similar to: VoIP over Alvarion Wireless

Hi list, I have a problem I thought was simple first, but now I''m stuck. In a nutshell, it''s about redundant uplinks at an outside location. Crude ASCII-Art follows: Internet | | +------------+ | cisco with | | uplinks | +------------+ | | ATM interface +----------+ ... | alvarion | | | wireless

All of a sudden tonight my web browsing and ssh performance is terrible. I''m on a cable connection and I''m wondering if it could be due to evening bandwidth contention or ISP throttling. If so, I suppose tcdevices numbers are out the window. Can anything be done? - Grant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is

Just for the record and to possibly help with others who get BudgeTone phones. My asterisk box is behind NAT, and I use Vonage, NuFone, and iconnecthere for my "POTS backhaul." On the front end I have an ATA186, a Digium TDM20, and now a BudgeTone 102. The BudgeTone definitely has issues wrt the RTP stream and NATting, although unfortunately I haven't yet been able to dig

>It will be about 100 phones at about 20 locations all within >about 4 miles of each other. Perhaps a more pressing question might be how you are going to backhaul Ethernet in a 4-mile radius. You can't run a Cat 5 cable more than 100 metres reliably, and using Ethernet repeaters every hundred metres or so isn't practical. You will need a fiber backbone or something like that. What

We are an asterisk user... small time system 50-100 users or so. But, we have an opportunity to get into a big time telecom activity. It would have 2000 to 30,000 user lines per city, and we would like to have those brought back to a central location for control and because transport can be more economical than remote site rentals, maintenance and personnel. We could take the local lines into

After purchasing the Uniden TRU9480 and then the Panansonic 5672, both of which do not have "phone company" compatible FSK/stutter MWI, I finally got smart and found out just which Panasonic phones have this feature. Only the following 5.8G models in their current line have FXO compatible MWI. I purchased the 5771 unit and one remote. I have confimed it does in fact work with Asterisk

I am experiencing a situation where I am getting intermittent choppy audio. Here is the network layout: Termination provider -> IAX2 over the Internet -> 20Mb fiber connection -> router -> Asterisk My ATA connection goes into the router between the fiber and the Asterisk server on another interface here is the layout from me to Asterisk: Sipura ATA (SPA1001 running

Hello All, I have a request from a prospectieve client to deploy a PBX capacity that can do up to 3000+ lines within a geographic region similar to a campus. The client wants analog lines for extensions and maybe VoIP for some backhaul traffic while the other traffic would be carrid via E1 channels. The client has other proposals to buy a mid, range telco switch from alcatel or simens but i am

Hi, Thanks for your reply . I am attaching the files needed by you herewith. The NAT device is called Pronto gateway which has two interfaces , namely eth0 and eth1. ''eth0'' has an ip address of 203.124.152.66 and eth1 has an ip address of 192.168.1.3 . All the client PCs are in 192.168.1.0 network [behind the NAT, the Pronto gateway] and use 192.168.1.3 as the default

We are running Arch Linux as a new sever and only has samba4 available officially I am trying to migrate my samba 3 config to work with samba 4 I currently use samba to authenticate windows users to use our Linux shares. Then using the Unix groups setup in NIS to validate the users access to a particular share. Here is the problem. I can see the shares using samba 4 but it uses the

I'm looking at setting up Asterisk for a completely IP environment. All intercompany calls. I work for a ski area. I currently use a 3Com Superstack for in our office. And an old small town phone system for up at the mountain. The phone system is dying and I'm hoping to bring IP to replace the old phones. It will be about 100 phones at about 20 locations all within about 4 miles of each

Are there an IOS interface for Asterisk?, or an IOS to SIP converter? Some femtocells uses this protocol and I would to use them with Asterisk. Jorge Mendoza

Hello Everyone, We are currently having talks with various service providers, and trying to determine what the best way is to interconnect in order to have access to the PSTN network. As you know there are two ways of doing this: Traditional PRI: Have trunks grouped into a transport layer such as OC3/12. With DIDs attached to the group. As you many know, this approach would also require a POP

It's really pretty simple. You can download the code and build it all you want... ...for yourself. It cannot be distributed, sold, or used commercially in any way. That's all. /g. -----Original Message----- From: Icecast [mailto:icecast-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jeffares Sent: Tuesday, 16 May, 2017 17:03 To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Icecast] Frauenhofer signing

Hello. I would like to know if somebody did a wireles voip with Asterisk PBX. I think to deploy a wireless for about 500 potential customers, it's a 3 km radius maximum coverage with houses without phone lines, I work for public places telephony small enterprises ( a common bussines in Spain) so I can get good rates from 4 telcos and do LCR at my asterisk PBX. Is anybody did this before

Is anyone in the world making gsm 'picocells' which could be connected to an Asterisk server and allow gsm mobiles to roam to them (and therefore become just another extension) when in the office? Obviously lots of things to consider (it's a licensed band) which I think was the big holdup last time I asked this question anywhere. I know there was talk about using them on aircraft

We are currently moving away from a wide-spread Cisco CallManager deployment to Asterisk. For many of our small sites we have the routers configured for what Cisco calls SRST so if we have a WAN failure, the router acts as a SCCP registrar. We are converting to SIP, and from what I can tell Cisco wants a license for each router to run SRST over SIP... So my question to the group is: What are

Hello, I am creating a configuration where a Redhat server running bridge-tools 0.9.5 will be bridging between different VLANs on the same physical interface (for example: a bridge consisting of eth1.100 and eth1.110). This physical interface is being connected to modern Cisco switches running PVST+. The Cisco switch does not like this configuration as the tags on its BPDUs are being changed

First: I am not a lawyer, this is no legal advice! On 16 May 2017, at 0:25, Robert Jeffares wrote: > Jack, > > I am using AAC+ encoded by Darkice and distributed on Icecast2 on a > Ubuntu server. I had to install a number of open source libraries and > compile darkice from source. No licence. This sounds like it would violate the license, given that the FAQ on

I am having problems using rsync on cygwin to properly copy the ownership of files from windows to windows. I am running: rsync -avPA //src_addr/some/path /local/dst/path/ Based on: http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg18920.html and: http://www.nabble.com/Re:-I-need-rsync-+-acl-support-for-windows--t2462647.html ENV: CYGWIN=ntsec tty I am running this on Windows Server 2003 R2