similar to: OT: "The Ignorance of Crowds" (was: OT Slightly: )

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adon Irani wrote: | woah do0d . that's a crackp0t theory if i ever heard one ., | | i'll offer an alternate theory . KiSS - keEp it simple sir ; why should | the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's | performance ? Icecast2 is icecast2. I'm talking about it's lack of innovation (ogg streaming! woopdefuckingdoo) as well as

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >> A switch to git is scary because it *is* a shift in how we think about >> the project. > > If you're coming at this from the "llvm development processes are > broken, we should switch to git so that we can fix them" then I'd > claim that you're doing it backwards. That's not what I'm

On Thu, February 19, 2015 13:41, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Linux distros experience on this front is terrible. Why? Linux OS's Because Linux-land is a bazaar and Apple-land is a cathedral. You cannot have consistency at the user level without stability at the OS and application framework level. That is simply not going to happen with FOSS. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE

> I'll put forth a theory here for everyone to chew on: > > Broadcasters wont convert their content to Ogg because the streaming > server (icecast2) it goes through currently fails to support the features > they are used to. And who would pin their operation on alpha-level code > where on average the last commit was 5-6 MONTHS ago!? > > Vorbis has actually abandoned TWO

Dale Ghent wrote: > Icecast2 is icecast2. I'm talking about it's lack of innovation (ogg > streaming! woopdefuckingdoo) as well as it's lack of functionality that > doesnt even near icecast 1.x (yp, acls, metadata, web-based admin). Apparently, you haven't tried Icecast2-alpha, yet. YP should work on Icecast2's side, but my understanding is that the current directory

My MCMC message has generated some interesting comments from R people. I will not try and deal with them individually but would comment that, as the most successful implementation of the bazaar (rather than cathedral) model of software development that I know apart from Linux, R would form a natural base for MCMC code development. Would it be possible under the GPL for BUGS (or BUGS-like code)

On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:12:37AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Big company's should take the responsibility to train and provide > skill development for their own staff. That would result in a beautiful cathedral of a patch. I know this is how some companies work. We are doing more of a bazaar thing here, though. In a bunch of subsystems it seems that you don't get the necessary

For your "non-technical" listeners, both WinAmp 2 and 3 support OGG. And it's free, as I'm sure you know. Challenge them to listen to the difference too. Once they hear how much better OGG sounds at the lower bitrates, I'm sure they won't mind switching over. And you might as well try to force their hands away from Micro$oft's Windows Media Player, if

i'm running a community-radio/ new-media project out of Barrie, Ontario/Canada . http://theDV8network.com ; free radio and fertile resistances, fresh from the Canadian underground . our listeners are not necessarily very technical . . but i've read Cathedral and the Bazaar , and of course i want to support ogg ( as an alternative media ). but i don't want to force my listeners into

I would appreciate some help with this. I read the GPL license and basically it says you can do whatever you want with the software (sell, modify) as long as you include the source code, the License and make any changes you make available in the same manner to all others. My questions is this: If I develop an external application (say a Call Center application or a GUI management application)

Behold, Adon Irani <adon@YorkU.CA> hath decreed: > > the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's > performance ? > _ is it not enough that OGG can have a streaming server that supports it ? Perhaps, if that is the only requirement to have a fully-functional streamer. Unfortunately, I believe this is not sufficient for the user base. So, if the

Oh I see thank you very much now I understand. So for me as I am considered an intermediate in R and also C++ what kind of programming language I could take up and learn to make a commercial statistical software ? Any advices as well ? > On 12 Jan 2018, at 12:40 PM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > Because many technical people need to accomplish statistical

I expect to release Ogg Frog 1.0 for public alpha test on Saturday, August 12. The date might slip a little depending on how my current job hunt goes; if I get a job sooner than I expect, I'll have to cut back on my development which has been full-time for a while now. The planned features are detailed at the page where the downloads will eventually be found:

I expect to release Ogg Frog 1.0 for public alpha test on Saturday, August 12. The date might slip a little depending on how my current job hunt goes; if I get a job sooner than I expect, I'll have to cut back on my development which has been full-time for a while now. The planned features are detailed at the page where the downloads will eventually be found:

Because many technical people need to accomplish statistical data analysis with computers that depend on existing algorithms applied in new ways, or with new algorithms that are not implemented by commercial software. Often such people have no desire to provide step-by-step support of their tools for every user of their code indefinitely, so developing commercial software for others is less

okay, im far from a pam expert, but i don't see any mention of winbind there? It's my weekend at the moment so i can't get to my test box at work to show you my pam module using winbind, but maybe you should check out this page on my website, it's using ldap try and use this and replace any mention of ldap with winbind http://www.yourhowto.org/content/view/35/9/ or i have a

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Dale Ghent wrote: > > Icecast2 is icecast2. I'm talking about it's lack of innovation (ogg > > streaming! woopdefuckingdoo) as well as it's lack of functionality that > > doesnt even near icecast 1.x (yp, acls, metadata, web-based admin). > > Apparently, you haven't tried Icecast2-alpha, yet. So... we have to try an

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > the current stable version. Those who are willing to give up the > > features not yet implemented in icecast2 in order to stream vorbis, can > > use the devel version. Those who don't need to stream vorbis can > > continue using the stable version. There is not a good rationality for > > Icecast2 is

We (the NLUUG) are organising a conference in Amsterdam this September. During this SANE conference we have reserved an evening for a Free Software Bazaar. We invite many people to participate in this gathering of Free and Open Source software groups. The name "Bazaar" obviously originates from Eric Raymond's article: A place where software developers gather. A unique opportunity

Hi there, i'm trying to get dovecot, procmail, postfix & SpamAssassin working together http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=441062 But i'm not having a lot of luck, a question about dovecot, what kind of mail box am i using? mbox? if so does anyone know if procmail can use mbox? /etc/dovecot.conf protocols = imap pop3 imap_listen = [::] pop3_listen = [::]