similar to: RSpec 0.9.1 released

Reid, I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !? Not sure but that would seem logical. Aaron

Hello, how can I execute some code after each step of a story. Is there some kind of listener documentated. Thank you in advance, Armin

We''d like to get some feedback on RSpec 0.9 before we start pushing out releases via Rubyforge''s gem server and update the website. We have therefore made the first beta of 0.9 available - both prepackaged and tagged in subversion (see below). RSpec 0.9 introduces a new API for expectations, which essentially means that your underscores go away (there has been other discussions

Now that we have the big Rails 2.0 release out the door, it''s a lot easier to push out smaller updates more frequently. So that''s what we''re going to do. Rails 2.0.2 contains a bunch of smaller fixes to various bugs, no show-stopping action, just further polish. But it also contains a few new defaults:

Hi: This command: svn co svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_9_0/rspec_on_rails/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rail Gives me this output: svn: URL ''svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_9_0/rspec_on_rails/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails'' doesn''t exist If I go the ''script/plugin install'' route, I get "Export complete." Anybody know

I am attending a training course covering rspec. I am using a MS WinXPpro SP3 machine. I have installed the cygwin environment. I am using git 1.5.4. I am using ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i386-mswin32] and rails 2.0.2 (albeit rails 2.1.0 is installed as well) I had to install rspec-rails and rspec via git and as a gem. Problem 1. If one goes to the rspec.info website and links

Dear Mysql & R users, first of all a big thanks to the authors of RMySQL. I got the following table; mysql> describe UserClick; +----------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+-------+---------------------------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | Privileges |

On 09/03/2016 10:56 AM, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > C will still need keys in order to establish metaconnections with A and B (as > well as a few other things). However there is no need for C to own any > "Subnets" at all. If somebody breaks into C, he could get access to the vpn network, right? Because the keys are there, it will be possible to use them to get access. Even if

On 09/02/2016 08:51 PM, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > What version of tinc are you using? tinc 1.1 already does what you want out of > the box: packets sent from node A to node B through node C will use a key that > A and B will negotiate between themselves. C doesn't have the key, and will > act as a blind relay. C will not be able to decipher the packets flowing > between A and B.

Hello All, Has anyone configured bri to answer for only one msn? In essence, when the primary is busy I want to have channel 2 ring. I am using an eicon diva server bri I know I saw it in the windows interface, but don't see it in the linux setup. Regards, Greg

Hi Armin, Argument parsing isn't handled by the JIT. This sounds like you're making redundant calls to cl::ParseCommandLineOptions ? Deleting the ExecutionEngine and any RTDyldMemoryManager instances that you've created should be enough to reset the JIT. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Armin Steinhoff <armin at steinhoff.de> wrote: > > Hi, > >

Hi all, I would like to announce the first release of the chan_capi channel driver on sourceforge.net The package is available for download with name chan_capi-cm-0.5 and is the current CVS HEAD. It is derived from the chan_capi-0.4.0PRE1 of kapejod. The main changes are: - complete rework - fix race-conditions - fix call state handling - rework of debug/verbose messages - added capiFax

Hi, I made an interesting observation using webservers (not just mongrel) under red hat enterprise linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 5). Maybe this is helpful or somebody with deeper networking expertise can comment on this. Once client said that 1-2% of the response of our server were unacceptably slow (really huge 3s-21s). So I did more ab and httperf tests and notice that very few

Hi all: I am trying to do PCA on the following matrix. N1 N2 A1 A2 B1 B2 gene_a 90 110 190 210 290 310 gene_b 190 210 390 410 590 610 gene_c 90 110 110 90 120 80 gene_d 200 100 400 90 600 200 >dataf<-read.table("matrix") >

Hi all, are there any plans to correct/implement the "getPointerToGlobal()" method for accessing global variables that are emitted by MCJIT? (see for details the unit test of MCJIT) Best Regards Armin

Hi all, it took a while, but on sourceforge.net I added the new release 0.6 of chan_capi-cm driver. Note: dial string and capi.conf has changed. The main changes are: - added 'relaxdtmf'. - more BSD compatibility - correct PROGRESS handling - added verbose text for capi info/reason error messages. - use correct facility-selector for echo-cancel - added application capicommand() for CAPI

Hello all, as written in my other posts, I have a setup of about seven hosts. Two of them (A and B) use StrictSubnets and an own routing via a special host (C), because C has better connection to the A and B than a direct A-B connection. Host C is in a place where I need to create special security settings. The VPN encrypted data shall not be available on host C. There is no need for host C be

Hello, sorry for beeing off-topic here. But can anyone confirm that there is a problem reverse resolving lists.digium.com (216.207.245.17) ? Because of this problem, my mail server will not accept mails from lists.digium.com (it is configured to accept valid DNS only). Armin

Hi people, Version of my beloved Dovecot installation: 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) I moved from a OS X server to a Linux (Ubuntu) Headless server. All fun and good to play around with. Love almost everything. In the combination with Postfix and Dovecot I?m stuck to despair into oblivion. Everything works except I cannot send mail from my (OS X) Outlook client I keep getting: Connection to the

On 30.08.2016 17:37, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:38:16PM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. >> Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection >> between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we >> have packet loss between those direct connections.