similar to: FW: G.726 on Asterisk 1.4.0

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "FW: G.726 on Asterisk 1.4.0"

2005 Jul 09
1
Remote SIP Connection using Asterisk // Cisco7940's
Yes, I can call the phones, they ring, etc, and call call out, just no outbound audio. Is their any difference in the inbound & outbound audio streams in Asterisk that could cause it, e.g., different ports, protocols, connection/discovery methods, etc? Thanks, Ross ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Carlos Alperin"
2006 Dec 06
1
Same issue, different way to ask.
Since nobody answer my previous question (It looks like g.726 is a bad word). I have this scenario: One box with Asterisk 1.4.0 beta 2 IAX to anothers Asterisk working properly. As an ATA I have only one Grandstream HT496. Two lines on the ATA 727 & 726. >From outside I can call any of those two extensions if: I defined both as ulaw (G.711) One as ulaw and the other as G.729
2005 Feb 09
0
A newbie question
This issue may sounds trivial I need to build a Router for send Internet + VoIP traffic. The computers are in a different network that the Phone Gateway. The Computers are going to be send to a 3 Mbps connection using OSPF, in the meantime the phones are going to be send to a T1 using OSPF too. The routing software is going to be Zebra. I need to switch the outgoing in case that the T1 or
2006 Dec 05
0
G.726 on Asterisk 1.4.0
I'm trying to make a new box with Asterisk 1.4.0, work with one ATA GrandStream 496 and G.726. However I modified the rtp.c as suggested for the Sipura's ATA with USE_DEPRECATED_G726=1 is not working. Someone knows about this? Thanks, Carlos Alperin
2010 Aug 02
6
Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)
Hello list, Grandstream GXP2010 phone calling to Snom 320, Asterisk in the middle. Grandstream allows for 8 different codec specifications. I have defined them as 4 x G726 & 4 x alaw. Snom allow for 7 different codec specifications. I have defined them as 3 x G726 & 4 x G729. The SIP peers are both defined as : disallow=all allow=g726 allow=alaw allow=g729 allow=gsm This is the
2007 Feb 20
6
FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel versions. I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy. I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but
2004 Jul 09
1
RE: ATA 186, firmware SIP 3.1 and codec g.726 + now SIPURA SPA-2000
To me it's a error if I can't complete calls using the ATA configured to use the g726 codec. I just tried it usign a sipura SPA-2000 (preferred codec: G726-32) and I received NOTICES and WARNINGS, but I can't complete a call. On a zap channel: -- Executing Dial("SIP/2007-e4d8", "Zap/1/2217008") in new stack -- Called 1/2217008 -- Zap/1-1 answered
2006 Dec 20
2
Asterisk Now
I finished to try to install Asterisk Now 1.4.0 on an AMD 3800 dual processor machine. The install lookups on the search for the Sata drive, since however it loads the sata_sil driver it doesn't work. Did someone knows what version of Linux is using on Asterisk Now? Thanks, Carlos Alperin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2009 May 22
1
Can't get G.726 to work.
Hi, I have both codec_g726.so and format_g726.so loaded: root at test:~# asterisk -r -x "module show" | grep 726 codec_g726.so ITU G.726-32kbps G726 Transcoder 0 format_g726.so Raw G.726 (16/24/32/40kbps) data 0 But when I try to dial into Asterisk with Twinkle softphone using G.726 codec: INVITE ..... [SIP headers omitted] v=0
2005 Jul 02
1
Sipura SPA2000 behind NAT
Hi, I've one Sipura SPA2000 at home behind a linuxbox with two network adapters (eth0 for WAN and eth1 for LAN) doing NAT/DHCP: ___________ HOME _______________ ____OFFICE ____ SPA2000 <---> Linux Box <--> Asterisk Box 192.168.0.253 192.168.0.1 eth1 200.93.xxx.a 200.93.xxx.b eth0 My problem is when I try to call to any trunk or extention
2009 Mar 18
1
Asterisk and G.726 Codec
Dear all, I am doing an interop testing with asterisk-1.6.0.5 now, and I have a question about the G.726 codec on asterisk. While my IAD supportes G.726-16,24,32 and 40 codecs, when doing a testing about G.726-40, I found that asterisk removed the G.72-40 sdp attrib when transmitting the INVITE with SDP. I modified sip.conf in order to solve the problem, G.726-32 is ok when allow=g726, but
2004 Jul 09
3
ATA 186, firmware SIP 3.1 and codec g.726
I have a ATA 186 with SIP firmware 3.1 when I changed the configurations to use the g.726 codec I received many erros and the calls doesn't work. I changed the fields: - LBRCodec: 6 <- the code for g.726 - TXCodec: 6 - RxCodec: 6 The errors: Jul 9 13:15:37 NOTICE[1192491824]: rtp.c:500 ast_rtp_read: Unable to calculate samples for format G726 Jul 9 13:15:37 NOTICE[1192491824]:
2004 Mar 30
1
G726 not working ?
Hi, I am running FC1 with latest patches of 3/30/04, and I have the latest CVS as of this morning 3/30/04 of asterisk, zap and libpri. The SIP device I am using is a Sipura SPA-2000 with G726-32 "Forced". When I 'make clean" and recompiled zaptel, libpri, asterisk and start asterisk I can see: [format_g726.so] [format_g726.so] => (Raw G.726 (16/24/32/40kbps) data) ==
2006 Jun 22
7
SE Michigan asterisk users group
I am thinking of getting an asterisk user group together for either SE Michigan or just Metro-Detroit. How much interest in asterisk in Michigan is there on this list? I am already on the board of glimasoutheast, with is a group for technology professionals. (very broad range) It is a spin-off from Automation Alley, which is SE Michigan's version of Silicone Valley. -- Steven
2005 Mar 20
1
I cannot use G711 (ulaw|alaw)
Dear all, I'm trying to use ulaw and alaw with Diax and Asterisk but I'm not able to, I got the following error message: Mar 20 11:47:59 NOTICE[7099]: chan_iax2.c:6350 socket_read: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.0.55, requested/capability 0x8/0xc incompatible with our capability 0xfe02. I do not understand why because my Asterisk box load these codecs properly! Does somebody
2005 Oct 07
3
RE: faxing to/from asterisk - new scripts
Roman: I created two bash scripts called Mail2Fax and Fax2Mail for use with the asterisk sever. They leverage the app_txfax and app_rxfax scripts, along with ast_fax. They make using these apps a lot easier, including being able to mail to fax@domain.ca for outgoing faxes and then extracting phone numbers from the subject line! (Makes it easy to use with Sendmail without complex rules /
2010 Nov 03
1
inbound call issue...
Can anyone tell me why my inbound calls keep getting rejected with 401? Here's the debug information: <--- SIP read from UDP:147.135.32.221:5060 ---> INVITE sip:6087294351 at 216.26.109.22:5060 SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 31007e-31 at 147.135.32.221 CSeq: 1 INVITE From: "Wi M"<sip:4144038968 at 147.135.32.221;user=phone>;tag=9bbc To: "Gregory Malsack"<sip:s at
2010 Jul 05
1
Problems with ulaw/g729 translation
Dear Folks, I'm running Asterisk 1.4.31 server, on an Ubuntu 9.10 system. My scenario is simple: connection to the PSTN directly via SIP, using g729 codec, and connection to the softphones (X-lite 3.0 build 56125) trought local network, using ulaw codec. Sometimes, I got messages like: [Jul 1 15:26:16] WARNING[26483]: chan_sip.c:5514 process_sdp: Unsupported SDP media type in offer: image
2005 Jul 06
4
problem with iax2 and 2 peers behind nat
Hi all, i have a problem with 2 peers conecting to an asterisk machine, both are conected behind nat without any port mapping in the router, and the * is conected behind other nat with the port 4569 mapped to it address, the problem is: when a peer register to the asterisk the other cant register and viceversa, only gets registration the first one, im using firefly and a hardphone from wuchuan,
2020 Jun 17
0
Codec question
Ok - updating the firmware on teh device - factory reset, re-config. Capabilities: us - (g726|slin16|ulaw|alaw|gsm), peer - audio=(ulaw|alaw|g726|slin16)/video=(nothing)/text=(nothing), combined - (g726|slin16|ulaw|alaw) Looking much better. Jerry On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:01 PM Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote: > I thought - what about the software - maybe it needs updated.