similar to: integrating with Asterisk and OpenSER for Voicemail

While reading about how to maximize capabilities in asterisk i have read about SER and OpenSER. The sites do not explain to newbies (maybe that's on purpose) what are the benefits of using those products tied with asterisk (or is SER an asterisk replacement??) Can someone give me an idea of what's the usage for open(ser) and asterisk? is it for scalability? should I run it in the same

Hi all, Hope somebody can help-I really am stumped as to why this won't work. I realise that this isnt an Asterisk problem (Please dont bash me on the list) and I have emailed the SER list but I havent received a reply and maybe someone on this list can help...Once this problem is solved I am going to use Asterisk for voicemail etc with SER (I have it set up) I currently have SER set up and

I'm implementing a SBC with my Asterisk PBX but the keeps disabling the trunk group I've configured and I think it may be because Asterisk is returning a 4r04 to the OPTIONS. I've created a test context and have put in a wildcard pattern match to try and catch those options but it doesn't seem to work. Is there a way to have asterisk respond with an 200 OK instead of a 404? --

I've got this setup in a test context. [test] exten => s,hint,SIP/7124 exten => s,1,NoOP(Options to $EXTEN) same => n,Hangup() exten => _x.,hint,SIP/7124 exten => _X.,1,NoOP(Options to $EXTEN) same => n,Hangup() exten => Anonymous,hint,SIP/7124 exten => Anonymous,1,NoOP(Options to $EXTEN) same => n,Hangup() I added hints to see if that would make a difference

Hello Users......... I'm Now doing on Asterisk Manager for My knowledge Growth, Can anybody explan me on Asterisk Manager settings....... in manager.conf [general] enabled =yes port = 5038 bindaddr = 192.168.2.75 displayconnects = yes [hyperion] secret = hyperion permit=192.168.2.76/255.255.255.0 deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 read = system,call,log,verbose,command,agent,user write =

Hello Users, Good Morning, I'm doing on Conference Bridge with Asterisk + OpenSER with CBMySql modules. And I'm not Using the Zapptel Cards. 9001 ----------> dial 19001(conference Users)-------openSER ---------> Asterisk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *In Extension.conf * [from-sip] exten =>

> Ok, I've just checked doing the same thing under windows. > > The test(ripdaveno is the name of the Computer I tested on): > > { > ... > hostent* h = gethostbyname("ripdaveno"); > char* str = inet_ntoa(*((in_addr*)h->h_addr_list[0])); > ... > } > > The string in str was "192.168.2.75" which is my Network IP-Adress. With >

Hello Users , I Posted to mailing list, No one is replying My issues, My Issue is No Audio when Openser and Asterik integrated in Same LAN , When UAC are Behind the NAT, With out the Asterisk integration Behind the NAT is working Fine. SIP port and RTP ports are forwarded into router to OpenSER System only. openser.cfg listen=192.168.2.11 alias=sip.hyperion.com # Invite Section if ( method==

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM