similar to: S110M (FXS) Modules no longer seen on TDM400P

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "S110M (FXS) Modules no longer seen on TDM400P"

2007 Jan 15
0
S400M (FXS) Modules no longer seen
Hi, I have a TDM21B (A new TDM20B that just arrived plus a X400M that I already had). This card sometimes works, and sometimes only the FXO module is seen. By "works", I mean all 3 modules have the green lights on the ports on and when zaptel is loaded the log shows: Freshmaker version: 73 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Module
2006 Mar 10
1
Yet again: chan_zap.c: Unable to specify channel 4: No such device
I have seen this in the archives any number of times -- but I have yet to find a solution that works for me. Any suggestions you can offer would be most appreciated. Here are the answers to the questions I have seen asked in earlier posts. The log contains: Mar 10 12:26:29 WARNING[3015] chan_zap.c: Unable to specify channel 4: No such device Mar 10 12:26:29 ERROR[3015] chan_zap.c: Unable
2005 Apr 11
0
plotting Principle components vs individual variables.
Dear R, I'm trying to plot the first principle component of an analysis vs the first variable but am having trouble. I have no trouble doing the initial plot but have difficulty thereafter. First I want to highlight some points of the following data set list(running) [[1]] X100m X200m X400m X800m X1500m X5K X10K Marathon Argentina 10.39 20.81 46.84 1.81
2005 Apr 11
1
plotting Principal components vs individual variables.
At the cost of breaking the thread I'm going to change your subject and replace 'Principle' by 'Principal'. I just can't stand it any longer... OK, here is how I would solve your other problems. First put > wh <- c("USA", "New Zealand", "Dominican Republic", "Western Samoa", "Cook Islands") > ind
2005 Apr 05
2
Principle Component Analysis in R
Dear R Should I be concerned if the loadings to a Principle Component Analysis are as follows: Loadings: Comp.1 Comp.2 Comp.3 Comp.4 X100m -0.500 0.558 0.661 X200m -0.508 0.379 0.362 -0.683 X400m -0.505 -0.274 -0.794 -0.197 X800m -0.486 -0.686 0.486 0.239 Comp.1 Comp.2 Comp.3 Comp.4 SS loadings 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Proportion Var 0.25 0.25 0.25
2006 Mar 13
1
Cannot load wcfxo -- Please help!
I'm afraid that I am at a loss here. I am new to Asterisk, and have successfully set up SIP. But I cannot get my FXS card working, and I'm not sure what else I can try. # modprobe wcfxo /lib/modules/2.4.21-37.0.1.ELsmp/misc/wcfxo.o: init_module: No such device Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may
2006 Dec 15
0
Zaptel 1.4.0-beta3 Released
The Asterisk Development Team is pleased to announce the release of Zaptel 1.4.0-beta3. This release contains a number of updates: - compatibility with Linux kernel 2.6.19 - bug fixes to the Xorcom Astribank driver (XPP) - support for Digium's TE110P Rev C, VPMOCT064 and new revisions of the S110M and S400M FXS modules - various other bug fixes Thanks for supporting Asterisk and Zaptel!
2006 Dec 15
0
Zaptel 1.4.0-beta3 Released
The Asterisk Development Team is pleased to announce the release of Zaptel 1.4.0-beta3. This release contains a number of updates: - compatibility with Linux kernel 2.6.19 - bug fixes to the Xorcom Astribank driver (XPP) - support for Digium's TE110P Rev C, VPMOCT064 and new revisions of the S110M and S400M FXS modules - various other bug fixes Thanks for supporting Asterisk and Zaptel!
2005 Sep 02
0
TDM400 w/ FXS S110M pinout on RJ11 connector?
Hi all, I just got my long awaited FXS modules for a TDM400 card, and was a bit puzzled about how my phones and the FXS interface worked together. Here goes: In Sweden (that's where I am located) phones traditionally are connected in daisy chain configuration. This means that a phone in on-hook condition passes the line through back onto the outer pair of the RJ11, back into the wall
2010 Nov 16
1
S110M not working
Hi All - I pulled from a working system a TDM400 with one s110 fxs and three x100 fxos. I put it into a new box and the fxs no longer works. The fxos work just fine. I thought it was odd, but I chalked it up to a random chance failure and ordered another s110. The replacement doesn't work either, and now I'm confused. dahdi_scan recognizes the s110, but it says it fails. Output
2007 Jan 27
1
FXS - Init Indirect Registers UNSUCCESSFULLY.
I'm having problems with a TDM22B. The FXO modules work fine. Both FXS modules fail to initialized. The error messages I see when the module loads: Init Indirect Registers UNSUCCESSFULLY. Indirect Registers failed verification. I already RMA'ed a TDM22B because of this problem. Now that the replacement shows a similar issue, I want to see if anyone else can think of something to
2006 May 18
0
tdm21B in china
<P><BR>Hello Gentelmen,</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>I am in china, just ordered&nbsp;a tdm21B card (2 fxs and 1 fxo), still waiting for its delivery.</P> <P>&nbsp;Whether anybody already tried this kind of card&nbsp; here in china,&nbsp; will you please tell me how it works, any issue?</P> <P>esp.</P>
2004 Oct 01
1
Re: Problem with TDM400P
Greetings all, I'm new to asterisk... Finally got two IP phones and two TDM400P's (one with four FXO modules and one with four FXS modules)... Began experimenting a couple days ago and have ran into a very aggrevating problem. My system consists of the following hardware: Abit BL7-RAID motherboard Pentium 4 1.6GHz processor 512MB SDRAM 2 TDM400P cards 2 3Com 3c905
2005 Aug 01
2
TDM400P REV I issues - ProSLIC vs TDM400P
The REV I card shows up in the PCI table as: 02:05.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Intel 537 (or 02:05.0 Class 0280: e159:0001) Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 But the REV E/F shows up as: 02:0d.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface (or 02:0d.0 Class 0780: e159:0001) Subsystem: Unknown device b100:0003 One
2006 May 09
2
Problems with TDM400P and FXO modules
Hi , I have an asterix (1.2.7.1) box with 3 TDM400P and 10 FXO modules, and zaptel (1.2.5). The problem is that 6 modules can't be initaized and i get the folowing error: May 7 09:17:37 WARNING[7739] chan_zap.c: Unable to specify channel 9: No such device May 7 09:17:37 ERROR[7739] chan_zap.c: Unable to open channel 9: No such device here = 0, tmp->channel = 9, channel = 9 ztcfg output
2006 May 16
6
Netherlands zaptel.conf
Hello, I have configured my TDM01B Card (1 FXO Port ) as follows (below) but it will not pick up an incoming call. Any suggestions/tools to see what the problem is? I have looked at zttool where this line changes but I don't understand what it means (The last digit changed from 0 to 1) Total/Conf/Act: 4/ 1/ 1 /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=4 loadzone=nl defaultzone=nl
2004 Jun 01
2
problems with TDM400P
Hi, We have two of these 4 port FXO cards. However, we are having some problems with incoming/outgoing calls. The latest version of Asterisk/zaptel from CVS is being used. Voicemail, internal SIP <-> SIP calls between Pingtel xpressa hard phones work terrific, echotest is fine, and so on. The zaptel and wcfxs modules load fine, and show all 8 FXO interfaces in dmesg:
2007 Mar 12
2
New to Asterisk
Hi everyone, I'm completely new to Asterisk and before I buy any card, I would like to ask for some information. 1. We'll be using analog PSTN phone lines. Is there anything that I should ask the telecom company before I buy the card? What I mean is whether the card will be compatible with the line? 2. What about the hardware on the PC? I will be using at least a Pentium 3 with a 600 or
2008 Jan 21
1
FXS damaged at TDM22B
Hi All; If one of my FXS port damaged at TDM22B because we connected the Telephone Line cable to the FXS port while it should be connected to the FXO port, then can I order S110M FXS Module and fix it instead of the damaged FXS? (This if we assume my problem that really the FXS port damaged). Rregards Bilal
2006 Mar 14
1
Bad FXS Module?
I apparently have a dead FXS module. Is there any kind of test I can run on it (on a live system) to determine if its good or bad? The telephone has no dialtone, gets no calls. It has been working for several months, and just quit yesterday. Thanks! Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (4 modules) Freshmaker version: 73 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0: Installed -- AUTO