similar to: 2nd attempt - Return code - How to?

This code executes just fine, and leaves the SIP peer's mailbox setting from sip.conf in variable target. exten => 1,1,Set(target=${CHANNEL:4}-) exten => 1,n,Set(target=${SIPPEER(${CUT(target,,1)}:mailbox}) exten => 1,n,VoiceMailMain(${target}) However, every time it runs I get an error in the CLI as follows WARNING[5629]: pbx.c:1366 ast_func_read: Can't

Hi, I'm starting testing 1.6.2 beta. CentOs 5.2 I found my first crash, first I have [Mar 20 20:30:41] WARNING[11201]: res_config_mysql.c:611 update_mysql: Attempted to update column 'useragent' in table 'sip', but column does not exist! [Mar 20 20:30:41] ERROR[11201]: res_config_mysql.c:581 update_mysql: MySQL RealTime: Updating on column 'lastms', but

Hello, I'm trying to use SIP_HEADER function on my dialplan but I receive this message (on the console): pbx.c:3367 ast_func_read: Function SIP_Header not registered Why? Thank's - Bakko

I've done a decent size update of the OpenSSH portable from the upstream tree. There is an AES upgrade that needs to take place, but I need people to test and tell me what endedness changes need to be applied (if any). Attached is the patch. It is geared towards the latter snapshots..Unsure how it will patch (if at all) against 2.9pX series. Thanks. - Ben "This is dark day in

Hello, In Asterisk 1.4 beta 3, the UPGRADE.txt file says: Variables: * The builtin variables ${CALLERID}, ${CALLERIDNAME}, ${CALLERIDNUM}, ${CALLERANI}, ${DNID}, ${RDNIS}, ${DATETIME}, ${TIMESTAMP}, ${ACCOUNTCODE}, and ${LANGUAGE} have all been deprecated in favor of their related dialplan functions. You are encouraged to move towards the associated dialplan function, as these

Hi: How can I extract the dimension-names of a pre-defined element in a multidimensional array in R ? A toy example is provided below: I have a 4-dimensional array with each dimension having certain length. In the below example, "mydatastructure" explains the structure of my data. mydatastructure = array(0, dim=c(length(b),length(z),length(x),length(d)), dimnames=list(b,z,x,d)) where,

Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the kernel to be PIE compatible. Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> --- arch/x86/crypto/aes-x86_64-asm_64.S | 45 ++++++++----- arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S

I have coded a time series from simulated data: simtimeseries <- arima.sim(n=1024,list(order=c(4,0,0),ar=c(2.7607, -3.8106, 2.6535, -0.9258),sd=sqrt(1))) #show roots are outside unit circle plot.ts(simtimeseries, xlab="", ylab="", main="Time Series of Simulated Data") # Yule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- q1 <-

The recent discussion of nsw led me to go back and review the current definition of nsw in greater depth, and it turns out that even with all the theoretical effort, it's still logically inconsistent. First, a warning: The scenario below is artificial. This is just a demonstration. Also, ignore the fact that instcombine would zap everything. Depending on that would be an implicit pass

Hello, In R I am trying to use Kalman filtering to find a solution for an hydrological problem. With Kalman Filtering I want to estimate the discharge comming from three storage bassins. I have programmed a function in R which can run KalmanSmooth. When I'm asking for the function and putting in values, R detects the following error: "Error in as.vector(data) : Argument "S1" is

Dear all R users, I want to realize 800 000 ANOVAS and to store Sum of Squares of the effects. Here is an extract of my table data Product attribute subject rep t1 t2 t3 … t101 P1 A1 S1 R1 1 0 0 … 1 I want to realize 1 ANOVA per timepoint and per attribute, there are 101 timepoints and 8 attributes so I want to realize 808 ANOVAS. This will be an ANOVA with two factors : Here is one example:

Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> writes: > Next, we perform a promotion transformation, converting the add nsw > from i32 to i64: > > %s0 = sext i32 %a to i64 > %s1 = sext i32 %b to i64 > %t0 = add nsw i64 %s0, %s1 > %t2 = ashr i64 %t0, 31 > %t3 = add i64 %t2, 1 > %t5 = icmp ult %t3, 2 > %t6 = udiv i1 1, %t5 > br i1 %overflow_check, label

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >>>> On

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Santosh Nagarakatte >> <santosh.nagarakatte at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been trying to understand the use of undef in

Hi all, I'm trying to test a repeated measures model with random effects using the nlme library. Suppose I have two within subjects factors A, B both with two levels. Using aov I can do: aov.1 <- aov(y ~ A*B + Error(S/(A+B)) following Pinheiro and Bates I can acheive the analagous mixed-effects model with: lme.1 <- lme(y~A*B, random=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~1),pdIdent(~A-1),

Greetings all- I have some dialplan code on an Asterisk 1.2.x box that basically dials a call, then after call completion, runs a command via System(). However, I'm finding that roughly 5% of the time, the System() command never executes and seems to be on specific destinations. Simplified/paraphrased example: exten => 1,1,Set(VARIABLE=SOMEVALUE) exten =>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >>>> On

Beginner: How can a script be called after a calling user hangup? What's wrong with this: [incoming] exten => s,1,Playback,welcome exten => s,2,Record,msgfile:gsm exten => h,1,Goto(callscript,1,1) [callscript] exten => 1,1,Wait,5 exten => 1,2,System("SomeScript") Thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: