similar to: SOLVED: Digium TE405 card and Matra PBX

Hello asterisk-users, I have problem with E1 line between Asterisk computer and our PBX Matra: asta*CLI> pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 16 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: EuroISDN Type: CPE Window Length: 0/7 Sentrej: 0 SolicitFbit: 0 Retrans: 0 Busy: 0 Overlap Dial: 0 T200 Timer: 1000 T203 Timer: 10000 T305 Timer: 30000 T308 Timer: 4000 T313 Timer: 4000 N200 Counter: 3 My

Hello all, please, can anyone advertise me some channel banks, which can operate with E1 (30 FXS)? Rack-mountable option is welcome. I've tried to google, but I've not found nothing appropriate. More than one E1 link is welcome too. Everyone channel banks, which I've found, was between T1 and FXS(O), but I have Digium E1 card and I want use for one line 30 channels and not only 24.

Hi iam installing zaptel 1.2.10 on my FC5 when i make iam getting following error any one suggest me whats wrong, i have installed source also in the same server. grep: /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory ZAPTELVERSION="1.2.10" build_tools/make_version_h > version.h.tmp if cmp -s version.h.tmp version.h ; then echo; else \

Hi, Is it possible to use 4 TE405 boards in one server ? It mean, to have 16 E1s on just one server. Can somebody tell me how many boards is it possible to have on one server ? Thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060605/29e9d42d/attachment.htm

I have a TE405/TE410P card that was working on 1.0.X I upgraded the OS to Centos 4.5, Updated asterisk to 1.4 and zaptel to 1.4.5 and libpri. I copied all the zaptel and zapata and extensions.conf files from 1.0 I did update extensions.conf from 1.0 to 1.4 commands. I cannot get the card to work in 1.4.10. AHHH! I see with zttool that the T1 is in Green, I see calls coming in as the bits go

Hi, I have to link an Asterisk Box with a PBX Matra 6501. System look like this : E1------Te110P Asterisk Te110P-----E1----Matra 6501-----Phones | | Ip Phones Incoming call from E1 will enter on asterisk, if incoming number is _800n then go to IP phones. In this case no problem. But if it's an another call i want to return call to my

NOT WANTED On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1508 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) How do I use multiple NT password servers > by jurgessj@b1b.ok.boeing.com (John E. Jurgess ) > 2) Re: How do I use multiple NT password servers > by Luke

I have got the change to set op an Asterisk PBX for one department in a large organisation. This means that in instead of connecting the Asterisk direct to the PSTN thought E1 interface (ISDN) I have to connect thought the big PBX central (IS3000).(http://pbcextra.net/commonnet/marcom/pdf/001_06221.pdf) Is there any body who has experience with this? The right size of connection between the

Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs. A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows: 1 - 4 2 - 5 3 - NU 4 - 1 5 - 2 6 - NU 7 - NU 8 - NU NU = Not Used I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you should be fine. As far as the shielding

Hi list, we want to connect asterisk to an traditionnal PBX (EADS 6550/Matra). People from telco told that they can't connect two PBX's using E1/T1 or only with QSig signaling. I wanted to use EuroISDN. In this case, it was me told that VN6-VN7 would be used. The PBX has a spare ADQ card installed on which we would connect. Has someone a such working setup? Is it working well? More

I for one think it is a great idea to buy a book with hard earned money and wait a few days to a week just to get an answer to a question that is freely available on the internet immediately. Hard pressed to think of anything in the "book" that is not on with wiki with more up to date and useful information. -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Lopez

very modular 2.4.17; 2xPIII-800; no HIGHMEM; gcc-2.96-98; all ext3; modules loaded include autofs4, nfs, nfsd, eepro100, acenic, ipchains, unix, gdth. This happened during the dump (incrcp.pl is a custom backup script also happening at the time). Does ext3-0.9.17 fix this? kernel BUG at transaction.c:609! invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 1 EIP:

Greetings, I have 3 SLES 10 SP3 servers running Xen (3.2.3). The motherboard is a Tyan S3992 h2000M and I have dual quad-core AMD Opterons wit 8GiB RAM. The board''s BIOS is up to date. When I boot the Xen kernel, memory performance seems very slow: $ time memhog 100m mbind: Function not implemented get_mempolicy: Function not implemented .......... real 0m1.117s user 0m0.148s sys

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386 Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: important When I try to start a domU with more than 6 vdb it crash. The first time the vm does not launch and aparently wait for the loop device creation (some scripts/block add, udev --daemon and sleep 1 process running). And nothing happen until I Ctrl+C the xm create. My loop module is loaded with 64 loops. After this first

Hi Srs. we have to integrate a Nortel MATRA M6501-L with Asterisk with a TE410P. All call from outside get into asterisk and asterisk send to Nortel in a correct way. My problem is when a call is made from Nortel to Asterisk. If we digit a national Number in Spain([98]ZXXXXXXX or 6XXXXXXXX) all work find. But if we digit an international number call doesn't progress. I Have seen in

I just upgraded my Windows SSH client from the 2.1.x version (whatever it was) to 2.2.0 and am now experiencing difficulties connecting to my OpenSSH-2.1.1p1 Linux servers. I'm not as up-to-speed as I should be on the inner workings of the handshakes that go on, but from the debug logs and from trying different connection methods, it seems to be isolated to using publickeys. This

Kip, Does the problem with Xen 3.1 in HVM/Intel manifest as those BTX halted errors (e.g. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-10/msg00014.html) ? If so, do you happen to know whether this problem has been solved in Xen 3.2 or 3.2.1? This message of yours was written this March, so I'm assuming that 3.2.1 will contain this fix? Can anybody confirm this? I'm having

The Wine development release 1.3.23 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Support for stubless COM proxies on x86-64. - Builtin dxdiag now outputs real information. - Monochrome bitmap format in the DIB engine. - Beginnings of a true shell Explorer builtin. - A number of new D3DX9 functions. - More support for Indic text shaping. - Various bug

Just thought I'd pass along that I have successfully installed FreeBSD 7.0 into a Xen 3.1 HVM. ?This one went as smooth as I expected, considering my experience with 6.3. ?Haven't done any benchmarking or stress testing or port installs or anything. ?But so far it's working nicely. Here's all the info. ?If you'd like to see anything else, let me know. Host hardware: ?

The Wine development release 1.3.22 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Support for Indic text shaping. - Generation of stubless code in the IDL compiler. - Support for X files in D3DX. - 4- and 24-bit bitmap formats in the DIB engine. - Listview performance improvements. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following