similar to: SIP Termination with automatic debit

Has anyone tried using a debit/credit card terminal as such: Terminal <-> SPA-2000 <-> Public Internet <-> * <-> PRI I'm hoping someone will tell me they have done this successfully and rarely experience dropped calls. Though I'd like to hear from anyone who has tried and failed as well. Thanks, Trevor Peirce

I'm testing Teliax tall free number line and I'm experiencing long delay about 1sec. during conversation. When I call myself over FWD the response is normal no delay or cut messages. When I call my number over FWD the is a long delay, welcome message usually cuts off few first words and during conversation my voice arrives after about 1sec. delay. Since, the 800-number is only accessible

How can I map from a domain to the IP(s) given to its network interfaces? I'm not specifying a <mac .../> to the domain, so I don't have an upfront mapping setup. Is the best way to do some upfront mapping, e.g. install static MAC -> IP in the DHCP server and add <mac .../> to my domains? Best, matt

One would assume they have better things to do as they are quite busy. I think this is just a proactive measure meaning they say you cannot do it upfront so that in the event of a problem, it was predeclared. As to the rest of the TOS, I could be wrong but I got the impression that the owner of VoipJet speaks English as a second language due to some email exchanges. If that is the case, the TOS

Dear R-users, I'd like to turn a vector so it starts with it's end. For better understanding, this set of commands will do what I need: i <- seq(1:10) i_turned <- i for (j in 1:length(i)) i_turned[j] <- i[length(i)-j+1] now, i_turned is what I call turned. Is there a function which would make a script lighter? Thank you upfront for any hint. Best regards, Zroutik

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 January 2016 at 04:11, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > We have fairly large and complex code to handle relocations in > Writer.cpp, > > Target.cpp, OutputSections.cpp and InputSections.cpp. They started with > > simple code, but because each patch added

When writing a JIT compiler using LLVM, as I understand it, you can use two alternative APIs, MCJIT and Orc. The latter offers lazy compilation. Would it be accurate to say that if you want eager compilation - always compile an entire module upfront - you should use MCJIT? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Add optional MSI-X support: use a vector per virtqueue with fallback to a common vector and finally to regular interrupt. Teach all drivers to use it. I added 2 new virtio operations: request_vqs/free_vqs because MSI needs to know the total number of vectors upfront. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Here's a draft set of patches for MSI-X support in the

Add optional MSI-X support: use a vector per virtqueue with fallback to a common vector and finally to regular interrupt. Teach all drivers to use it. I added 2 new virtio operations: request_vqs/free_vqs because MSI needs to know the total number of vectors upfront. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Here's a draft set of patches for MSI-X support in the

I don't know if this has been mentioned yet: Voicepulse is now offering wholesale pricing and IAX2 connectivity for Asterisk users. No fees, pay as you go. They also offer incoming calls for $7.99 per month. See wholesale.voicepulse.com.

Russell Wallace via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > When writing a JIT compiler using LLVM, as I understand it, you can use two > alternative APIs, MCJIT and Orc. The latter offers lazy compilation. Would > it be accurate to say that if you want eager compilation - always compile > an entire module upfront - you should use MCJIT? +lang. My understanding is that

Hello ppl, Am looking at some PSTN termination providers in US. If this question has been repeated, please point me to the correct link, as I've tried searching the archives but have been unsuccesful so far. I have come across quite a few companies which provide the same, such as : Iconnecthere <http://www.iconnecthere.com> Vonage <http://www.vonage.com> Teliax

pci_enable_msix currently returns -EINVAL if you ask for more vectors than supported by the device, which would typically cause fallback to regular interrupts. It's better to return the table size, making the driver retry MSI-X with less vectors. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Hi Jesse, This came up when I was adding MSI-X support to virtio pci driver, which

Hi, I think it is time we start preparing and managing correctly a Xen Development wiki page. We already have one but it is a bit un-organized, with stale and poor content. I wanted to organize the page like that: - Have upfront a list of tasks, divided by subsystem (es. toolstack, hypervisor, domain support, etc.) - Have the corresponding entries organized like that: o Technical contact

pci_enable_msix currently returns -EINVAL if you ask for more vectors than supported by the device, which would typically cause fallback to regular interrupts. It's better to return the table size, making the driver retry MSI-X with less vectors. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Hi Jesse, This came up when I was adding MSI-X support to virtio pci driver, which

Dear R-users, I'd like to fit a sine function to my data. The result should have a format (and thus the formula, too) y ~ a + sin(x+b) where y and x are vectors, and a and b are (yet) unknown values. The data sets (vectors x and y) are OK, and I can do a simple lm fitting lm(y~x), or lm(y~I(sin(2*pi*x/360))), succesfully My issue is that I'm not able to do the optional linear shift in

Hi LLVM, Lang. I'm looking for a advice here. And I truly understand very little what the relocations are and how they work. The problem I want to solve is the case where a jitted code has to call back the host application to query additional data. I can think of 3 possible solutions: 1. Use built-in relocation resolver (in default memory manager?) and allow the JIT to find the

OK.. I'm up to my eyes in LD BS! I can't for the life of me understand how any carrier, either VoIP or traditional service provider can make heads or tails of how to hand off an * based call to an LD provider. Every provider I talk to, says I have to have a traditional T1 put in to their respective networks. I don't want to do this. I want a LD provider that can take a IP, SIP, IAX

I have added -debug-pass=Structure, and found the following: ModulePass Manager X Analysis Unnamed pass: implement Pass::getPassName() FunctionPass Manager Module Verifier Bitcode Writer Pass Arguments: -x -y -z FunctionPass Manager X Analysis Y Construction Z Construction Even for getAnalysis<Y>(*F) and getAnalysis<Z>(&F), all the passes X,

> Maybe not, but it's not impossible either - browsers manage to harden themselves against malicious input and they operate in a far hostile environment with many more input formats than we do. It is important to note how different they are. Both Firefox and Chromium have people working just to try to make them more secure. Compare that with LLVM: One week ago I pointed out that your patch