similar to: Multi-site Redundancy. Possible?

I am testing samba 3.0's net rpc vampire tool and am getting strange results... after I import the account info, the samba usernames seem to be mapping to hardcoded unix uid #'s instead of account names. For example: # pdbedit -u jah000 idmap uid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs idmap gid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs

I don't want to start the "How many calls can Asterisk handle?" discussion or "How many angels can stand on the point of a pin?" discussion either. But can anyone contribute some practical knowledge of systems that take in channel bank T1s or DS3s from "far away", and process the calls? I am looking for real world, been there, done that, or "check the

Hi ! I am running rsync between two server machines where files are being created and removed from both machines simultaneously and I am facing the following problem : When a new file is created on machine 1 it is transferred to machine 2 without any problem, the same happens if a file is deleted from machine 1. But if a new file is created on machine 2, it is deleted from that machine before

David, I guess I'm a little confused here. Are you asking me to provide a "pencil copy" of an LOA for your review? I don't understand why you need an LOA from us. We need an LOA from you to order circuits that will be billed to us that will be attached to your CFA. It was also my understanding that you had an LOA ready to be given to us, which had already been reviewed by

On 2/12/2011 6:58 PM, nullnull wrote: > I'm a Windows user, and wish to run LLVM-Clang on Windows. > In Visual Studio 2010, buidling was fairly straightforward via the > solution file from CMake. However, there is no good document (thought > I searched for an hour) how to compile LLVM with MinGW on Windows. > I generated MinGW Makefile and build directories from CMake. Ok.

I'm looking to build a robust inbound DID access layer for an application I am working on. This might start off simply as 8 DID T1/ISDN lines and eventually grow to a few dozen T1 lines worth of access or higher. (In a prior life, I had 14 DS3s of inbound toll free terminating on Dialogic card based IVR platforms ... then one day the Asterisk/VoIP bug bit me but that's another story) So

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box with 5 N/W cards of which one is 10/100/1000T and the others are 10/100T. I connected all the cards and turned on the machine. I wanted to force eth0 to be the 1000T cards but the cards get allotted eth0 to eth4 randomly. Is there some way wherein I can force my 1000T card to be eth0. Also I want to turn off auto negotation & flow control on the 1000T

I'm a Windows user, and wish to run LLVM-Clang on Windows. In Visual Studio 2010, buidling was fairly straightforward via the solution file from CMake. However, there is no good document (thought I searched for an hour) how to compile LLVM with MinGW on Windows. I generated MinGW Makefile and build directories from CMake. I installed entire MinGW+MSys packages. I tried to run "make -f

I'm trying to set up an Asterisk system for a small office, and one thing I haven't figured out yet is how to best provide reliability. One way to go seems to be a T1 for all my incoming phone lines. What if that T1 goes down? Can I use mutiple POTS lines in conjuction with a T1, all connecting to my Asterisk server? What if my Asterisk server fails? Should I use two Asterisk servers,

Hi Timo, Are there any plans to support the SIZE option in the lmtp server? Paul

I have a customer installation with an Adtran DS3 mux. The DS1's go into my Asterisk servers that run IVR/Call recorders. The DS3 provider is Qwest, and they tell me that they routinely drop the DS3 service to redundant back-up's and that this is a common practice that happens thousands of times to DS3 lines daily across the US without any service interruptions. They say that the

Dear Asterisk Gurus: Our county is finally ready to begin implementing IP telephony. We intend to use a Cisco router as our PSTN gateway and Asterisk as our soft switch. The plan is to use SIP between the Cisco router and Asterisk. We will have a single PRI T1 connected to the Cisco router for PSTN access. My question is this: Are Cisco routers able to pass caller ID information (from PRI

> 3. I'm interested in the methodology for creating a fixed point > implementation and guaging how "good" it is relative to the floating > point golden standard My methodology at this stage is to get it working on the floating point DSP first and to gain recent experience in both Speex and the TI DSP range while I do so. Then I'll enter into serious discussions about

Hi guys, I''m new to Xen - in fact I haven''t installed it yet - wanted to find out a bit more before I test the waters. Here''s what I want to do: 1. I''m getting a new Intel Core duo laptop within a couple of days. I believe the core duo chips have Vanderpool technology so it shouldn''t be a problem getting Xen to run windows unmodified - is this

So far in January, we've had 726 messages on -users. December 2003: 2.978 messages November 2003: 3.410 messages October 2003: 3.177 messages December 2002: 741 messages December 2001: 67 messages ...the project is growing. /Olle

Hello all, We are looking for some hardware requirements/recommendations to be able to handle a full DS3's worth of TDM -> VoIP traffic. The DS3 would bring 24 calls per T1 x 28 T1s = 672 simultaneous calls. We would then need to convert those calls into G729 SIP VoIP calls to send to our asterisk box over ethernet. Since everything is going in/out of asterisk is 729, and no features

i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my needs. i would appreciate any corrections of what i think i have understood but probably have not. iax uses udp and traverses nats. neither of these seems useful to me. i loathe nats, and udp is not well-behaved in the sense of congestion avoidance. trunking will save some bytes in flight iff one has four or more streams moving between two

Hi Running dovecot 2.1.7 (from debian repo). We have some old compressed maildir messages with the wrong S= size in the filename (our fault). If I delete index files, log in to the mailbox and try to FETCH the bad message, dovecot complains about the incorrect message size, attempts to fix the filename and disconnects the client. However, it changes the filesize to the size of the message on

Hi, Inspired by a recent rant about one particular provider, I am getting very curious about something I've never mastered. I'd like someone to explain this here or at least post a link or two that can educate me and probably countless others who have no knowledge in this area. I'm sure there are several of you reading this that know all about the subject. What are the various

Any know what Digium hasn't released the DS3 card? It was supposed to be out a while ago. -Matt