directories linked to their databases 2 weather broadcasts 3 local traffic info. 4 local news headlines 5 sms send / receive 6 alarm on the phone of calendar events - not a call back, simply a beep and notice without pulling out a pda or opening outlook Couple of other "one of's" too, some very esoteric like evening's TV lineup, Dave Bour Desktop Solution
2007 Jun 06
0
Voip-info.org
Yes Dave Bour Desktop Solution Center 905.381.0077 dcbour@desktopsolutioncenter.ca For those who just want it to work... Giving you complete IT peace of mind. (Sent via Blackberry - hence message may be shorter than my usual verbose responses) PIN 4cc364db (as of March 24, 2007) ----- Original Message ----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
=20 =20 12:53:41.358166 IP (tos 0xb8, ttl 127, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], = proto: UDP (17), length: 856) 189.8.113.170.5060 > 189.8.126.177.5060: SIP, = length: 828 INVITE sip:7002 at 189.8.126.177:5060;user=3Dphone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 189.8.113.170:5060;branch=3Dz9hG4bKba4h2m2070fhnc4q20k1.1 Call-ID: d6dc25017b171144f35fb9e1c9c393a3 at 10.0.0.10
2015 May 08
0
[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hello Jean-Marc, **Resending.. not sure why subject got removed earlier** Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920) Note: Tested on BeagleboneBlack(Cortex-A8) fixed point on branch [1] ./test_unit_dft nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 88.394372 nfft=32 inverse=1,snr = 93.896470 nfft=128 inverse=0,snr = 89.185895 nfft=128 inverse=1,snr =
2015 May 08
0
(no subject)
Hi, Can you apply this change to the MDCT test and run it again. See if more (all) sizes pass. Given the results, I strongly suspect an overflow. Jean-Marc On 08/05/15 01:21 PM, Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but > test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920) > Note: Tested on
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
C:\>net view \\mummy System error 64 has occurred. The specified network name is no longer available. C:\>ping mummy Pinging mummy [192.168.2.2] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=3D32 time=3D63ms TTL=3D126 Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=3D32 time=3D63ms TTL=3D126 Any ideas? Thanks. ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C281B0.68A07A90 Content-Type: text/html;
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
found response from asterisk. =20 =20 On asterisk's log I see messages like: "Looking for conference on conference-context (domain serverIP)" =20 And: "Call from 'conference' to extension 'conference' rejected because extension not found." =20 =20 Does anyone have an ideia of why I'm getting that message? =20 Why does asterisk seem to be using domain
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
- the account is enabled until password expiry and I have no kind of = notification about the expiration of password.... - then a nice day the password really expires and, instead of been = forced to change it, the user is simply LOCKED OUT (account disabled) Note that in UNIX the user is still active as I've set a long Interval = beetwen pwd expiry and account locking ! The only
2015 May 08
1
(no subject)
Hello Jean-Marc, Yep, that was it.. with your patch, test_unit_mdct passes for all nfft. So, what you do you suggest the next step here is? Regards, Vish On 8 May 2015 at 12:30, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > Can you apply this change to the MDCT test and run it again. See if more > (all) sizes pass. Given the results, I strongly suspect an
2015 May 08
2
(no subject)
Hello Jean-Marc, Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920) Note: Tested on BeagleboneBlack(Cortex-A8) fixed point on branch [1] ./test_unit_dft nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 88.394372 nfft=32 inverse=1,snr = 93.896470 nfft=128 inverse=0,snr = 89.185895 nfft=128 inverse=1,snr = 93.537021 nfft=256 inverse=0,snr = 88.353151 nfft=256
2014 Feb 05
0
Make check failure on clone from 31 January
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Marcello Caramma (mcaramma) <mcaramma at cisco.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies if this is a known issue, but running make on revision e3187444692195957eb66989622c7b1ad8448b06 fails one of the tests when using fixed point configuration (floating point is ok) on my linux x86. > Note that libopus1.1, as extracted from the tar ball, is OK. > >
2010 Oct 21
1
asterisk 1.8 SIP register uri: peer field ?
Hello, Looking the asterisk 1.8 API documentation (http://www.asterisk.org/astdocs/api/index.html), I see a lot of new fields for sip register uris: register => [peer?][transport://]user[@domain][:secret[:authuser]]@host[:port][/extension][~expiry] But the *peer* is not explained anywhere. What it is for ? Regards, Guillaume Bour. -- Guillaume Bour<gbour at proformatique.com>
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
i click on a directory on the sco box that contains more than 200 files = in it, i either get a truncated list of the files in the directory or i = get a windows message box saying that the directory is not accessible, the specified server = cannot perform the requested operation. Performing the same operation from a windows NT 4, or windows98 computer = on the same network works great. Do I
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
And I have verified I am typing in the correct password. So it looks like there is some problem with encryption or something. smbd and nbmd are version 2.9999 (Debian packages) Thanks. --James Lamanna ------=_NextPart_000_006A_01C2864A.76DEA5C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
1.) Edited my SMB.conf inside the /etc/samba directory - I changed the = default workgroup name to match that of my Windows 2000 SP2 machine. I also edited the Public share to point to /home/markdog/apps = directory with open permissions for viewing. 2.) Manually started the SMBD and NMBD daemons- these are the copied = lines from a terminal prompt: [root@localhost /root]# smbd -D smbd -D
2014 Feb 05
4
Make check failure on clone from 31 January
Hi, Apologies if this is a known issue, but running make on revision e3187444692195957eb66989622c7b1ad8448b06 fails one of the tests when using fixed point configuration (floating point is ok) on my linux x86. Note that libopus1.1, as extracted from the tar ball, is OK. Specifically, the tests that fail are in celt/tests/test_unit_mdct: nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 85.341197 nfft=32 inverse=1,snr =
2007 Mar 06
0
No subject
When I first configure the client, in the Received Items, it shows all = items correctly, but then, when starting to donwload, they simply = disappear. All other folders are OK. Problem is just in inbox. I thing (although my tests were not exaustive) that deleting the .imap = folder solves the problem, but I just can't understand why, because it = is recreated again... Any help? Thank you,
2011 Apr 12
0
No subject
then the RTP must go through Asterisk since we need to know if any DTMF = was pressed. If both users and the server are not behind NAT and we set up for the = RPT to go direct if I am using INFO for DTMF, when using the t or T = option does the RTP go direct ? I am asking since from what I understand out of band DTMF was created so = that a leg in the middle can get the DTMF with out having to