similar to: Can I stub a method on a belongs_to association:

What is the correct way to mock out the errors on a Rails model? I''m assuming i need to say @mock_thing = mock_model(Thing) @mock_thing_errors = mock("errors") @mock_thing_errors.should_receive(:full_messages).and_return("An error") @mock_thing.should_receive(:errors).and_return(@mock_thing_errors) Just wanted to check the best practice on this kind of thing and how

I''ve encountered what seems like an odd omission in the behaviour of belongs_to associations: if you assign to the foreign key attribute, it doesn''t update the associated object (or mark a previously loaded one as stale) until you explicitly save or reload it. Let''s say we have a Company model, which belongs_to :city : >> torchbox =

Any ideas how I would go about writing specs for views which make use of content_for? I''d like, for example, to be able to specify that ABC view places XYZ in the sidebar, which I do using content_for(:sidebar). Am I missing something obvious? Kyle

I've been looking for a good iax or sip <==> ptsn provider. Someone with very low cost usa calling and can offer incoming ptsn connections in most markets. The only decent providers I could find were iconnecthere and nufone. Has anyone found someone that really stood out? Matt Hohman New Heights Church http://www.newheights.org 7913 NE 58th Ave. Vancouver, WA 98665 Office:

Hi dear R-listers, I'm trying to fit a 3-level model using lme in R. My sample size is about 2965 and 3 factors: year (5 levels), ssize (4 levels), condition (2 levels). When I issue the following command: > lme(var~year*ssize*condition,random=~ssize+condition|subject,data=smp,method ="ML") I got the following error: Error in logLik.lmeStructInt(lmeSt, lmePars) :

Hello everyone: I'm a new member of this group. I have a question about "oneway.test". When I use "anova(lm(....))" to analysis the ANOVA, I can get the information about Sum Sq and Mean Sq. (The R code and the results are as follows.)

Dear R-helpers, I am developing a Mixed-Effects model for a study of immunoassays using 'lme4' library. The study design is as follows: 10 samples were run using 7 different immunoassays, 3 times each, in duplicates. Data attached. I have developed the following model: c.lme <- lmer(Result~SPL + (SPL|Assay/Run) -1, data=data) This model has excellent predictions - the Rsquared of

Hi I am attempting Anova analysis to compare results from four groups (Samp1-4) which are lists of intensities from the experiment. I am doing this by first creating a structured list of the data and then conducting the ANOVA (Script provided below). Im an R beginner so am not sure if I am using this correctly. Two major questions I have are: 1) Is using the code (zzz.aov <- aov(Intensity ~

Hi, this should be an easy one, but I can't figure it out. I have a vector of tests, with their units between brackets (if they have units). eg tests <- c("pH", "Assay (%)", "Impurity A(%)", "content (mg/ml)") Now I would like to hava a function where I use a test as input, and which returns the units like: f <- function (x) sub("\\)",

Using a "by() statement, I am preparing ANOVA's for multiple experiments, and using simint() to generate confidence intervals. This works fine. simint.by.fit <- by(analytes.dfr, list(Assay = analytes.dfr$analyte ), function(data) (simint(value ~ tx, data = data,type='Tukey' ) ) ) I can separately prepare plots of the confidence intervals, and I can prepare separate plots

Try this data(Assay) as1 <- lme(logDens~sample*dilut, data=Assay, random=pdBlocked(list( pdIdent(~1), pdIdent(~sample-1), pdIdent(~dilut-1)))) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) I'm

Hi, I need to construct a formula programaticly, and pass it to a function such as the linear mixed model lme. The help says it requires "a two-sided linear formula object describing the fixed-effects part of the model" but I do not know how to create this formula. I have tried various things using formula(x, ...), as.formula(object, env = parent.frame()) and as.Formula(x, ...)

#If I have two lists as follows a1<- array(1:6, dim=c(2,3)) a2<- array(7:12, dim=c(2,3)) l1<- list(a1,a2) a3<- array(1:4, dim=c(2,2)) a4<- array(5:8, dim=c(2,2)) l2<- list(a3,a4) #how can I create a new list with the mean across all arrays within the list, so all components are included? As an example for [[1]]; cbind((l1[[1]][,1]+l2[[1]][,1])/2,

Hello all: I am interested in computing what the multilevel modeling literature calls a multiple membership model. More specifically, I am working with a data set involving clients and providers. The clients are the lower-level units who are nested within providers (higher-level). However, this is not nesting in the usual sense, as clients can belong to multple providers, which I understand

Greetings ~ I need some assistance determining an appropriate approach to analyzing multivariate binary response data, and how to do it in R. The setting: Data from an assay, wherein 6-hours-post-fertilization zebrafish embryos (n=20, say) are exposed in a vial to a chemical (replicated 3 times, say), and 5 days later observed for the presence/absence (1/0) of defects in several organ systems

Hi. I have data which i would want to assess the degree of agreement between two assays, e.g., to evaluate reproducibility or for inter-rater reliability. I have used the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It looks good ranginging between 0.90 to 0.998. Though this looks good. I am told the Concordance correlation coefficient will give a better picture of how reproducible the assay

Hi,

Hello, In my code I found something that looks like an anomaly, I found a reproducible example in which I am just trying to compare each row in a data frame against the first row: a<-data.frame(row=c("B","C","B"),column=c(2,2,10),assay=c("Assay1","Assay1","Assay1"),plate=c(1,1,1),stringsAsFactors=FALSE) apply(a[1:2,],1,function(x) {

Is there a good way in R to impute values which exist, but are less than the detection level for an assay? Thanks, Jonathan Williams OPTIMA Radcliffe Infirmary Woodstock Road OXFORD OX2 6HE Tel +1865 (2)24356

Hi: I have data from an assay in the form of two vectors, one is response and the other is a predictor. When I attempt to fit a 5 parameter logistic model with "nls", I get converged parameter estimates. I also get the same answers with "gnls" without specifying the "weights" argument. However, when I attempt to use the "gnls" function and try to