similar to: zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 Getting it to compile on Fedora Core 6 _64bit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 Getting it to compile on Fedora Core 6 _64bit"

2006 Nov 30
6
zaptel compilation problems with linux 2.6.19
Hello! I have problems compiling zaptel (tried 1.2.11, 1.2.10 and 1.4.0-beta2 -- all give the same error) with 2.6.19 kernel CC [M] /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.o In file included from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/xpd.h:26, from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.c:28:
2007 Feb 21
3
Zaptel 1.4.0
I go to my Zaptel 1.4.0 folder and run ./configure; make linux26; make install and I don't see any errors. This is out of my modprobe.conf: install tor2 /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install tor2 && /sbin/ztcfg install torisa /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install torisa && /sbin/ztcfg install wcusb /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install wcusb && /sbin/ztcfg install wcfxo
2004 Nov 23
1
Error on install under Fedora Core 3
Although I had no problems getting Asterisk up and running under RedHat 9 I'm running into problems under FC 3. When running make linux26 I get: make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel modules make[1]: Entering directory `/lib/modules/2.6.9-1.678_FC3/build' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel/pciradio.o /usr/src/zaptel/pciradio.c:196:19: radfw.h: No such file or directory
2006 Dec 26
3
I cant install zaptel drivers in suse 10.1
Hi, All How do I install Zaptel drivers on a system running Suse? Make results: grep: /lib/modules/2.6.16.13-4-smp/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No existe el fichero o el directorio make[1]: Entering directory /usr/src/asterisk/zaptel/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 make -C /lib/modules/2.6.16.13-4-smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/asterisk/zaptel/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 modules make[2]: Entering directory
2007 Feb 19
1
Problems with CentOS ztdummy kernel 2.6
Hi List, I am having some trouble with installing the latest version of ztdummy on a CentOS Kernel 2.6 system. I have installed a few Asterisk systems on Slackware Kernel 2.4.x without any issues, unfortunately there is no choice about this distro, or kernel as it has been preinstalled by someone else. And so I am in the dark with an unfamiliar distro and kernel. I am fairly sure the
2006 Nov 15
0
Zaptel 1.4.0-beta2 compile error
I'm getting the following error trying to compile zaptel 1.4.0-beta2 on my RH9 (2.4.20-8smp) system. Can anyone shed some light on this? zttranscode.c: In function `zt_tc_mmap': zttranscode.c:387: warning: passing arg 1 of `remap_page_range_Rsmp_d8cd9cb2' makes pointer from integer without a cast zttranscode.c:387: incompatible type for argument 4 of
2006 Nov 08
1
Still problems with Asterisk on latest Debian
Hi all, I have now reinstalled my whole system because I had to change a few things wiht my drives. Here is what happens. I have done apt-get build-dep asterisk apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686 which works just fine now. Downloaded the latest files from digiums ftp. First I unpacked zaptel. I am doing everything as root. Then I just type make. Here is what happens: checking for gcc...
2010 Jan 31
1
v2.0.beta2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta2.tar.gz.sig I tried to keep the configuration and APIs compatible with v2.0.beta1, but unfortunately there were a few things that really had to be changed: 1. passdbs and userdbs have now a separate "driver" setting inside them. So for example if you had: userdb passwd {
2010 Jan 31
1
v2.0.beta2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta2.tar.gz.sig I tried to keep the configuration and APIs compatible with v2.0.beta1, but unfortunately there were a few things that really had to be changed: 1. passdbs and userdbs have now a separate "driver" setting inside them. So for example if you had: userdb passwd {
2018 May 19
2
Icecast 2.5 beta2 release
We are pleased to announce Icecast 2.5 beta2 (2.4.99.2). This is a beta release and not recommended for production use. ## Downloads -   Source:     http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/icecast/icecast-2.5-beta2.tar.gz -   SHA256sum:     a83baf4ae3ee5c2822bcb4286b7438b01317ccb8387371922e9cd32fe1c453e8 -   Packages:     https://build.opensuse.org/repositories/multimedia:xiph:beta ## New features
2018 May 19
2
Icecast 2.5 beta2 release
We are pleased to announce Icecast 2.5 beta2 (2.4.99.2). This is a beta release and not recommended for production use. ## Downloads -   Source:     http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/icecast/icecast-2.5-beta2.tar.gz -   SHA256sum:     a83baf4ae3ee5c2822bcb4286b7438b01317ccb8387371922e9cd32fe1c453e8 -   Packages:     https://build.opensuse.org/repositories/multimedia:xiph:beta ## New features
2007 Sep 30
1
Released v1.1.beta2
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta2.tar.gz.sig Several bug/crashfixes. deliver now supports -a parameter (see http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA) which allows Sieve plugin v1.1.2 to use envelope :detail "to" checks. I also did one more API change for mailbox_transaction_commit*(). There's probably something
2006 Jan 22
4
1.0.beta2 released
I had originally thought that I'd do a complete audit of the Dovecot's sources this weekend, but looks like I didn't. Hopefully I've been writing good enough code that the "1000 EUR for security hole" offer lasts for a long time. :) This release should fix the SSL parameter regeneration problem. There were two changes that were needed to fix it, but I had forgotten the
2005 Sep 23
1
ztdummy compile again
Hi, I'm still strugling with getting an easy to use conference system implemented. I did have app_conference running, but today I upgraded asterisk to 1.0.9 and it stopped working. I've tried following the instructions for compiling app_conference on 1.0.7 but it didn't work. So I went back to ztdummy (I've not had any luck getting this to compile on FC2). Anyhoo, I've
2013 Mar 30
2
Icecast 2.4 beta2 release
This is to announce the release of Icecast 2.4 beta2 (aka 2.3.99.2). We've landed some important features and we're looking forward to testing and feedback. As this is a beta release please discuss it on the icecast-dev mailing list. (Please do NOT cross-post to both lists, do not reply to the icecast mailing list). New features - Now compiles for win32 using mingw Added
2013 Mar 30
2
Icecast 2.4 beta2 release
This is to announce the release of Icecast 2.4 beta2 (aka 2.3.99.2). We've landed some important features and we're looking forward to testing and feedback. As this is a beta release please discuss it on the icecast-dev mailing list. (Please do NOT cross-post to both lists, do not reply to the icecast mailing list). New features - Now compiles for win32 using mingw Added
2007 Aug 01
7
Problems building zaptel 1.4.4
Hi, I'm having trouble compiling zaptel 1.4.4 on SUSE 10.1. I'm really only interested in getting ztdummy to work because this is a dev machine with no zaptel h/w. SUSE 10.1 is a 2.6 kernel: asterisk-dev:/home/hugh # uname -r 2.6.16.13-4-default It seems that my problem is related to autoconf.h - I cannot find that file: asterisk-dev:/home/hugh # find / -name 'autoconf.h'
2006 Oct 28
1
Compiling Zaptel 1.2.10 on Ubuntu 6.10
Here's a weird problem that I'm not quite sure how to resolve. Zaptel 1.2.10 compiles just fine with "make", but when "make install" is run, this happens: [ `id -u` = 0 ] && /sbin/depmod -a 2.6.17-10-generic || : [ -f /etc/zaptel.conf ] || install -D -m 644 zaptel.conf.sample /etc/zaptel.conf build_tools/genmodconf linux26 "" "tor2 torisa wcusb
2006 Oct 11
1
1.4 beta2 on intel mac
Has anyone built and run asterisk 1.4 beta2 on an intel mac? Did it work? I've got it building ok (once I installed Xcode, wget and bison) However Asterisk hangs on startup (halfway through loading the modules). I have not (yet) had time to debug it, but I wondered if anyone else had done this before me ? Tim Panton www.mexuar.com
2000 Nov 29
2
comparison of beta2 and beta3 encoder quality
Hi, I encoded some songs into 350 kbit/s with beta2 and beta3 too, and I don't know why, but it seems the b2 sounds better (makes a better quality ogg file)... The b2 contains more the b3 contains less high sounds. And with the b3, the size of file is smaller with 4-5%... Do you know this problem, or do you think so, that the sound quality is good (or better in the b3) ?? Please be carefull