similar to: Zapateller not playing audio via SIP Trunk?

Hi Gang To increase security against phished passwords and similar attacks, we consider offering customers to define IP ranges (or GeoIP locations) from which their dynamic registrations are being accepted. I can already look at the source IP in the dial plan, so no issue with validate an INVITE against a source IP. But I would also like to prevent registrations from outside of this

I am having issues with Privacy Manager and Zapateller. If I set callerid="" on a sip user zapateller sends the tones If I set callerid="Anonymous" <8475551212> zapateller doesn't send the tones If I call from a phone after dialing *67 zapateller doesn't send the tones In the last 2 cases, the display on the phone shows -Blocked Call- PrivacyManager always gives

Hello List Asterisk 13.14.1 in use with pjsip stack. On the remote side is a SBC which performs some 'nat' detection. I suppose this means the SBC listens from where it is getting RTP data and then replies to that ip. As long as the asterisk is initiating the call this is fine, the asterisk start sending RTP to the media IP of the SBC and the SBC is sending media back. Now I want to do

Dear fellow list readers This is the situation: ISDN Devices => Patton ISDN to SIP GW => Asterisk PJSIP The Patton GW resides on a dynamic IP address, so I cannot really use match=ip in the identify section. The Patton does not send a line parameter. The ISDN Devices behind the patton have different MSN and should be able to send them in the From: Header, so the default endpoint

Hi Gang Server, two interfaces, routing to two different networks. Two transports defined, each bound to the corresponding ip assigned to the interface. But still, especially when an 183 message is sent, the Contact header does contain the wrong IP Address. Is this a known issue 13.18.3? Or is there a way to make absolutely sure the IP addresses within the Contact header is corresponding to

Been tinkering and found Zapateller appears to be answering when I didn't expect it to. I have something like so: [incoming] exten => s,1,NoOp ;Zapateller(answer|nocallerid) exten => s,2,PrivacyManager exten => s,3,Dial(${RING},20) ... I have a 1x1 analog * installation with a couple IP phones too. I've got the FXO interface connected to the home phone line. When I get an

Hi Joshua Thank you for your reply. Indeed, Ubuntu only ships with this old version. Upgraded to 16.2. via PPA. Problem persisted. Well, I already mentioned that this is a machine with two physical interfaces with different routes which on the 'external' side handles SIP customer registrations and has an 'internal' IC Trunk to a commercial Voice Switch via private IP Range. I

Does anybody know why I get this error when using zapateller: WARNING[1209214400]: File rtp.c, Line 327 (ast_rtcp_read): RTP Read error: Resource temporarily unavailable It's scrolls until a sound is recived from the line, then it plays the zapateller tones. /Mike

Hi all I noticed that most caller are quite confused by the standard voicemail announcement text. Especialy as the number read is the 'internal' number. Callers often hang up because they think having called the wrong number when they hear the announcement. Is there a way (like in many other PBXes) that the VoiceMail user could record his own announcement? (like, hello, this is the

Hi Joshua I had a shot at your suggestion, bug still no success. I fear the 181 is sent before the macro is called. I want to change the Diversion Header in the 181 message sent back to the caller to put the number it contains in the correct e164 format (stripping the 0 and adding +41 for Switzerland) but just any 'dialplan set' value would do for an example :-) Could you please make

Hi Richard > That could be possible and would be a bug in chan_sip. Ok, so I switched to PJSIP to see if this behaves differently So ip do a Transfer(PJSIP/${DESTNUMBER}@trunk) And this results in: Failed to parse destination URI '[destnumber scrubber]' for channel PJSIP/trunk-00000011 Do I have to specify the destination number differently when using Transfer with pjsip that I

Hi Joshua > The "rtp_keepalive" option can be used to have the RTP stack send an > RTP packet out. Try that and see what happens. Once again 'bullseye' that fixed the problem. Thank you! Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen -Beno?t Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29

Hi Well it is well some time that my last DUNDI peer has become unreachable. I guess too many issues with spoofed numbers etc. But I am wondering, do people, especially larger entities like telcos, still use DUNDI? I know that in some Hamradio communities, DUNDI is used to interconnect PBXes, but that is with private phone number ranges, not connected to the public. Want some DUNDI peering?

Hi All, In theory if I do this; exten => s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid) exten => s,2,Privacymanager exten => s,3,Dial(a bunch of SIP extensions) My callers should only hear the anti-telemarketing tones if they call from a line that has no caller*ID and then get offered an opportunity to enter it, right? What I'm finding is that in the event of no CID the caller gets dumped into the

Hello List I work at an SIP Provider and we have added and SBC in front of our Voice Switch to protect it. This requires all our SIP Trunk customers to register via a 'proxy'. I struggle with Asterisk to work over a proxy. This is what I have done so far. register => username at sip.example.com:password at sbc.example.com This works fine, asterisk is sending registrations via the

Hi, I have been using Zapateller with a TDM400 no problems at all, but recently I have ported our BT number to a VoIP provider, and have a strange problem. When I phone our number I first get the BT unavailable three tone sound, and then it actually connects the call via IAX2. So, I disabled zapateller in the dialplan and tried again. Would you believe it worked fine. Has anybody else come

Hi Gang I gave up on running asterisk with two interfaces without it mixing up the ip addresses. So I have removed one transport definition from pjsip.conf Now * keeps complaining: res_pjsip.c:3461 ast_sip_set_tpselector_from_transport_name: Unable to retrieve PJSIP transport 'transport-name' I did a grep on /etc/asterisk for that transport name. It's in any file anymore.

Hi all I have a problem that starts driving me crazy... Win2k3 ADS, added some attributes like loginshell, gid, uid etc. Unix clients use NSS_LDAP to get 'passwd' data and kerberos to authenticate users. Authentication does not happen via LDAP. winbindd is used to autocreate sid => uid/gid mappings. This worked very fine with samba 3.0.14a. Upgraded to samba 3.0.23 Now the owner

Hi List Implementing screening and routing I have stumbled over this issue: [pbx-router] exten => s,1,NoOp(ROUTER FROM: ${CALLERID(Number)} TO: ${DESTINATION}) same => n,Set(SOURCE=${CHANNEL(name)}) same => n,Set(PAI=${PJSIP_HEADER(read,P-Asserted-Identity)}) same => n,Set(FROM=${CALLERID(Number)}) same => n,Set(TO=${DESTINATION}) same

Dear List I fear I stumbled over a bug in asterisk 13.14.1. My 'phones' are roaming around, sometimes some are connecting from ipv6 enabled networks, another time they are not. If a connection is ipv6 I would prefer to use ipv6 to avoid ipv4-nat problems. I have not specified a transport in the endpoint section, so that the appropriate transport which corresponds to the registration