similar to: NET 1.1 framework

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "NET 1.1 framework"

2004 Mar 26
3
Samba 3.0 & 2003 Active Directory Native Mode
Does Samba 3.0.2a release integrate with Windows Active Directory running in 2003 Native Mode? The situation is that two corporate departments are joining their network infrastructure. One department runs several Samba 2.2 servers and the other is a 2003 Native Mode Active Directory. I understand that if you upgrade to Samba 3.0 this supports Windows 2000 AD, but it is unclear to me if
2009 Apr 16
6
Using Paperclip::Processor and RMagick to sharpen my thumbnails
Hi, I''m brand new to RMagick (and pretty new to Rails for that matter!). Right now, site owners are allowed to upload product and ingredient photos to the website. Everything works great, ingredients are sized down and proportioned correctly...the problem is that the resulting images are so blurry! So I''ve been doing some research and it looks like Paperclip::Processor may be the
2006 Feb 20
2
Write pure sine to *.ogg directly?
Hello, I am author of a Morse code training software written in Perl at http://starling.ws/morse Currently I output to *.wav and, if on Unix, convert to *.ogg. And that's okay for a trainer. But I have desire to upgrade the project to a real-time communication tool...or at least a Morse code audio mail routine. And I should like to avoid *.wav. I'd like some means of writing a pure
2020 Jan 10
2
DW_OP_implicit_pointer design/implementation in general
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:02 AM Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:38 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > As far as LLVM semantics are concerned, the implicit pointer doesn't > seem to be that much different from any other implicit values (such as > constants) to me. Why do you think that it
2020 Jan 08
2
DW_OP_implicit_pointer design/implementation in general
> On Jan 2, 2020, at 6:37 AM, Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On the topic of intrinsics, right now we have two (dbg.value / > dbg.addr) that respectively describe: > * The "direct value" (quoting langref) of a variable, and > * The address of where the current variable value is stored. > Both of which map onto dwarf
2009 Apr 23
3
Floating simulation error
Hi all, I am running a simulation and a curious error keeps coming up that stops the whole process. The error is a subscript out of bounds error, and it seems to happen at different points (floating around) throughout the looping simulation. Say, for example, it crashes on sample 1 - iteration 200. I can force it to start again on iteration 202 with all of the same settings, and it is
2020 Jan 13
2
DW_OP_implicit_pointer design/implementation in general
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:20 AM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 2020, at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:02 AM Jeremy Morse < > jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:38 PM
2010 Nov 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Inliner
Xinliang David Li wrote: > Hi, I browsed the LLVM inliner implementation, and it seems there is > room for improvement. (I have not read it too carefully, so correct me > if what I observed is wrong). > > First the good side of the inliner -- the function level summary and > inline cost estimation is more elaborate and complete than gcc. For > instance, it considers callsite
2020 Jan 14
2
DW_OP_implicit_pointer design/implementation in general
Hi, Let me consolidate what we discussed with my opinion. * On the point of new intrinsic llvm.dbg.derefval: It (new intrinsic) was more a neater way than a needed way. The whole functionality can go ahead without it and using llvm.dbg.value instead. Though I liked it (new intrinsic), since most of us are against it, it should be fine for me to drop it. This is because the transformation was
2019 Nov 19
2
DW_OP_implicit_pointer design/implementation in general
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:33 AM, Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi llvm-dev@, > > Switching focus to the LLVM implementation, the significant change is > using dbg.value's first operand to refer to a DILocalVariable, rather > than a Value. There's some impedance mismatch here, because all the > documentation (for example in the
2005 Jul 15
2
How to 'read' ztmonitor and set gains
Being one the many people trying to track down echo 'ghosts' I ran across this page: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-November/071301.html suggesting ways to adjust the gain. I have a TDM400P 2x2 config with Kewlstart lines configured. I've located a local telco milliwatt test line, and when I call it, the gain numbers are no where near 14844. Now, this
2019 Nov 28
2
DW_OP_implicit_pointer design/implementation in general
Hi folks, I am pushing a PoC patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D70833 for review which includes the case when temporary is promoted. For such cases it generates IR as call void @llvm.dbg.derefval(metadata i32 3, metadata !25, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_explicit_pointer, DW_OP_LLVM_arg0)), !dbg !32 And llvm-darfdump output looks like ------------- 0x0000007b:
2003 Dec 19
9
virtual disk/block-device problem
I am trying to write a script to handle setup of domains using virtual block devices for their root FS and have been unable to get the virtual devices to work with any sort of consistency. This is using xen-1.1.bk on Redhat 7.3 (I had to rebuild all the tool binaries to run on 7.3). Anyway, I would first like to make sure I am using the vd/vbd stuff correctly. Here is an example of the problem I
2020 Sep 01
2
[RFC] [DebugInfo] Using DW_OP_entry_value within LLVM IR
Hi David, Thanks for your comments! I just want to add that I think it would neat if the entry values could map into multi-location dbg.values and DBG_VALUEs that are being proposed on this list. For example, if we have: int local = param1 + param2 + 123; I think it would be good if we would be able to to represent the four different permutations of the values of the parameters being
2019 Nov 20
4
LNT debuginfo-statistics not running?
The debug info statistics bot is triggered by this job: http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/ which unfortunately hasn't been green in a very long time (>1mo). Alex/Azhar, do you know what's blocking that job? -- adrian > On Nov 20, 2019, at 9:46 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +usual debug info folks (but I think in this case
2009 Apr 28
1
latticeExtra: useOuterStrips and axis.line$lwd
Hi, I'm working on some lattice wireframe figures that have two conditioning factors, and I want the strips labelled on the top and left of the entire plot, rather than above each individual panel. useOuterStrips() does this, but it draws internal axis lines, even after I explicitly set axis.line to 0. Is there a way to use useOuterStrips but without axis boxes? I've included a short
2008 Jan 21
4
Large issue - having trouble diagnosing.
Hello, I am having a lot of trouble with my deployment of Asterisk. I am running the PBX-In-a-flash turnkey of Asterisk and ever since deployment I have had many different problems. I have managed to get all issues sorted out as I go along, until this one that randomly began last week. We are using Grandstream GXP 2000 Handsets in the office, and at TE110P card to interface to our ISDN OnRamp10
2020 Feb 12
2
Why is lldb telling me "variable not available"?
Apologies for the slow response here Jeremy. Your reply has been incredibly helpful so far, I just need to try adding 'llvm.dbg.addr' myself to confirm that works. Thank you! - Brian Gesiak On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for working on coroutines, the debugging experience, and in > particular
2007 Nov 24
1
[LLVMdev] newbie question (link error)
Hey folks, sorry for the incredibly basic question but I'm stuck in the tutorial with link errors. I'm getting them both on cygwin (gcc 3.4.4) and linux (gcc 4.1.3). If I enter the tutorial pretty much verbatim, it compiles fine, but I get tons of link errors if I attempt to link with arguments provided by running llvm-config with 'core'. If I run llvm-config with 'all'
2008 Nov 22
1
Upgrade 1.4.19 to 1.6 => segementation fault
During compiling I have not seen an error, however, when I start asterisk again it ends with: app_morsecode.so => (Morse code) == Registered custom function 'SYSINFO' func_sysinfo.so => (System information related functions) Segmentation fault (core dumped) How can I figure out what is wrong? bye Ronald